Skip Navigation LinksHome > October 2012 - Volume 7 - Issue 10 > Radical Treatment of Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients wit...
Journal of Thoracic Oncology:
doi: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e318262caf6
Original Articles

Radical Treatment of Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients with Synchronous Oligometastases: Long-Term Results of a Prospective Phase II Trial (Nct01282450)

De Ruysscher, Dirk MD, PhD*#; Wanders, Rinus MD*; van Baardwijk, Angela MD, PhD*; Dingemans, Anne-Marie C. MD, PhD; Reymen, Bart MD*; Houben, Ruud MSc*; Bootsma, Gerben MD, PhD; Pitz, Cordula MD, PhD§; van Eijsden, Linda MD; Geraedts, Wiel MD; Baumert, Brigitta G. MD, PhD*; Lambin, Philippe MD, PhD*

Free Access
Article Outline
Collapse Box

Author Information

Departments of *Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO clinic), and Pulmonology, GROW—School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, University Medical Centre Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands; Department of Pulmonology, Atrium Medical Centre, Heerlen, The Netherlands; §Department of Pulmonology, Laurentius Hospital, Roermond, The Netherlands; Department of Pulmonology, St Jansgasthuis, Weert, The Netherlands; Department of Pulmonology, Orbis Medical Centre, Sittard, The Netherlands; and Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Leuvan/KU Leuven, Belgium.

Disclosure: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Address for correspondence: Dirk De Ruysscher, MD, PhD, Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Leuven, Herestraat 49, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium. E-mail: dirk.deruysscher@uzleven.be

Collapse Box

Abstract

Background: Stage IV non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with oligometastases (< 5 metastatic lesions) may experience long-term survival when all macroscopic tumor sites are treated radically, but no prospective data on NSCLCs with synchronous oligometastases are available.

Methods: A prospective single-arm phase II trial was conducted. The main inclusion criteria were pathologically proven NSCLC stage IV with less than five metastases at primary diagnosis, amendable for radical local treatment (surgery or radiotherapy). The study is listed in clinicaltrials.gov, number NCT01282450.

Results: Forty patients were enrolled, 39 of whom were evaluable (18 men, 21 women); mean age was 62.1 ± 9.2 years (range, 44–81). Twenty-nine (74%) had local stage III; 17 (44%) brain, seven (18%) bone, and four (10%) adrenal gland metastases. Thirty-five (87%) had a single metastatic lesion. Thirty-seven (95%) of the patients received chemotherapy as part of their primary treatment. Median overall survival (OS) was 13.5 months (95% confidence interval 7.6–19.4); 1-, 2-, and 3-year OS was 56.4%, 23.3%, and 17.5%, respectively. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 12.1 months (95% confidence interval 9.6–14.3); 1-year PFS was 51.3%, and both 2- and 3-year PFS was 13.6%. Only two patients (5%) had a local recurrence. No patient or tumor parameter, including volume and 18F-deoxyglucose uptake was significantly correlated with OS or PFS. The treatment was well tolerated.

Conclusion: In this phase II study, long-term PFS was found in a subgroup of NSCLC patients with synchronous oligometastases when treated radically. Identification of this favorable subgroup before therapy is needed.

Non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) continues to be the leading cause of cancer deaths.1 At diagnosis, approximately 50% of the patients have already overt disseminated cancer. These stage IV patients are generally considered to be incurable and are mostly treated palliatively. However, a transition between macroscopic local disease and multiple metastases (polymetastases) has been proposed and is referred to as oligometastases, being a limited number of metastases (usually <5), which also should be amenable for radical local therapy.2–5 The hypothesis is that patients with less than five distant metastases may be curable when all detectable disease can be treated radically with a local modality, that is, surgery or radiotherapy.

The widespread introduction of stereotactic radiotherapy (stereotactic body radiotherapy [SBRT] or stereotactic ablative radiotherapy [SABR]) and of minimally invasive sur gery has fuelled research in treating patients with oligometastases.6–23 Indeed, local control of metastases can be obtained in virtually all parts of the body with a low proportion of patients experiencing severe side effects. However, only a few prospective studies have been published.9–11,13,15 In these series, patients with several cancer sites have been included and both synchronous and metachronous metastases were studied. It is therefore not possible to separate the outcome of NSCLC from that of other tumors and to exclude the selection bias of the time distant metastases occur, although in retrospective series, subgroups of stage IV NSCLC patients may fare better than some stage III patients.16 In the absence of prospective data in NSCLC with synchronous oligometastases, we launched a single-arm prospective phase II trial to investigate whether it would be possible to obtain a significant 2- and 3-year survival in these patients when treated radically.

