Skip Navigation LinksHome > July/August 2014 - Volume 20 - Issue 4 > Partnering to Create a More Livable City: The Livable St Lo...
Journal of Public Health Management & Practice:
doi: 10.1097/PHH.0b013e31829bfc3a
Original Articles

Partnering to Create a More Livable City: The Livable St Louis Network

Harris, Jenine K. PhD; Roche, Jason MPH; Estlund, Amy K. MPH; Mense, Cindy MS, RD; Baker, Elizabeth A. PhD, MPH

Collapse Box

Abstract

Context: Physical inactivity is a major public health problem. While individual (eg, attitudes, values, beliefs) and social (eg, social support) factors play a role, access to an activity-safe local environment can have a significant influence. Environments that include accessible opportunities for physical activity, a component of livability, require cooperation from many sectors including nonprofit, government, educational, and for profit.

Objective/Design/Setting: This study used a mixed-methods network mapping approach to evaluate a multisector network focused on increasing the livability of St Louis, Missouri.

Participants: Eighteen network members participated in in-depth interviews about their livability partners.

Outcome Measures/Results: The participants identified 86 unique partners in the region, with a majority representing nonprofit and government organizations and fewer from the education and for-profit sectors. Participants trusted 88% of their partners and felt that 83% of partners shared their mission and vision. Trust and shared mission and vision varied across organization types. Specifically, 89% of nonprofit partners were thought to share a mission/vision and 87% were trusted. Participants felt that 87% of government partners shared their mission/vision and 91% were trusted. Participants shared mission/vision with 75% and trusted 75% of educational partners. Finally, 44% of for-profit partners were thought to share mission/vision and 100% were trusted. For-profit partners also had more positive influence than others, while government partners had the highest average negative influence. Finally, while most relationships were mutual, relationships with for-profit partners were mostly one-directional, with for-profit partners sending resources to other network members.

Conclusion: Livability efforts in St Louis might benefit from recruiting additional for-profit partners that provide the network with new perspectives and needed resources, and from cultivating positive partnerships with government organizations that can assist with local policy development and enforcement.

© 2014 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.

Login

Article Tools

Share

Article Level Metrics

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.