Skip Navigation LinksHome > January 2014 - Volume 9 - Issue 1 > Surgical Treatment in Patient with Non–Small-Cell Lung Cance...
Journal of Thoracic Oncology:
doi: 10.1097/JTO.0000000000000040
Original Articles

Surgical Treatment in Patient with Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer with Fissure Involvement: Anatomical versus Nonanatomical Resection

Leuzzi, Giovanni MD*; Cesario, Alfredo MD†‡; Cafarotti, Stefano MD§; Lococo, Filippo MD; Dall’Armi, Valentina; Novellis, Pierluigi MD; Romano, Rosalia MD; Siciliani, Alessandra MD; Meacci, Elisa MD; Granone, Pierluigi PhD; Margaritora, Stefano PhD

Collapse Box

Abstract

Objective:

Despite the intense debate concerning the prognostic impact of fissure involvement (FI) in patients with non–small-cell lung cancer, no specific surgical strategies have been yet recommended when this condition occurs. In this setting, we report our monocentric 10-years experience to investigate this issue.

Methods:

From January 2000 to January 2010, the clinical data of 40 non–small-cell lung cancer patients with FI undergoing curative resection were retrospectively reviewed. The sample was stratified according to the type of resection: group A (28 patients): anatomical resection (bilobectomy [21 patients], pneumonectomy [7 patients]); group B (12 patients): nonanatomical resection (lobectomy plus wedge resection [LWR]). The end-points were (1) impact of different surgical approach on the pulmonary function (measured before surgery and 1 month after discharge); (2) disease-specific survival; and (3) tumor recurrence.The t test, χ2, and log-rank tests, Kaplan–Meier method, and Cox and logistic regression analyses were used for the statistical analysis.

Results:

No differences between the two groups were found when comparing the clinical characteristics, histology, pN or pT status, p-stage, residual (R1) disease, tumor grading, or tumor size. Similarly, the baseline preoperative function (tested as forced expiratory volume in 1 second-%-predicted, FEV1%) was likewise comparable (92.5% ± 21.0% in group A versus 85.2% ± 20.0% in group B; p = not significant). The decline of FEV1% after surgery was slightly higher in group A (−24.9% ± 13.5%) when compared with that in group B (−19.5% ± 13.3%), but this difference was not statistically significant (p = ns). Nevertheless, the 5-year disease-specific survival was 56% for group A and 47% for group B (p = ns). The recurrence rate did not differ between the patients undergoing a LWR (3 of 12 patients) and those undergoing a bilobectomy or pneumonectomy (9 of 28 patients) (p = ns). The presence of FI extended for more than 3 cm was found to be the most significant prognostic factor when analyzing survival (p = 0.002) and recurrence rate (p< 0.001).

Conclusions:

Our results suggest that nonanatomical resection (LWR) could be considered as a feasible surgical option (especially in “frail” patients with an extent of FI less than 3 cm) in the light of the similar oncological and functional outcome compared with anatomical resection. Further studies based on larger series are needed to confirm these preliminary data and also to investigate the impact on the postoperative quality of life.

Copyright © 2013 by the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer

Login

Article Tools

Share

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.

Other Ways to Connect

Twitter
twitter.com/JTOonline

 



Visit JTO.org on your smartphone. Scan this code (QR reader app required) with your phone and be taken directly to the site.

 For additional oncology content, visit LWW Oncology Journals on Facebook.