Skip Navigation LinksHome > March 2007 - Volume 2 - Issue 3 > Apoptotic Signaling Pathways in Lung Cancer
Journal of Thoracic Oncology:
doi: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e318031cd78
Pathway of the Month

Apoptotic Signaling Pathways in Lung Cancer

Viktorsson, Kristina PhD*; Lewensohn, Rolf MD, PhD†

Free Access
Article Outline
Collapse Box

Author Information

*Department of Oncology-Pathology and †Karolinska Biomics Center, Karolinska Institutet and Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.

Disclosure: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Address for correspondence: Kristina Viktorsson, Unit of Medical Radiation Biology, Department of Oncology-Pathology, Cancer Centrum Karolinska R8:00, Karolinska Institutet, SE-171 76 Stockholm, Sweden. E-mail: Kristina.viktorsson@ki.se

Tumor cells may respond to chemo- or radiotherapy by activation of several cellular signaling cascades that influence cell survival and cell death, including activation of cell cycle arrest, senescence or triggering of several cell death types (i.e., mitotic catastrophe, necrosis, or apoptosis).1,2 However, tumor cells derived from solid tumors are often refractory to therapy or develop resistance during the treatment course. This is illustrated by non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), which shows a high degree of intrinsic resistance, and by small cell lung cancer (SCLC), which often develops resistance to treatment during the course of disease.3 In part, defective apoptotic signaling may contribute to chemo-resistance and radiotherapy resistance.1 However, it is also likely that other cell death modes (e.g., necrosis, autophagy, and mitotic catastrophe) and premature senescence are of equal importance for efficient tumor cell death in response to chemo- and radiotherapy.2 In this article, we give a brief overview of the main apoptotic signaling pathways and their deregulation in lung cancer (LC), and we provide some examples of apoptosis-based therapies.

Apoptosis is distinguished by some morphological characteristics (i.e., plasma membrane blebbing, cell shrinkage, condensation/fragmentation of the chromatin, and disintegration of the cell into apoptotic bodies). All these characteristics are effects of selective proteolysis of proteins involved in cell signaling, DNA repair, or structural maintenance of DNA integrity, carried out by caspases, a group of cystein-aspartate enzymes.4 Caspases are classified as initiator caspases (caspase-2, -8, -9, and -10 within human cells), which, upon activation, cleave and activate the second group, the effector caspases (mainly caspase-3, -6, and -7 within human cells), then perform selective proteolysis.4

Caspases are activated either by death receptor (DR) activation (extrinsic) or via mitochondrial release of apoptogenic proteins (e.g., cytochrome c, smac/DIABLO, and HtrA2/Omi) (intrinsic) (Figure 1). The signals propagated by the intrinsic pathway may also be generated in cell nuclei or lysosomes or within the endoplasmatic reticulum (Fig. 1).5–7

Figure 1
Figure 1
Image Tools

In the extrinsic caspase activation pathway, TNF superfamily ligands bind to DRs, causing oligomerization of DRs and recruitment of adaptor proteins via a death domain. In turn, adaptor proteins bind pro-caspase-8 via a death effector domain (DED) allowing pro-caspase-8 to be activated, an event that is critically dependent on the adaptor recruitment domain in the pro-caspase-8.8 Active caspase-8 then either activates pro-caspase-3 directly or amplifies the signal through Bid-cleavage (Figure 1).9 In the intrinsic pathway, apoptotic signals trigger increased mitochondrial outer membrane permeability (MOMP), followed by selective release of apoptogenic proteins from the mitochondrial inter membrane space to the cytosol (e.g., cytochrome c, Smac/DIABLO, and HtrA2/omi), all which promote caspase activation (Fig. 1).9 Cytosolic cytochrome c forms a complex with apoptosis protease-activating factor 1 (Apaf-1) and dATP (i.e., the apoptosome), in which the dimerization of pro-caspase-9 occurs, allowing its activation into caspase-9. This is followed by pro-caspase-3 activation.8 For these to efficiently result in apoptotic propagation, the concomitant alleviation of the caspase-blocking effect of inhibitor of apoptosis proteins (IAPs) is required. Hence, the release of Smac/DIABLO and HtrA2/omi, both which block IAPs and both which are released as a consequence of increased MOMP, leads to increased caspase-3 activity.9 In part, MOMP is controlled by Bcl-2 family proteins, and the anti-apoptotic members Bcl-xL and Bcl-2 both inhibit MOMP. Accordingly, pro-apoptotic members such as Bak or Bax, both which are activated by some BH3-only proteins (Bid, Bim, Bad, PUMA, and NOXA), can promote MOMP.10