Back to Top | Article Outline

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion criteria were: histologically or cytologically proven NSCLC, Union International Centre le Cancer (UICC) stage IV (6th edition)24 with less than five metastases at the time of diagnosis. All tumor sites (local, regional, and distant) had to be amenable for radical treatment (surgery or radiotherapy to a biological dose25 of at least 60 Gy in 30 daily fractions of 2 Gy, except for brain metastases in which lower radiation doses were allowed) according to the multidisciplinary team. Both surgery and radiotherapy were allowed in the same patient (e.g., radiotherapy as local treatment for the local N3-IIIB disease and surgery for a solitary adrenal metastasis). Systemic treatment was not mandatory. There were no size limitations to the primary tumor or its metastases. Intracranial metastases alone were allowed. Patients had to have a World Health Organization (WHO) performance status 0 to 2 and any other malignancy should be controlled, that is, in clinical complete remission, at the time of diagnosis. The exclusion criteria were: not NSCLC or mixed NSCLC and other histologies (e.g., small-cell carcinoma), and a T4 tumor because of a malignant pleural or pericardial effusion.

Back to Top | Article Outline
Endpoints

The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) at 2 and 3 years. The secondary endpoints were, progression-free survival (PFS), dyspnea, dysphagia, and patterns of recurrence.

Back to Top | Article Outline
Staging

Patients were staged with a calibrated26 whole-body 18F-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography computed tomography (CT) scan and a CT with intravenous contrast or a contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the brain. Pathological confirmation of at least one distant metastasis was mandatory; for brain metastases, this was done only when the multidisciplinary team considered this diagnosis as most likely.

Back to Top | Article Outline
Comorbidity

Comorbidity at the time of diagnosis was scored using the Charlson comorbidity index.27

Back to Top | Article Outline
Treatment

Treatment of the primary tumor and the hilar and mediastinal lymph nodes. Loco-regional treatment was previously described and included image and dose-quality control.28,29 Patients with local stage T1-3 N0-1 disease were offered a lobectomy and a lobe-specific nodal dissection, stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) or more fractionated radiotherapy for central lesions. Patients with local stage III (T4 and/or N2-3) NSCLC received either sequential of concurrent individualized iso-toxic chemoradiotherapy.28,29

Radiotherapy dose was specified according to International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements (ICRU) 50 guidelines30 and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer recommendations were used.31

Treatment of distant metastases. Patients with brain metastases were either treated with resection followed by whole-brain radiotherapy to a dose of 30 Gy in 10 daily fractions of 3 Gy, or with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) to a dose of 18 to 20 Gy per one fraction or 24 Gy per three fractions, depending on the volume and the location of the brain metastase(s).32 No prophylactic whole-brain irradiation was given after SRS.

When surgery was considered in case of extracranial metastases, a radical resection was envisaged. In case of a microscopic incomplete resection, postoperative radiotherapy was given to a dose of 60 Gy in 30 fractions in 6 weeks to the areas at risk.

The timing and sequencing treatment (e.g., first radiotherapy, then surgery…) was not specified in the protocol and left to the discretion of the multidisciplinary group. Systemic treatment was not mandatory, but was considered to be the standard in stage IV patients. When a recurrence developed, the treatment was left at the discretion of the physician.

Post-treatment follow-up. The follow-up after all therapy consisted of a visit after 3 weeks and thereafter every 3 months, comprising history taking and physical examination; these were performed by the pulmonologist and radiation oncologist for the first 2 years. After this period, visits were performed every 6 months until 5 years post-treatment. A CT scan of the thorax and the upper abdomen and of the treated metastatic site was performed 3 and 6 months after completion of treatment and every 6 months thereafter. In case of brain metastases, a contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging scan of the brain was done every 3 months. At the time of first recurrence, additional diagnostic imaging procedures was left at the decision of the physician, as indicated by the presence of symptoms. A pathological confirmation of recurrence was not required.

