Skip Navigation LinksHome > June 2012 - Volume 50 - Issue 6 > A Hybrid Center for Medicaid and Medicare Service Mortality...
Medical Care:
doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318245a5f2
Brief Report

A Hybrid Center for Medicaid and Medicare Service Mortality Model in 3 Diagnoses

Render, Marta L. MD*,†; Almenoff, Peter L. MD*,‡; Christianson, Annette MS*; Sales, Anne E. PhD*,§,∥; Czarnecki, Tammy RN, MS; Deddens, Jim A. PhD#; Freyberg, Ron W. MS*; Eyman, Julie MS*; Hofer, Timothy P. MD, MSc§,**

Supplemental Author Material
Collapse Box


Introduction: Reliance on administrative data sources and a cohort with restricted age range (Medicare 65 y and above) may limit conclusions drawn from public reporting of 30-day mortality rates in 3 diagnoses [acute myocardial infarction (AMI), congestive heart failure (CHF), pneumonia (PNA)] from Center for Medicaid and Medicare Services.

Methods: We categorized patients with diagnostic codes for AMI, CHF, and PNA admitted to 138 Veterans Administration hospitals (2006–2009) into 2 groups (less than 65 y or ALL), then applied 3 different models that predicted 30-day mortality [Center for Medicaid and Medicare Services administrative (ADM), ADM+laboratory data (PLUS), and clinical (CLIN)] to each age/diagnosis group. C statistic (CSTAT) and Hosmer Lemeshow Goodness of Fit measured discrimination and calibration. Pearson correlation coefficient (r) compared relationship between the hospitals’ risk-standardized mortality rates (RSMRs) calculated with different models. Hospitals were rated as significantly different (SD) when confidence intervals (bootstrapping) omitted National RSMR.

Results: The ≥65-year models included 57%–67% of all patients (78%–82% deaths). The PLUS models improved discrimination and calibration across diagnoses and age groups (CSTAT—CHF/65 y and above: 0.67 vs. 0. 773 vs. 0.761; ADM/PLUS/CLIN; Hosmer Lemeshow Goodness of Fit significant 4/6 ADM vs. 2/6 PLUS). Correlation of RSMR was good between ADM and PLUS (r—AMI 0.859; CHF 0.821; PNA 0.750), and 65 years and above and ALL (r>0.90). SD ratings changed in 1%–12% of hospitals (greatest change in PNA).

Conclusions: Performance measurement systems should include laboratory data, which improve model performance. Changes in SD ratings suggest caution in using a single metric to label hospital performance.

© 2012 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.


Article Tools


Article Level Metrics

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.