Skip Navigation LinksHome > June 2010 - Volume 48 - Issue 6 > An Integrated Evidence Rating to Frame Comparative Effective...
Medical Care:
doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181d9913b
Comparative Effectiveness

An Integrated Evidence Rating to Frame Comparative Effectiveness Assessments for Decision Makers

Ollendorf, Daniel A. MPH; Pearson, Steven D. MD, MSc

Collapse Box

Abstract

Background: An important challenge facing the research community is how to make comparative effectiveness reviews “fit for purpose”—how to translate the results into a format that can provide actionable guidance for all stakeholders trying to improve the quality and value of health care.

Methods: To communicate transparently the overall judgments on the findings from a comparative effectiveness review, the Institute for Clinical and Economic Review (ICER) uses an integrated evidence rating that combines separate ratings of comparative clinical effectiveness and comparative value. These integrated ratings look somewhat like bond ratings, and are suited to foster more direct consideration by all decision makers for potential application to patient information, clinical guidelines, and value-based coverage and payment policies.

Results: ICER Integrated Evidence Ratings have supported coverage decision-making processes in a limited number of public and private payers, and demonstration efforts are underway to link reviews to patient information and revised payment policies. Several important challenges to rating have been encountered and addressed. Early feedback has suggested that the rating format helps decision makers understand the key issues underlying judgments about the comparative effectiveness of alternative interventions.

Conclusion: Decision makers need comparative effectiveness reviews to be objective and rigorous; they also need key judgments regarding the evidence to be translated so all stakeholders can understand and consider them fully. A rating format that captures key judgments about comparative clinical effectiveness and comparative value could prove an effective method for helping ensure that comparative effectiveness reviews are understandable and useful to all stakeholders.

© 2010 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.

Login

Article Tools

Share

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.