Local tumor control of all radical treated locations (both the primary tumor and the metastases) was evaluated according to the criteria of Green33 after radiotherapy and according to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors for nonirradiated sites.34 Tumor progression was scored when one or both occurred.

Toxicity was scored according to the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) 3.0 criteria (http://ctep.cancer.gov) before the start of therapy, at the weekly visits during treatment, and at the follow-up visits mentioned above by the physician and by the patient, the latter from 2009 onward.

Statistics. We hypothesized that the 2-year survival with this radical therapy should be at least 20% with a one-sided 95% confidence interval (CI) not including 10% being the benchmark of 2-year survival with chemotherapy only.35 A sample size of 40 patients would be sufficient for this purpose.

Results are either expressed as mean ± SD with the range within parentheses or as a proportion with 95% CI. OS and PFS rates were calculated with the Kaplan–Meier method, on an intention-to-treat basis, starting from the date of diagnosis. OS and PFS comparisons were done using a log-rank test, and for multiple variables a Cox regression analysis was performed using SPSS 17.0.

Ethics. The trial was approved by the required authorities and all patients gave informed consent. The study is listed in clinicaltrials.gov, number NCT01282450.

Back to Top | Article Outline

RESULTS

Patients

Forty patients were included from July 27, 2006 until July 23, 2010, with one patient being ineligible. Analysis was performed on December 5, 2011. One patient was excluded from the analysis because of a protocol violation (61-year-old man with a small-cell lung cancer stage T1N3M1, with a solitary symptomatic brain metastasis, treated with resection, followed by whole-brain irradiation therapy (WBRT) and concurrent cisplatin-etoposide and chest radiotherapy to a dose of 70 Gy. He is free of disease progression at 2 years). Patient and tumor characteristics are depicted in Table 1.

Table 1
Table 1
Image Tools

A biopsy of the primary tumor was available in 18 of 39 patients (46%); in the remaining patients, only cytological material was obtained. As determination of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation status was not required and was not standard of care when the study began; this was only obtained in patients in patients with recurrent adenocarcinoma and only at the time when erlotinib became available. The EGFR mutation status was determined in three of 39 patients. In one of these, an exon 21 mutation was found and the patient was treated with erlotinib at relapse. Local stage (thus ignoring the M1 status) was I or II in 10 of 39 patients, stage IIIA in nine (23.1%), and IIIB in 20 (51.3%).

The brain was the most frequent location of metastases (17 of 39 patients or 43.9%), followed by the bone (7 of 39, 17.9%), and adrenal gland (4 of 39, 10.3%). The overwhelming majority of patients were diagnosed with a single distant metastasis (34 of 39, 87.2%).

For the whole patient group, the mean volumes were: primary tumor: 92.3 ± 122.7 cm3 (0–583.5) (median 51.9 cm3), lymph nodes: 44.2 ± 57.9 cm3 (0–238.8) (median 23.5 cm3), distant metastasis: 20.2 ± 27.4 cm3 (0.3–113.1) (median 9.9 cm3), total tumor volume 144.3 ± 138.9 cm3 (9.5–696.5) (median 117.9 cm3).

The mean maximal standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of the primary tumor was 11.9 ± 5.7 (2.1–27) (median 10.2). Excluding brain metastases because of high physiological cerebral 18F-deoxyglucose uptake, the mean SUVmax of metastases was 6.7 ± 3.3 (2.3–14.4) (median 5.8).

Back to Top | Article Outline
Treatment

The primary tumor and its regional lymph nodes were treated with radiotherapy or chemoradiation, none with surgery (Table 2). One primary tumor was treated with SBRT to a dose of 54 Gy in three fractions. Only two patients did not receive chemotherapy, one with stage T3N0 with one rib metastasis and one 82-old-man with a T2N2 tumor with a metastasis in the left major teres muscle. These two patients had a distant recurrence.