An important regulator of mitochondria-mediated signaling is the tumor suppressor p53. Thus, p53 may induce expression of pro-apoptotic proteins (e.g., Bax, PUMA, Apaf-1) and/or repress anti-apoptotic proteins, including Bcl-2, in response to DNA damage.11 In addition, p53 can re-localize to cytosol and in the same way as BH3-only proteins trigger Bak and/or Bax activation.12,13

Back to Top | Article Outline

CASPASE ACTIVITY ADJUSTERS

Caspase activity can be restrained by inhibitor of apoptosis proteins (IAPs), by heat shock proteins (HSPs), or by changes in protein kinase signaling. Briefly, IAPs (cIAP-1,-2, XIAP, and survivin) cause a structural block within the substrate-binding pocket of caspases, which impede substrate binding and target the bound caspases for proteosomal degradation.14 HSPs (HSP90, HSP70, HSP60, and HSP27) can block caspase activity through sequestration of cytochrome c, inhibition of Bid redistribution, or Akt dephosphorylation or by blocking Apaf-1–mediated pro-caspase-9 or -3 activation.15

The phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3-K)/Akt-dependent pathway and the Ras-activated mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway both influence apoptotic propensity.16 Although Akt and MAPK/ERK mainly are activated by growth factors and inhibit pro-apoptotic signaling, the MAPKs p38 and JNK can also be activated in response to cellular stress (e.g., DNA damaging treatments) and be either pro- or anti-apoptotic depending on stimuli, duration, and cell type.16 Both Akt and ERK may inhibit Bad or caspase-9 or antagonize Bim.10,17,18 JNK is known to regulate cytochrome c release in part by promoting Bax /Bak activation or complex formation or by inhibiting Bcl-2/Bcl-xL.19–24 JNK also promotes expression of Bak, Bax, and Bim.25 In a similar way, p38 controls apoptotic signaling by antagonizing or promoting the Bcl-2 family proteins.26,27,28

Back to Top | Article Outline

ALTERATIONS IN APOPTOTIC SIGNALING PATHWAYS IN LUNG CANCER

Loss of pro-caspase-8, FasL, or DRs expression (i.e., FasR or TRAIL-receptor 1) is all reported in SCLC.29,30 Moreover, increased expression of c-FLIP, a non-cleavable homologue to caspase-8, was observed in SCLC.31 In a patient with NSCLC, material consisting of approximately 100 specimens, somatic mutations of TRAIL receptor 2 were found in approximately 10% of the patients.32 The TRAIL receptor 2 mutations reported were located in the death domain, a region required for appropriate apoptotic signaling.32 However, if the mutations in TRAIL receptor 2 influenced the patient response to chemo- or radiotherapy or overall survival remains to be examined. Decreased expression of Apaf-1 was reported in NSCLC tumors compared with normal lung, whereas pro-caspase-9 and -3 were up-regulated.33 Enhanced expression of pro-caspase-3 was associated with poor prognosis in resected NSCLC,34 whereas increased caspase-3 expression and/or activity was associated with increased survival in another study.35 The localization of Apaf-1 to nucleus was also reported to predict survival in patients with early-stage NSCLC.36

