Skip Navigation LinksHome > September/October 2012 - Volume 18 - Issue 5 > Where Is Obesity Prevention on the Map?: Distribution and P...
Journal of Public Health Management & Practice:
doi: 10.1097/PHH.0b013e318221718c
Original Articles

Where Is Obesity Prevention on the Map?: Distribution and Predictors of Local Health Department Prevention Activities in Relation to County-Level Obesity Prevalence in the United States

Stamatakis, Katherine A. PhD, MPH; Leatherdale, Scott T. PhD; Marx, Christine M. MA; Yan, Yan MD, PhD; Colditz, Graham A. MD, DrPH; Brownson, Ross C. PhD

Collapse Box


Context: The system of local health departments (LHDs) in the United States has the potential to advance a locally oriented public health response in obesity control and reduce geographic disparities. However, the extent to which obesity prevention programs correspond to local obesity levels is unknown.

Objective: This study examines the extent to which LHDs across the United States have responded to local levels of obesity by examining the association between jurisdiction-level obesity prevalence and the existence of obesity prevention programs.

Design: Data on LHD organizational characteristics from the Profile Study of Local Health Departments and county-level estimates of obesity from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System were analyzed (n = 2300). Since local public health systems are nested within state infrastructure, multilevel models were used to examine the relationship between county-level obesity prevalence and LHD obesity prevention programming and to assess the impact of state-level clustering.

Setting: Two thousand three hundred local health department jurisdictions defined with respect to county boundaries.

Participants: Practitioners in local health departments who responded to the 2005 Profile Study of Local Health Departments.

Main Outcome Measures: Likelihood of having obesity prevention activities and association with area-level obesity prevalence.

Results: The existence of obesity prevention activities was not associated with the prevalence of obesity in the jurisdiction. A substantial portion of the variance in LHD activities was explained by state-level clustering.

Conclusions: This article identified a gap in the local public health response to the obesity epidemic and underscores the importance of multilevel modeling in examining predictors of LHD performance.

© 2012 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.


Article Level Metrics

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.