Table 2
Table 2
Image Tools

Three of the four patients with adrenal metastases were treated with surgery, and one was treated with radiotherapy because of irresectability (Table 3). All patients with bone metastases were treated with radiotherapy (54 Gy in 30 twice-daily fractions of 1.8 Gy). Four of 17 patients with brain metastases were surgically treated, and the rest were treated with SRS. Resection was performed in the patients with a solitary liver, a contralateral lung, and an ovarian metastasis.

Table 3
Table 3
Image Tools
Back to Top | Article Outline
Survival

With a median follow-up of 27.7 ± 10.5 months (mean 28.3 months; minimum 16.7 months, maximum 46.1 months), the median OS was 13.5 months (95% CI 7.6–19.4) (Fig. 1). The 1-year OS was 56.4%, the 2-year 23.3%, and the 3-year 17.5%.

Figure 1
Figure 1
Image Tools

The median PFS was 12.1 months (95% CI 9.6–14.3) (Fig. 2). The 1-year PFS was 51.3%, both the 2- and 3-year PFS 13.6%. When split-up according to the location of the metastases, the median survival for adrenal locations was 10.2 months, for bone 13.5 months, for brain 13.6 months, and for muscle 5.5 months (p = 0.52).

Figure 2
Figure 2
Image Tools
Back to Top | Article Outline
Patterns of Recurrence

At the time of analysis, 6 patients (15.4%) of patients did not show a recurrence (Table 4). Of the 33 patients with a recurrence, 31 (79.5%) had the recurrence outside the radiotherapy field (= planning target volume) or the surgical bed and two (5.1%) in-field (primary lung tumor in a T3N3M1 NSCLC and mediastinal lymph nodes (T2N3M1).

Table 4
Table 4
Image Tools
Back to Top | Article Outline
Toxicity

Determined by the physician. The incidence of acute grade 3 oesophagitis was 15%, with only one patient still having grade 1 oesophagitis 3 months post-treatment. Three months after therapy, only three of /39 patients had grade 2 dyspnea (compared with 2 of 39 at baseline).

Grade 3 cough only occurred in one patient, but 3 months after therapy, no patient had cough of grade 2 or more (Table 5). After brain surgery, SRS, or other treatment of distant metastases, no toxicity of grade 3 or more was observed. One patient showed paresis grade 2, one seizures grade 2, two sensory neuropathy grade 2, two dizziness grade 1, and two headache grade 2. No side effects of grade 2 or more remained 2 months post-treatment.

Table 5
Table 5
Image Tools

Determined by the patient. Twenty-three percent reported transient grade 3 esophagitis with no severe esophagitis 3 months after therapy (Table 6). No grade 3 dyspnea or cough occurred. Three months after EGFR, 31% of the patients reported having a better health status as opposed to baseline and 15% reported a worse health status. The proportion having a deterioration of health status after six months was 31%, correlating with cancer recurrence. There were no changes in mobility, self-care, activities of daily living, or mood over time.

Table 6
Table 6
Image Tools

Second-line treatment after recurrence. After a recurrence was diagnosed, nine patients (27.3%) only received best supportive care, mainly because of a bad general condition, seven (21.2%) were treated with chemotherapy only, and the rest received different treatments (Table 7).

Table 7
Table 7
Image Tools

Variables associated with OS and PFS. The following parameters were analyzed: volume of the primary tumor, volume of the nodes, volume of the metastases, total tumor volume, SUVmax of the primary tumor and of the nonbrain metastases, local stage, WHO performance status, comorbidity score, location of metastases, number of metastases, histological type, sex, age, and sequential versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy. None of these variables showed a correlation with OS or PFS, although a trend was noticed for the volume of the metastasis and OS (Table 8). The characteristics of the patients showing no disease progression are summarized in Table 9.

Table 9
Table 9
Image Tools
Table 8
Table 8
Image Tools
Back to Top | Article Outline

DISCUSSION

Patients with distant metastases of NSCLC were deemed incurable and classified as having stage IV disease.24 The observation that individuals with solitary lung or liver metastases may show long-term disease-free survival and even cure provided support for the concept of oligometastases2,3,21,22 Patients with one to five distant metastases may be at a continuum between truly local disease and widely disseminated cancer. Radical local therapy may thus be able to cure a subset of these patients.

