Journal of Thoracic Oncology

Home Current Issue Previous Issues Published Ahead-of-Print For Authors Journal Info
Skip Navigation LinksHome > July 2009 - Volume 4 - Issue 7 > Outcomes with Esophageal Cancer Radiation Therapy
Journal of Thoracic Oncology:
July 2009 - Volume 4 - Issue 7 - pp 880-888
doi: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e3181a6f204
Original Article

Outcomes with Esophageal Cancer Radiation Therapy

Zhang, Zhen MD, PhD; Chen, Yuan MD; Chen, Yanzhi MD; Jeter, Melenda MD, MPH; Hofstetter, Wayne L. MD; Ajani, Jaffer MD; Swisher, Stephen G. MD; Chang, Joe Y. MD, PhD; Allen, Pamela K. PhD; Cox, James D. MD; Komaki, Ritsuko MD; Liao, Zhongxing X. MD

Collapse Box

Abstract

Purpose: Esophageal cancer is the seventh leading cause of cancer death worldwide and is responsible for 4% of the cancer deaths in the United States annually. Changing epidemiologic patterns and expanded treatment options have brought this often deadly cancer to the forefront.

Methods and Materials: To characterize epidemiological changes, the effect of treatment advances, and patient outcomes over time, we retrospectively reviewed 756 consecutive esophageal cancer cases treated between 1985 to 2003 at The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center in Houston. For purposes of evaluation, cases were divided into four cohorts of approximately 5 years each. Men make up 75% or more of the patients with esophageal cancer, most patients have adenocarcinoma in the gastroesophageal junction, and almost 75% have stage II or III disease.

Results: Three-year overall survival improved from 16.7% (1985-1989) to 35.2% (2000-2003). By multivariate Cox regression analysis, significant reductions in relative risk were associated with having good performance status (relative risk [RR] = 0.68 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.56-0.83]; p < 0.001), being treated in the most recent interval (2000-2003) than in the first (1985-1989) (RR = 0.63 [95% CI = 0.44-0.88]; p = 0.007), with improved therapies, including induction chemotherapy plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy (RR = 0.68 [CI = 0.56-0.84]; p < 0.001), explaining the reductions.

Conclusion: Although fully delineated comparisons must await incorporation and study of data through 2007, this analysis suggests that multimodality management that has been adapted in recent years may be associated with the improvements in outcomes of these cases of largely stage II and III esophageal adenocarcinoma found at the gastroesophageal junction.

© 2009International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer

You currently do not have access to this article.

You may need to:

Note: If your society membership provides for full-access to this article, you may need to login on your society’s web site first.

Article Tools

You currently do not have access to this article.

You may need to:

Note: If your society membership provides for full-access to this article, you may need to login on your society’s web site first.

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.