Home Current Issue Previous Issues Published Ahead-of-Print For Authors Journal Info
Skip Navigation LinksHome > August 2012 - Volume 25 - Issue 6 > Claustrophobia: A Proxy For Psychological Distress in Patien...
Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques:
doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e318220a248
Original Articles

Claustrophobia: A Proxy For Psychological Distress in Patients With Back Pain

Kerr, Hui-Ling MBBS, MRCS, BSc; Dabke, Harshad V. FRCS Orth; Collins, Iona E. FRCS Orth; Grevitt, Michael FRCS Orth

Collapse Box

Abstract

Study Design: Case-control study.

Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the levels of psychological distress in patients with back pain who expressed claustrophobia at the time of their magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan, compared with sex and age-matched normal controls who did not exhibit claustrophobia. The secondary aim was to document the level of disability and intervention rates in this group.

Summary of Background Data: Psychosocial factors influence the outcomes of low back pain treatment with psychological distress being associated with poorer surgical outcomes in patients with low back pain. Up to 14% of patients experience claustrophobia during MRI scans requiring sedation to complete the scan. The effect of claustrophobia on back pain disability and outcomes has not been previously reported.

Methods: Twenty females and 13 males all requiring MRI scan under sedation for claustrophobia (group 1) were compared with an age and sex-matched cohort that had MRI scan without sedation (group 2). Both groups were drawn from a chronic back clinic. Average age in both groups was 54 years (range, 27 to 79 y). Both groups had standard conservative therapy, together with psychometric evaluation: Zung Depression Index and Modified Somatic Perception Questionnaire. Disability was measured by Oswestry Disability Index. Primary outcome measures were intervention rates (surgery, injections, and physiotherapy sessions) and prevalence of psychological distress.

Results: Mean Zung Depression Index in group 1 was significantly higher than in group 2 (59.5 vs. 28.9, P<0.05) as was the mean Modified Somatic Perception Questionnaire score (13.3 vs. 9.2, P<0.05.) Prevalence of psychological distress was higher in group 1 (75.8% vs. 18.2%, P<0.05). Oswestry Disability Index was the same in both groups (50% vs. 48%). Group 1 had 13 interventions (13 patients=39.4%) compared with 26 in group 2 (26 patients=78.8%) (P< 0.05). Twenty-two patients (66.7%) in group 1 were discharged after their MRI scan with no intervention compared with 7 patients (21.2%) in group 2 (P<0.05).

Conclusions: Claustrophobic patients with back pain showed higher levels of depression than nonclaustrophobic patients, with a higher rate of psychological distress. Disability, however, was not higher. The majority of claustrophobic patients did not require surgical intervention. The reasons for this are unclear and require further investigation. Claustrophobia requiring sedation for MRI scans may be a proxy for psychological distress in these patients and psychometric testing is advised during assessment to help with surgical decision making.

© 2012 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.

Follow Us!

Login

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.