With respect to Bcl-2 family proteins, we reported that radioresistant NSCLC cells display no or little Bak or Bax activation compared with radiosensitive NSCLCs or SCLCs.37 The prognostic value of Bcl-2 for survival and/or chemo- or radiotherapy responses among patients with lung cancer was recently reviewed.38 Increased Bcl-2 expression was found in certain NSCLC subtypes and was proposed to have slightly good prognostic value.38 In the same report, Bax was found not to have any prognostic value, even for chemotherapy responses.38 The expression and prognostic value of IAPs and HSPs in NSCLC has also been reviewed.39 Briefly, c-IAP-1, XIAP, and survivin were reported to be differentially expressed in a panel of SCLC and NSCLC cell lines in a non-tumor type-dependent manner.40 In contrast, c-IAP-2 was expressed at a significantly higher level in NSCLC lines compared with SCLC lines.40 However, in a clinical LC material, c-IAP-1, -2, and XIAP were reported not to correlate to clinically related prognostic factors (e.g., tumor size, stage, histology, and grade) or to tumor chemotherapeutic response.41 In contrast, a high survivin expression was reported to correlate to poor prognosis and local control after radiotherapy.42 Analysis of HSP72 and HSP27 in human NSCLC and SCLC cell lines did not reveal any correlation to radiosensitivity in the cell line panel.43 When examining HSP27 and HSP70 in NSCLC clinical specimens, expression was found in 60% of the cases, and HSP70 expression was correlated to histopathological differentiation, clinical stages, smoking history, or lymph node metastasis.44

It is well established that lung cancer, especially NSCLC, is driven by increased growth factor signaling. Thus IGF-1R, EGF-R (erbB1), or K-Ras are all often over-expressed or constitutively active in NSCLC and/or SCLC and may cause increased anti-apoptotic signaling.45,46 Moreover, we have also shown that deficiency in activation of MAPKs such as JNK and/or p38 may also contribute to impaired radiation-induced apoptotic responses.37 Impeded JNK activity may result from increased expression of the phosphatase MKP1/CL100 within NSCLC cells.47

Back to Top | Article Outline

APOPTOSIS-BASED THERAPIES

Several concepts of increasing apoptotic signaling as a way to improve chemo- and radiotherapy responses have been introduced and are in preclinical development to allow clinical use or have entered into clinical trials.48,49 One way is to reactivate death receptor signaling; this strategy has been tested for therapeutic purposes.50,51 TNFα was the first choice, and although it was capable of causing tumor cell kill, adverse toxic side effects abolished clinical applicability.50 Instead, the TNFα-related apoptosis, inducing ligand TRAIL, which bind to TRAIL-R1 (DR4) and TRAIL-R2 (DR5/Killer), has shown promising results in the recombinant form alone or together with chemo- or radiotherapy.50 Another approach that has been examined in several preclinical studies is to use agonistic TRAIL receptor monoclonal antibodies (mAbs).51 Currently, phase I and II clinical trials with such mAbs directed against either DR4 (HGS-ETR1) or DR5 (HGS-ETR2) are ongoing for patients with NSCLC.51 Using a tumor-specific gene delivery of the TRAIL gene to NSCLC cells in a xenograft mouse model, Chang et al.52 recently showed a radiosensitizing effect involving induction of apoptotic signaling, inhibition of tumor growth, and prolonged survival of the tumor-bearing mice.

In preclinical lung cancer models, alleviation of IAP function using either antisense or siRNA or peptides mimicking the endogenous IAP inhibitor Smac has been tested either alone or in combination with chemo- or radiotherapy and have, to some extent, been promising.14,53–55 Strategies in which Bcl-2/Bcl-xL expression is inhibited or BH3-mimetics applied have also been introduced. Thus, antisense against Bcl-2 (Oblimersen) has been tested in NSCLC and other tumor types and has reached phase III trials.56,49 Mutations in the p53 gene, which impede its function as a transcriptional regulator of apoptosis, are common in both NSCLC and SCLC (50% and 70%, respectively).57 Hence, one alternative to revert chemo- or radiotherapy resistance in lung cancer may therefore be to restore p53 function. This has been clinically tested in NSCLC by using wildtype-p53 gene transfer either alone or in combination with chemotherapy.58 Preclinical development of peptides or small molecules that can reactivate mutant p53 is also ongoing.49 However, the clinical usefulness of such an approach awaits further studies.

Back to Top | Article Outline

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This study was supported by grants from the Swedish Cancer Society (to RL), the Stockholm Cancer Society (to RL and KV), and the Funds of the Karolinska Institutet.

Back to Top | Article Outline

REFERENCES

1.Johnstone RW, Ruefli AA, Lowe SW. Apoptosis: a link between cancer genetics and chemotherapy. Cell 2002;108:153–164.

