Medical Care

Skip Navigation LinksHome > June 2010 - Volume 48 - Issue 6 > Literacy-Fair Measurement of Health-Related Quality of Life...
Medical Care:
doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181d6f81b
Comparative Effectiveness

Literacy-Fair Measurement of Health-Related Quality of Life Will Facilitate Comparative Effectiveness Research in Spanish-Speaking Cancer Outpatients

Hahn, Elizabeth A. MA*; Du, Hongyan MS†; Garcia, Sofia F. PhD*; Choi, Seung W. PhD*; Lai, Jin-Shei PhD*; Victorson, David PhD*; Cella, David PhD*

Collapse Box


Background: Health-related quality of life (HRQL) assessment is frequently used in comparative effectiveness research, but low-literacy patients are often excluded. Appropriately translated and user-friendly HRQL measures are essential to ensure inclusion of low-literate and non-English-speaking patients in comparative effectiveness research.

Objectives: To compare HRQL responses across literacy levels in Spanish-speaking patients with cancer using a multimedia touch screen program.

Subjects: A total of 414 adult patients with cancer (213 with low literacy and 201 with high literacy).

Research Design: The touch screen system administered 3 questionnaires: The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General, the Short Form-36 Health Survey, and the Standard Gamble Utility Questionnaire. Measurement bias was evaluated using item response theory. Effects of literacy on HRQL were evaluated using regression models.

Results: Patients rated the touch screen easy to use and commented favorably on the multimedia approach. There was statistically significant item response theory measurement bias in 6 of 10 HRQL subscales; however, only 3 showed meaningful bias. Low-literacy patients had significantly lower mean scores on 3 of 4 Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General subscales, before and after adjustment for patient characteristics. Low-literacy patients also had significantly lower mean scores on 5 of 6 Short Form-36 subscales; adjustment for patient characteristics attenuated or eliminated differences. Similar proportions of low- and high-literacy patients valued their current health as equivalent to perfect health.

Conclusions: This study demonstrates the feasibility of this multimedia touch screen program for low-literacy patients. The program will provide opportunities to evaluate the effectiveness of interventions in more diverse patient populations.

© 2010 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.


Article Tools


Article Level Metrics

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.