Reconsideration of the Costs of Convenience: Quality, Operational, and Fiscal Strategies to Minimize Elective Labor InductionSimpson, Kathleen Rice PhD, RNC, FAANJournal of Perinatal & Neonatal Nursing: January/March 2010 - Volume 24 - Issue 1 - p 43–52 doi: 10.1097/JPN.0b013e3181c6abe3 Feature Articles: CONTINUING EDUCATION Abstract Author Information Elective induction of labor is at an all-time high in the United States despite known associated risks. It can lead to birth of an infant too early, a long labor, exposure to a high-alert medication with its potential side effects, unnecessary cesarean birth, and maternal and neonatal morbidity. There is a cascade of interventions related to elective induction such as an intravenous line, continuous electronic fetal monitoring, confinement to bed, amniotomy, pharmacologic labor stimulating agents, parental pain medications, and regional anesthesia, each with their own set of potential complications and risk of iatrogenic harm. These risks apply to all women having the procedure, however for nulliparous women before 41 weeks of gestation with an unfavorable cervix, the main risk is cesarean birth after unsuccessful labor induction with the potential for maternal and neonatal morbidity and increased healthcare costs. When cesarean occurs, subsequent births are likely to be via cesarean as well. Elective labor induction before 41 weeks is inconsistent with quality perinatal care, and performance of this unnecessary procedure should be minimized. Convenience as the reason for labor induction is contrary to a culture focused on patient safety. A review of current evidence, followed by changes in practice, is warranted to support the safest care possible during labor and birth. Various strategies to reduce the rate of elective induction in the United States are presented. St John's Mercy Medical Center, St Louis, Missouri. Corresponding Author: Kathleen Rice Simpson, PhD, RNC, FAAN, St John's Mercy Medical Center, 7140 Pershing Ave, St Louis, MO 63130 (firstname.lastname@example.org). Submitted for publication: September 3, 2009 Accepted for publication: October 19, 2009 © 2010 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.