Medical Care

Home Current Issue Previous Issues Published Ahead-of-Print For Authors Journal Info
Skip Navigation LinksHome > January 2008 - Volume 46 - Issue 1 > Hospital Variation in Use of Secondary Preventive Medicine A...
Medical Care:
January 2008 - Volume 46 - Issue 1 - pp 70-77
doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181484952
Original Article

Hospital Variation in Use of Secondary Preventive Medicine After Discharge for First Acute Myocardial Infarction During 1995-2004

Rasmussen, Søren MSc, PhD; Abildstrom, Steen Z. MD, PhD; Rasmussen, Jeppe N. MD; Gislason, Gunnar H. MD; Schramm, Tina K. MD; Folke, Fredrik MD; Køber, Lars MD, DMSc; Torp-Pedersen, Christian MD, DMSc; Madsen, Mette MSc

Collapse Box

Abstract

Objective: To examine temporal trends in hospital use of secondary preventive medicine after discharge for first acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in Denmark.

Design: Observational study from national administrative databases of 60,339 patients who survived a first AMI at 73 acute-care hospitals during 1995-2004.

Outcome Measures: At least 1 prescription claim for angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, β-blockers, or statins within 90 days of discharge for AMI.

Findings: The odds ratios between hospitals in the highest and lowest deciles, adjusted for age, gender, period, income, comorbidity, concomitant, and prior pharmaceutical therapy, in 1995 were 8.5 [95% confidence interval (CI), 5.5-12.2] for β-blockers, 3.0 (2.3-3.7) for ACE inhibitors, and 6.2 (4.1-8.8) for statins. By 2004, the hospital variation had decreased for β-blockers (3.2; 2.3-4.0) and statins (4.2; 3.0-5.5) but had increased for ACE inhibitors (3.8; 2.7-4.9). All the changes over time were significant (P < 0.001). Geographical characteristics of the hospital explained 32% of the variation in use of β-blockers in 2004 and 27% in 1995, 39% of the variation in use of ACE inhibitors in 2004 and 3% in 1995, and 29% of the variation in use of statins and 19% in 1995.

Conclusions: Hospital use of secondary preventive medicine after discharge for AMI varied substantially. Hospital variation in use of β-blockers and statins decreased with time whereas variation in use of ACE inhibitors increased. This may be attributed to gradually better agreement for the use of β-blockers and statins and lesser agreement for the use of ACE inhibitors.

© 2008 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.

You currently do not have access to this article.

You may need to:

Note: If your society membership provides for full-access to this article, you may need to login on your society’s web site first.

Article Tools

You currently do not have access to this article.

You may need to:

Note: If your society membership provides for full-access to this article, you may need to login on your society’s web site first.

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.