Skip Navigation LinksHome > April 2013 - Volume 51 - Issue > Methodology Issues in Implementation Science
Medical Care:
doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31827feeca
Original Articles

Methodology Issues in Implementation Science

Newhouse, Robin PhD, RN, NEA-BC, FAAN*; Bobay, Kathleen PhD, RN, NEA-BC; Dykes, Patricia C. DNSc, RN, FAAN, FACMI; Stevens, Kathleen R. EdD, RN, ANEF, FAAN§; Titler, Marita PhD, RN, FAAN

Collapse Box


Background: Putting evidence into practice at the point of care delivery requires an understanding of implementation strategies that work, in what context and how.

Objective: To identify methodological issues in implementation science using 4 studies as cases and make recommendations for further methods development.

Research Design: Four cases are presented and methodological issues identified. For each issue raised, evidence on the state of the science is described.

Results: Issues in implementation science identified include diverse conceptual frameworks, potential weaknesses in pragmatic study designs, and the paucity of standard concepts and measurement.

Conclusions: Recommendations to advance methods in implementation include developing a core set of implementation concepts and metrics, generating standards for implementation methods including pragmatic trials, mixed methods designs, complex interventions and measurement, and endorsing reporting standards for implementation studies.

© 2013 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.


Article Tools


Article Level Metrics

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.