Institutional members access full text with Ovid®

Share this article on:

Long-term Sequelae of Patients With Retained Drains in Spine Surgery

Gausden, Elizabeth B. MD*; Sama, Andrew A. MD; Taher, Fadi MD; Pumberger, Matthias MD; Cammisa, Frank P. MD; Hughes, Alexander P. MD

Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques: February 2015 - Volume 28 - Issue 1 - p 37–39
doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e31826983ad
Case Reports

Study Design: Case series.

Objective: To assess sequelae of retained surgical drains in patients undergoing spine surgery.

Summary of Background Data: Although a rare event, surgical drains may break either before or during removal attempts. In cases of retained surgical drains, the patient and surgeon are left with a decision of either surgically removing the drain fragment, or leaving it in situ. There is a paucity of literature that pertains to this unusual complication of spine surgery and its effect on long-term outcome.

Methods: Cases of retained drain fragments that occurred at the spine service of a single institution between January 1, 1990 and December 31, 2008 were identified using the institutional electronic billing system, International Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems-9 codes, and surgeons’ records.

Results: Seven cases of retained drains were identified to have occurred during the study period. Five of the patients underwent a subsequent operation for drain removal without complications, whereas 2 patients elected to leave the drain in situ. At a minimum of 2-year follow-up, neither of the patients in which the drain fragment had been left in situ reported complications or sequelae related to the drain fragment, and radiographic imaging showed no distinct migration of the fragment within the soft tissue.

Conclusions: The 2 reported cases with a retained drain fragment left in situ support published and anecdotal opinions on retained soft-tissue drains not adversely affecting long-term patient outcome. In cases of asymptomatic patients with retained drains within soft tissue, leaving the fragment in situ is a treatment option that deserves consideration.

*Weill Cornell Medical College

Spine Surgery Service, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY

Centrum fur Muskuloskeletale Chirurgie, Charite, Berlin, Germany

Supported internally by the Spine Surgery Service at Hospital for Special Surgery.

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Reprints: Elizabeth B. Gausden, MD, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Spine Surgery Service, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY 10021 (e-mail: gausdene@hss.edu).

Received March 5, 2012

Accepted July 12, 2012

Copyright © 2015 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.