The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) use public reporting and payment penalties as incentives for hospitals to reduce readmission rates. In contrast to the current condition-specific readmission measures, CMS recently developed an all-condition, 30-day all-cause hospital-wide readmission measure (HWR) to provide a more comprehensive view of hospital performance.
We examined whether assessment of hospital performance and payment penalties depends on the readmission measure used.
We used inpatient data to examine readmissions for patients discharged from VA acute-care hospitals from Fiscal Years 2007–2010. We calculated risk-standardized 30-day readmission rates for 3 condition-specific measures (heart failure, acute myocardial infarction, and pneumonia) and the HWR measure, and examined agreement between the HWR measure and each of the condition-specific measures on hospital performance. We also assessed the effect of using different readmission measures on hospitals’ payment penalties.
We found poor agreement between the condition-specific measures and the HWR measure on those hospitals identified as low or high performers (eg, among those hospitals classified as poor performers by the heart failure readmission measure, only 28.6% were similarly classified by the HWR measure). We also found differences in whether a hospital would experience payment penalties. The HWR measure penalized only 60% of those hospitals that would have received penalties based on at least 1 of the condition-specific measures.
The condition-specific measures and the HWR measure provide a different picture of hospital performance. Future research is needed to determine which measure aligns best with CMS’s overall goals to reduce hospital readmissions and improve quality.
Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.
*Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research (CHOIR), VA Boston Healthcare System
†Department of Surgery, Boston University School of Medicine
‡Boston University Questrom School of Business, Operations and Technology Management Department
§VA Boston Healthcare System
∥Department of Health Law, Policy and Management, Boston University School of Public Health
¶Department of General Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA
Supplemental Digital Content is available for this article. Direct URL citations appear in the printed text and are provided in the HTML and PDF versions of this article on the journal's Website, www.lww-medicalcare.com.
Parts of this study were presented at the annual meeting of the International Forum on Quality and Safety in Healthcare, London, England, April 22, 2015.
Supported by the VA Health Services Research and Development Service (HSR&D), Grant # IIR-09-369, Amy Rosen, Principal Investigator.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Reprints: Amy K. Rosen, PhD, Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, 150 S. Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA 02130. E-mail: email@example.com.