2.Brown JM, Attardi LD. The role of apoptosis in cancer development and treatment response. Nat Rev Cancer 2005;5:231–237.

3.Joseph B, Lewensohn R, Zhivotovsky B. Role of apoptosis in the response of lung carcinomas to anti-cancer treatment. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2000;926:204–216.

4.Nicholson DW. Caspase structure, proteolytic substrates, and function during apoptotic cell death. Cell Death Different 1999;6:1028–1042.

5.Kroemer G, Jaattela M. Lysosomes and autophagy in cell death control. Nat Rev 2005;5:886–897.

6.Norbury CJ, Zhivotovsky B. DNA damage-induced apoptosis. Oncogene 2004;23:2797–2808.

7.Orrenius S, Zhivotovsky B, Nicotera P. Regulation of cell death: the calcium-apoptosis link. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2003;4:552–565.

8.Pop C, Timmer J, Sperandio S, Salvesen GS. The apoptosome activates caspase-9 by dimerization. Mol Cell 2006;22:269–275.

9.Garrido C, Galluzzi L, Brunet M, Puig PE, Didelot C, Kroemer G. Mechanisms of cytochrome c release from mitochondria. Cell Death Different 2006;13:1423–1433.

10.Puthalakath H, Strasser A. Keeping killers on a tight leash: transcriptional and post-translational control of the pro-apoptotic activity of BH3-only proteins. Cell Death Different 2002;9:505–512.

11.Vousden KH, Lu X. Live or let die: the cell’s response to p53. Nat Rev 2002;2:594–604.

12.Leu JI, Dumont P, Hafey M, Murphy ME, George DL. Mitochondrial p53 activates Bak and causes disruption of a Bak-Mcl1 complex. Nat Cell Biol 2004;6:443–450.

13.Chipuk JE, Kuwana T, Bouchier-Hayes L, et al. Direct activation of Bax by p53 mediates mitochondrial membrane permeabilization and apoptosis. Science 2004;303:1010–1014.

14.Schimmer AD. Inhibitor of apoptosis proteins: translating basic knowledge into clinical practice. Cancer Res 2004;64:7183–7190.

15.Parcellier A, Gurbuxani S, Schmitt E, Solary E, Garrido C. Heat shock proteins, cellular chaperones that modulate mitochondrial cell death pathways. Biochem Biophys Res Comm 2003;304:505–512.

16.Davis RJ. Signal transduction by the JNK group of MAP kinases. Cell 2000;103:239–252.

17.Ye K. PIKE GTPase-mediated nuclear signalings promote cell survival. Biochim Biophys Acta 2006;1761:570–576.

18.Greer EL, Brunet A. FOXO transcription factors at the interface between longevity and tumor suppression. Oncogene 2005;24:7410–7425.

19.Tournier C, Hess P, Yang DD, et al. Requirement of JNK for stress-induced activation of the cytochrome c-mediated death pathway. Science 2000;288:870–874.

20.Lei K, Davis RJ. JNK phosphorylation of Bim-related members of the Bcl2 family induces Bax-dependent apoptosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003;100:2432–2437.

21.Ihrlund LS, Hernlund E, Viktorsson K, et al. Two distinct steps of Bak regulation during apoptotic stress signaling: different roles of MEKK1 and JNK1. Exp Cell Res 2006;312:1581–1589.

22.Yamamoto K, Ichijo H, Korsmeyer SJ. BCL-2 is phosphorylated and inactivated by an ASK1/Jun N-terminal protein kinase pathway normally activated at G(2)/M. Mol Cell Biol 1999;19:8469–8478.

23.Donovan N, Becker EB, Konishi Y, Bonni A. JNK phosphorylation and activation of BAD couples the stress-activated signaling pathway to the cell death machinery. J Biol Chem 2002;277:40944–40949.

24.Kharbanda S, Saxena S, Yoshida K, et al. Translocation of SAPK/JNK to mitochondria and interaction with Bcl-x(L) in response to DNA damage. J Biol Chem 2000;275:322–327.

25.Papadakis ES, Finegan KG, Wang X, et al. The regulation of Bax by c-Jun N-terminal protein kinase (JNK) is a prerequisite to the mitochondrial-induced apoptotic pathway. FEBS Lett 2006;580:1320–1326.

