Home Current Issue Previous Issues Published Ahead-of-Print For Authors Journal Info
Skip Navigation LinksHome > March 2008 - Volume 64 - Issue 3 > The Use of a Powered Device for Intraosseous Drug and Fluid...
You could be reading the full-text of this article now...
If you have access to this article through your institution, you can view this article in OvidSP.
Journal of Trauma-Injury Infection & Critical Care:
March 2008 - Volume 64 - Issue 3 - pp 650-655
doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31814db2a6
Original Articles

The Use of a Powered Device for Intraosseous Drug and Fluid Administration in a National EMS: A 4-Year Experience

Schwartz, Dagan MD; Amir, Lisa MD; Dichter, Reuven MA; Figenberg, Zvi MD

Collapse Box

Abstract

Background: Provide evidence of success rate and limitations of the prehospital use of a powered device for intraosseous (IO) bone infusion, the bone injection gun (BIG) for critical patients in whom peripheral intravenous (IV) access cannot be readily obtained.

Methods: This prospective study included all reports regarding the use of BIG in our national EMS during the study period. The BIG is a FDA and Israeli Health ministry approved device for IO cannulation. Starting April 2000, a new version was introduced to all ALS units. Simultaneously, our medical protocols were updated to include its use and mandatory reporting was initiated. Successful insertion was defined as obtaining a good fluid flow through the needle without evidence of extravasation. This article presents an analysis of the data collected during this period.

Results: From May 2000 to June 2004, 189 patient encounters in which the BIG was employed met inclusion criteria and comprised the study group. Successful insertion on first attempt was achieved in 172 patients (91.0%). In two additional patients, a second attempt was successful. Forty-seven of the patients were below the age of 18 years (24.9%). One hundred ten patients (58.2%) were over 60 years of age. One hundred thirty-three were found without a palpable pulse (70.4%), and only 18 were found with a Glasgow coma scale of 9 or above. The cause was traumatic in 34 patients (18.0%).

Conclusion: The BIG provides an effective alternative IV access for critical patients in whom a peripheral IV line cannot be readily obtained in the prehospital setting.

© 2008 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.

Login




Help

Forgot Password?

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.