Data on patients with NSCLC are scarce. Most series are retrospective and the few prospective trials include synchronous and metachronous metastases that are amendable for SBRT or limited surgery.13–15,23 Nevertheless, long-term survival was also observed in NSCLC.13–16,23

Because of these uncertainties, we started a prospective single-arm phase II trial in 2006 for patients with synchronous oligometastases from NSCLC. Although three quarters of the patients had local stage III disease, the 2- and 3-year OS was 23.3% and 17.5%, respectively. Even more important, both the 2- and 3-year PFS was 13.6%. Although a straightforward comparison with patients with stage IV NSCLC treated with chemotherapy only is not allowed, these results compare well with the latter group, in which a median PFS of typically 4 months is described.35

The present study has shortcomings. Because it was a nonrandomized trial, the real possible benefit of radical local therapy over chemotherapy alone remains uncertain although the observation that six of 39 (15%) patients in our study did not show disease progression after 2 years is suggestive that a subgroup of these patients may be cured or enjoy a long-lasting PFS. The acute toxicity was as expected with these treatments,28,29 but fortunately long-term side effects were rarely observed and not severe, even in the subgroup of patients with self-reported toxicity scores. This is in line with previous reports on chemoradiotherapy on the quality of life of lung cancer patients.36

Another caveat of the study is the obvious patient selection. Before embarking on this trial, we investigated the incidence of oligometastases in our referral region, covering 853 553 inhabitants on January 1, 2006. From the 450 newly diagnosed patients with lung cancer, about 50% had stage IV disease at diagnosis and 25 patients with NSCLC per year would have been eligible for our trial (data not shown). Nineteen of these 25 patients had local stage III NSCLC. In the 4 years’ accrual period of this subsequent study, only 39 patients were enrolled, compared with the 100 who would theoretically be eligible. The included patients were much younger and in a better general condition with fewer comorbidities than the average NSCLC patient in our region.37 The majority were women, which is also discordant with the population average with a preponderance of men.37 Moreover, nearly all patients (34 of 39) had only one distant metastasis although according to the inclusion criteria up to four metastases could have been included. In some favorable subgroups of patients with brain metastases, long-term survival may indeed be achieved.38,39

Nevertheless, to the best of our knowledge this is the first prospective trial on NSCLC patients with synchronous distant metastases treated radically, and it does show a small but significant group of long-term survivors. Hasselle et al.14 reported on a group of NSCLC patients that was more heterogeneous than ours because the possibility for hypofractionated radiotherapy was an inclusion criterion and both synchronous and metachronous metastases were allowed, like in the study of Cheruvu et al.16 Our series come close to the inclusion criteria of Khan et al.,5 although their series was retrospective. These differences may account for the diverging OS and PFS rates, but all support long-term PFS and OS.

The first site of progression is only in 5% of the patients in the high-dose radiotherapy volume or in radically resected sites. Most patients recur at distant sites. However, the brain represents a special case because nine of 17 patients with brain metastases had a cerebral recurrence at sites remote from the SRS field. Although randomized studies did not show a survival benefit of prophylactic WBRT after SRS over SRS alone,32,40 WBRT may be worth investigating in selected subgroups.

We believe that the future is to identify specific genetic characteristics that underlie the oligometastastic feature and the combination of specific agents with local treatment of metastases. A recent example of the former is the identification of MiRNA 200c that is involved in the epithelial to mesenchymal transformation.41 For the latter, the rational combination of targeted agents with radiotherapy42,43 may well be a unique opportunity to eradicate distant metastases not only because of inhibition of driving mutations, but at the same time also because of the induction of specific antitumor immunity.44 In conclusion, radical treatment of NSCLC patients with synchronous oligometastases is associated with long-term PFS.