26.Cai B, Chang S, Becker EB, Bonni A, Xia Z. p38 MAP kinase mediates apoptosis through phosphorylation of Bimel at Ser65. J Biol Chem 2006;281:28215–25222.

27.Grethe S, Coltella N, Di Renzo MF, Porn-Ares MI. p38 MAPK downregulates phosphorylation of Bad in doxorubicin-induced endothelial apoptosis. Biochem Biophys Res Comm 2006;347:781–790.

28.Choi SY, Kim MJ, Kang CM, et al. Activation of Bak and Bax through c-abl-protein kinase Cdelta-p38 MAPK signaling in response to ionizing radiation in human non-small cell lung cancer cells. J Biol Chem 2006;281:7049–7059.

29.Joseph B, Ekedahl J, Sirzen F, Lewensohn R, Zhivotovsky B. Differences in expression of pro-caspases in small cell and non-small cell lung carcinoma. Biochem Biophys Res Comm 1999;262:381–387.

30.Hopkins-Donaldson S, Ziegler A, Kurtz S, et al. Silencing of death receptor and caspase-8 expression in small cell lung carcinoma cell lines and tumors by DNA methylation. Cell Death Different 2003;10:356–364.

31.Shivapurkar N, Reddy J, Matta H, et al. Loss of expression of death-inducing signaling complex (DISC) components in lung cancer cell lines and the influence of MYC amplification. Oncogene 2002;21:8510–8514.

32.Lee SH, Shin MS, Kim HS, et al. Alterations of the DR5/TRAIL receptor 2 gene in non-small cell lung cancers. Cancer Res 1999;59:5683–5686.

33.Krepela E, Prochazka J, Fiala P, Zatloukal P, Selinger P. Expression of apoptosome pathway-related transcripts in non-small cell lung cancer. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2006;132:57–68.

34.Takata T, Tanaka F, Yamada T, et al. Clinical significance of caspase-3 expression in pathologic-stage I, nonsmall-cell lung cancer. Int J Cancer 2001;96(Suppl):54–60.

35.Volm M, Mattern J, Koomagi R. Inverse correlation between apoptotic (Fas ligand, caspase-3) and angiogenic factors (VEGF, microvessel density) in squamous cell lung carcinomas. Anticancer Res 1999;19:1669–1671.

36.Besse B, Cande C, Spano JP, et al. Nuclear localization of apoptosis protease activating factor-1 predicts survival after tumor resection in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2004;10:5665–5669.

37.Viktorsson K, Ekedahl J, Lindebro MC, et al. Defective stress kinase and Bak activation in response to ionizing radiation but not cisplatin in a non-small cell lung carcinoma cell line. Exp Cell Res 2003;289:256–264.

38.Zhu CQ, Shih W, Ling CH, Tsao MS. Immunohistochemical markers of prognosis in non-small cell lung cancer: a review and proposal for a multiphase approach to marker evaluation. J Clin Pathol 2006;59:790–800.

39.Fennell DA. Caspase regulation in non-small cell lung cancer and its potential for therapeutic exploitation. Clin Cancer Res 2005;11:2097–2105.

40.Ekedahl J, Joseph B, Grigoriev MY, et al. Expression of inhibitor of apoptosis proteins in small- and non-small-cell lung carcinoma cells. Exp Cell Res 2002;279:277–290.

41.Ferreira CG, van der Valk P, Span SW, et al. Assessment of IAP (inhibitor of apoptosis) proteins as predictors of response to chemotherapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients. Ann Oncol 2001;12:799–805.

42.Choi N, Baumann M, Flentjie M, et al. Predictive factors in radiotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer: present status. Lung Cancer 2001;31:43–56.

43.Ekedahl J, Joseph B, Marchetti P, et al. Heat shock protein 72 does not modulate ionizing radiation-induced apoptosis in U1810 non-small cell lung carcinoma cells. Cancer Biol Ther 2003;2:663–669.

44.Huang Q, Zu Y, Fu X, Wu T. Expression of heat shock protein 70 and 27 in non-small cell lung cancer and its clinical significance. J Huazhong 2005;25:693–695.

