Skip Navigation LinksHome > Published Ahead-of-Print > Assessment of Rib Hump Deformity Correction in Adolescent Id...
Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques:
doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3182745f51
Original Article: PDF Only

Assessment of Rib Hump Deformity Correction in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis With or Without Costoplasty Using the Double Rib Contour Sign.

Lykissas, Marios G. MD, PhD; Sharma, Vivek MD; Crawford, Alvin H. MD, FACS

Published Ahead-of-Print
Collapse Box


Study Design: Level III; Therapeutic study.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine whether the addition of costoplasty in AIS surgery improved correction of the rib hump deformity.

Background: Trunk deformity is comprised of vertebral rotation, posterior vertebral element, and rib deformities. Surgical correction of the rotational deformity has been performed by segmental spinal instrumentation with vertebral derotation, but complete correction of the rib hump by derotation is rarely achieved.

Methods: A multi-center registry database for AIS was reviewed with the inclusion criteria of Lenke type I curves treated with posterior spinal fusion with or without costoplasty, instrumented with pedicle screws or hybrid constructs, with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. The first group (Group I) was treated with pedicle screws, direct vertebral rotation and no costoplasty while the second group (Group II) was treated with pedicle screws, vertebral rotation and costoplasty. The rib index (RI), calculated from the double rib contour sign (DRCS), and Cobb angle were measured radiographically and compared between groups.

Results: The groups were comprised 36 subjects in Group I and 40 subjects in Group II. The mean preoperative Cobb angles for groups I and II were 49.7[degrees] and 49.8[degrees], respectively, while the mean postoperative Cobb angles were 10.2[degrees], and 10.9[degrees], respectively. There was no difference in preoperative as well as postoperative values when comparing both groups (P=0.48 and P=0.96, respectively). Before spine surgery, RI for groups I and II was 1.61, and 1.80, respectively. Postoperatively, the rib indices were 1.39 for Group I and 1.29 for Group II. These differences were found to be statistically significant (P=0.002 and P=0.006, respectively). The amounts of correction of RI were 0.23 and 0.51 for groups I and II, respectively. This difference was found to be statistically significant (P<0.0001). The correction percentages were 13.7% and 28.3%, respectively. This difference was also found to be statistically significant (P<0.0001).

Conclusions: Costoplasty combined with pedicle screws and vertebral derotation, may significantly improve rib hump deformity as opposed to pedicle screws and vertebral derotation alone.

Copyright (C) 2015 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

Follow Us!


Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.