Home Current Issue Previous Issues Published Ahead-of-Print Collections Blog For Authors Journal Info
Skip Navigation LinksHome > June 2012 - Volume 50 - Issue 6 > A Hybrid Center for Medicaid and Medicare Service Mortality...
Medical Care:
doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318245a5f2
Brief Report

A Hybrid Center for Medicaid and Medicare Service Mortality Model in 3 Diagnoses

Render, Marta L. MD*,†; Almenoff, Peter L. MD*,‡; Christianson, Annette MS*; Sales, Anne E. PhD*,§,∥; Czarnecki, Tammy RN, MS; Deddens, Jim A. PhD#; Freyberg, Ron W. MS*; Eyman, Julie MS*; Hofer, Timothy P. MD, MSc§,**

Supplemental Author Material
Collapse Box

Abstract

Introduction: Reliance on administrative data sources and a cohort with restricted age range (Medicare 65 y and above) may limit conclusions drawn from public reporting of 30-day mortality rates in 3 diagnoses [acute myocardial infarction (AMI), congestive heart failure (CHF), pneumonia (PNA)] from Center for Medicaid and Medicare Services.

Methods: We categorized patients with diagnostic codes for AMI, CHF, and PNA admitted to 138 Veterans Administration hospitals (2006–2009) into 2 groups (less than 65 y or ALL), then applied 3 different models that predicted 30-day mortality [Center for Medicaid and Medicare Services administrative (ADM), ADM+laboratory data (PLUS), and clinical (CLIN)] to each age/diagnosis group. C statistic (CSTAT) and Hosmer Lemeshow Goodness of Fit measured discrimination and calibration. Pearson correlation coefficient (r) compared relationship between the hospitals’ risk-standardized mortality rates (RSMRs) calculated with different models. Hospitals were rated as significantly different (SD) when confidence intervals (bootstrapping) omitted National RSMR.

Results: The ≥65-year models included 57%–67% of all patients (78%–82% deaths). The PLUS models improved discrimination and calibration across diagnoses and age groups (CSTAT—CHF/65 y and above: 0.67 vs. 0. 773 vs. 0.761; ADM/PLUS/CLIN; Hosmer Lemeshow Goodness of Fit significant 4/6 ADM vs. 2/6 PLUS). Correlation of RSMR was good between ADM and PLUS (r—AMI 0.859; CHF 0.821; PNA 0.750), and 65 years and above and ALL (r>0.90). SD ratings changed in 1%–12% of hospitals (greatest change in PNA).

Conclusions: Performance measurement systems should include laboratory data, which improve model performance. Changes in SD ratings suggest caution in using a single metric to label hospital performance.

© 2012 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.

Login

Article Tools

Share

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.