45.Reeve JG, Kirby LB, Brinkman A, Hughes SA, Schwander J, Bleehen NM. Insulin-like growth-factor-binding protein gene expression and protein production by human tumour cell lines. Int J Cancer 1992;51:818–821.

46.Arteaga CL. EGF receptor mutations in lung cancer: from humans to mice and maybe back to humans. Cancer Cell 2006;9:421–423.

47.Chattopadhyay S, Machado-Pinilla R, Manguan-Garcia C, et al. MKP1/CL100 controls tumor growth and sensitivity to cisplatin in non-small-cell lung cancer. Oncogene 2006;25:3335–3345.

48.Reed JC. Drug insight: cancer therapy strategies based on restoration of endogenous cell death mechanisms. Nat Clin Pract 2006;3:388–398.

49.Green DR, Kroemer G. Pharmacological manipulation of cell death: clinical applications in sight? J Clin Invest 2005;115:2610–2617.

50.Kelley SK, Ashkenazi A. Targeting death receptors in cancer with Apo2L/TRAIL. Curr Opin Pharmacol 2004;4:333–339.

51.Cretney E, Takeda K, Smyth MJ. Cancer: novel therapeutic strategies that exploit the TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL)/TRAIL receptor pathway. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 2007;39:280–286.

52.Zhang X, Cheung RM, Komaki R, Fang B, Chang JY. Radiotherapy sensitization by tumor-specific TRAIL gene targeting improves survival of mice bearing human non-small cell lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2005;11:6657–6668.

53.Yonesaka K, Tamura K, Kurata T, et al. Small interfering RNA targeting survivin sensitizes lung cancer cell with mutant p53 to adriamycin. Int J Cancer 2006;118:812–820.

54.Yang L, Mashima T, Sato S, et al. Predominant suppression of apoptosome by inhibitor of apoptosis protein in non-small cell lung cancer H460 cells: therapeutic effect of a novel polyarginine-conjugated Smac peptide. Cancer Res 2003;63:831–837.

55.Bartling B, Lewensohn R, Zhivotovsky B. Endogenously released Smac is insufficient to mediate cell death of human lung carcinoma in response to etoposide. Exp Cell Res 2004;298:83–95.

56.Herbst RS, Frankel SR. Oblimersen sodium (Genasense bcl-2 antisense oligonucleotide): a rational therapeutic to enhance apoptosis in therapy of lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2004;10:4245s–4248s.

57.Tammemagi MC, McLaughlin JR, Bull SB. Meta-analyses of p53 tumor suppressor gene alterations and clinicopathological features in resected lung cancers. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 1999;8:625–634.

58.Lebedeva IV, Su ZZ, Sarkar D, Fisher PB. Restoring apoptosis as a strategy for cancer gene therapy: focus on p53 and mda-7. Semin Cancer Biol 2003;13:169–178.

Cited By:

This article has been cited 3 time(s).

Annals of Oncology
Newer opportunities in systemic therapy of lung cancer
Rajan, A; Gutierrez, M; Giaccone, G
Annals of Oncology, 19(): 31-37.
10.1093/annonc/mdn445
CrossRef
Cell Death & Disease
Inhibition of Ephrin B3-mediated survival signaling contributes to increased cell death response of non-small cell lung carcinoma cells after combined treatment with ionizing radiation and PKC 412
Stahl, S; Kaminskyy, VO; Efazat, G; Vaculova, AH; Rodriguez-Nieto, S; Moshfegh, A; Lewensohn, R; Viktorsson, K; Zhivotovsky, B
Cell Death & Disease, 4(): -.
ARTN e454
CrossRef
Journal of Thoracic Oncology
RBM5 as a Putative Tumor Suppressor Gene for Lung Cancer
Sutherland, LC; Wang, K; Robinson, AG
Journal of Thoracic Oncology, 5(3): 294-298.
10.1097/JTO.0b013e3181c6e330
PDF (412) | CrossRef
Back to Top | Article Outline

© 2007International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer

Login

Article Tools

Images

Share

Other Ways to Connect

Twitter
twitter.com/JTOonline

 



Visit JTO.org on your smartphone. Scan this code (QR reader app required) with your phone and be taken directly to the site.

 For additional oncology content, visit LWW Oncology Journals on Facebook.