Skip Navigation LinksHome > July/August 2013 - Volume 19 - Issue 4 > Outcome Evaluation of a State Comprehensive Cancer Control P...
Journal of Public Health Management & Practice:
doi: 10.1097/PHH.0b013e31825d208c
Original Articles

Outcome Evaluation of a State Comprehensive Cancer Control Plan: Laying the Foundation

Alberg, Anthony J. PhD, MPH; Cartmell, Kathleen B. MPH; Sterba, Katherine R. PhD, MPH; Bolick, Susan MSPH; Daguise, Virginie G. PhD, MSPH; Hébert, James R. ScD, MSPH

Collapse Box


Context: Rigorous outcome evaluation is essential to monitor progress toward achieving goals and objectives in comprehensive cancer control plans (CCCPs).

Objective: This report describes a systematic approach for an initial outcome evaluation of a CCCP.

Design: Using the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention evaluation framework, the evaluation focused on (1) organizing cancer plan objectives by anatomic site and risk factors, (2) rating each according to clarity and data availability, (3) the subsequent evaluation of clearly stated objectives with available outcome data, and (4) mapping allocation of implementation grants for local cancer control back to the CCCP objectives.

Setting: South Carolina.

Main Outcome Measures: Evaluation outcomes included (1) a detailed account of CCCP objectives by topic area, (2) a systematic rating of level of clarity and availability of data to measure CCCP objectives, (3) a systematic assessment of attainment of measurable objectives, and (4) a summary of how cancer control grant funds were allocated and mapped to CCCP objectives.

Results: A system was developed to evaluate the extent to which cancer plan objectives were measurable as written with data available for monitoring. Twenty-one of 64 objectives (33%) in the South Carolina's CCCP were measurable as written with data available. Of the 21 clear and measurable objectives, 38% were not met, 38% were partially met, and 24% were met. Grant allocations were summarized across CCCP chapters, revealing that prevention and early detection were the most heavily funded CCCP areas.

Conclusions: This evaluation highlights a practical, rigorous approach for generating evidence required to monitor progress, enhance planning efforts, and recommend improvements to a CCCP.

Copyright © 2013 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.



Article Tools


Article Level Metrics

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.