Back to Top | Article Outline

REFERENCES

1. Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 2012;62:10–29

2. Hellman S, Weichselbaum RR. Oligometastases. J Clin Oncol. 1995;13:8–10

3. Weichselbaum RR, Hellman S. Oligometastases revisited. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2011;8:378–382

4. Oh Y, Taylor S, Bekele BN, et al. Number of metastatic sites is a strong predictor of survival in patients with non-small cell lung cancer with or without brain metastases. Cancer. 2009;115:2930–2938

5. Khan AJ, Mehta PS, Zusag TW, et al. Long term disease-free survival resulting from combined modality management of patients presenting with oligometastatic, non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). Radiother Oncol. 2006;81:163–167

6. Lo SS, Fakiris AJ, Chang EL, et al. Stereotactic body radiation therapy: a novel treatment modality. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2010;7:44–54

7. Timmerman RD, Bizekis CS, Pass HI, et al. Local surgical, ablative, and radiation treatment of metastases. CA Cancer J Clin. 2009;59:145–170

8. Siva S, MacManus M, Ball D. Stereotactic radiotherapy for pulmonary oligometastases: a systematic review. J Thorac Oncol. 2010;5:1091–1099

9. Rusthoven KE, Kavanagh BD, Burri SH, et al. Multi-institutional phase I/II trial of stereotactic body radiation therapy for lung metastases. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:1579–1584

10. Rusthoven KE, Kavanagh BD, Cardenes H, et al. Multi-institutional phase I/II trial of stereotactic body radiation therapy for liver metastases. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:1572–1578

11. Lee MT, Kim JJ, Dinniwell R, et al. Phase I study of individualized stereotactic body radiotherapy of liver metastases. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:1585–1591

12. Milano MT, Katz AW, Schell MC, Philip A, Okunieff P. Descriptive analysis of oligometastatic lesions treated with curative-intent stereotactic body radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008;72:1516–1522

13. Milano MT, Katz AW, Zhang H, Okunieff P. Oligometastases treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy: long-term follow-up of prospective study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012;83:878–886

14. Hasselle MD, Haraf DJ, Rusthoven KE, et al. Hypofractionated image-guided radiation therapy for patients with limited volume metastatic non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2012;7:376–381

15. Salama JK, Hasselle MD, Chmura SJ, et al. Stereotactic body radiotherapy for multisite extracranial oligometastases: final report of a dose escalation trial in patients with 1 to 5 sites of metastatic disease. Cancer. 2012;118:2962–2970

16. Cheruvu P, Metcalfe SK, Metcalfe J, Chen Y, Okunieff P, Milano MT. Comparison of outcomes in patients with stage III versus limited stage IV non-small cell lung cancer. Radiat Oncol. 2011;6:80

17. Brown RE, Bower MR, Martin RC. Hepatic resection for colorectal liver metastases. Surg Clin North Am. 2010;90:839–852

18. Mahmoud N, Bullard Dunn K. Metastasectomy for stage IV colorectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2010;53:1080–1092

19. Al-Asfoor A, Fedorowicz Z, Lodge M. Resection versus no intervention or other surgical interventions for colorectal cancer liver metastases. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008:CD006039

20. Sternberg DI, Sonett JR. Surgical therapy of lung metastases. Semin Oncol. 2007;34:186–196

21. Van Raemdonck D, Friedel G. The European Society of Thoracic Surgeons lung metastasectomy project. J Thorac Oncol. 2010;5(6 Suppl 2):S127–S129

22. Treasure T, Fallowfield L, Lees B, Farewell V. Pulmonary metastasectomy in colorectal cancer: the PulMiCC trial. Thorax. 2012;67:185–187

23. Pfannschmidt J, Dienemann H. Surgical treatment of oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer. 2010;69:251–258

24. Sobin LH, Wittekind CH. International Union Against Cancer (UICC). TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours. 20026th Ed New York, NY Wiley-Liss

25. Partridge M, Ramos M, Sardaro A, Brada M. Dose escalation for non-small cell lung cancer: analysis and modelling of published literature. Radiother Oncol. 2011;99:6–11

26. Boellaard R, Oyen WJ, Hoekstra CJ, et al. The Netherlands protocol for standardisation and quantification of FDG whole body PET studies in multi-centre trials. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2008;35:2320–2333

27. Charlson M, Szatrowski TP, Peterson J, Gold J. Validation of a combined comorbidity index. J Clin Epidemiol. 1994;47:1245–1251

28. van Baardwijk A, Wanders S, Boersma L, et al. Mature results of an individualized radiation dose prescription study based on normal tissue constraints in stages I to III non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:1380–1386

29. De Ruysscher D, van Baardwijk A, Steevens J, et al. Individualised isotoxic accelerated radiotherapy and chemotherapy are associated with improved long-term survival of patients with stage III NSCLC: a prospective population-based study. Radiother Oncol. 2012;102:228–233

30. ICRU Report 50. . Prescribing, Recording, and Reporting Photon Beam Therapy. Bethesda, MD: International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements,. 1993

31. De Ruysscher D, Faivre-Finn C, Nestle U, et al. European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer recommendations for planning and delivery of high-dose, high-precision radiotherapy for lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:5301–5310

32. Kocher M, Soffietti R, Abacioglu U, et al. Adjuvant whole-brain radiotherapy versus observation after radiosurgery or surgical resection of one to three cerebral metastases: results of the EORTC 22952-26001 study. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:134–141

33. Green MR, Ginsberg R, Ardizzoni A, et al. Induction therapy for stage III NSCLC: a consensus report. Lung Cancer. 1994;11 Suppl 3:S9–10

34. Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA, et al. New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000;92:205–216

35. Schiller JH, Harrington D, Belani CP, et al.Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Comparison of four chemotherapy regimens for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:92–98

36. Pijls-Johannesma M, Houben R, Boersma L, et al. High-dose radiotherapy or concurrent chemo-radiation in lung cancer patients only induces a temporary, reversible decline in QoL. Radiother Oncol. 2009;91:443–448

37. De Ruysscher D, Botterweck A, Dirx M, et al. Eligibility for concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy of locally advanced lung cancer patients: a prospective, population-based study. Ann Oncol. 2009;20:98–102

38. Tsao MN, Rades D, Wirth A, et al. Radiotherapeutic and surgical management for newly diagnosed brain metastasis(es): an American Society for Radiation Oncology evidence-based guideline. Prac Rad Oncol. 2012 In press

39. Sperduto PW, Kased N, Roberge D, et al. Summary report on the graded prognostic assessment: an accurate and facile diagnosis-specific tool to estimate survival for patients with brain metastases. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:419–425

40. Aoyama H, Shirato H, Tago M, et al. Stereotactic radiosurgery plus whole-brain radiation therapy vs stereotactic radiosurgery alone for treatment of brain metastases: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2006;295:2483–2491

41. Lussier YA, Xing HR, Salama JK, et al. MicroRNA expression characterizes oligometastasis(es). PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e28650

42. Koh PK, Faivre-Finn C, Blackhall FH, De Ruysscher D. Targeted agents in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): clinical developments and rationale for the combination with thoracic radiotherapy. Cancer Treat Rev. 2012;38:626–640

43. Kao J, Packer S, Vu HL, et al. Phase 1 study of concurrent sunitinib and image-guided radiotherapy followed by maintenance sunitinib for patients with oligometastases: acute toxicity and preliminary response. Cancer. 2009;115:3571–3580

44. Formenti SC, Demaria S. Systemic effects of local radiotherapy. Lancet Oncol. 2009;10:718–726

Non–small-cell lung cancer; Oligometastases; Radiotherapy; Chemotherapy; stage IV; Combined modality treatment; Individualized

Cited By:

This article has been cited 2 time(s).

Radiotherapy and Oncology
Treatment of multiple primary lung cancers using stereotactic radiotherapy, either with or without surgery
Griffioen, GHMJ; Lagerwaard, FJ; Haasbeek, CJA; Smit, EF; Slotman, BJ; Senan, S
Radiotherapy and Oncology, 107(3): 403-408.
10.1016/j.radonc.2013.04.026
CrossRef
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Extracranial Oligometastases: A Subset of Metastases Curable With Stereotactic Radiotherapy
Corbin, KS; Hellman, S; Weichselbaum, RR
Journal of Clinical Oncology, 31(): 1384-1390.
10.1200/JCO.2012.45.9651
CrossRef
Back to Top | Article Outline

© 2012International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer

Login

Article Tools

Images

Share

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.

Other Ways to Connect

Twitter
twitter.com/JTOonline

 



Visit JTO.org on your smartphone. Scan this code (QR reader app required) with your phone and be taken directly to the site.

 For additional oncology content, visit LWW Oncology Journals on Facebook.