Skip Navigation LinksHome > May/June 2012 - Volume 18 - Issue 3 > Identifying Children With Chronic Conditions for Influenza V...
Journal of Public Health Management & Practice:
doi: 10.1097/PHH.0b013e3182176eba
Research Articles

Identifying Children With Chronic Conditions for Influenza Vaccination Using a Statewide Immunization Registry: Initial Experiences of Primary Care Providers

Clark, Sarah J. MPH; Lamarand, Kara MPH; Dombkowski, Kevin J. DrPH

Collapse Box

Abstract

Context: Children with chronic medical conditions are at increased risk of complications from influenza, yet their vaccination rates are low. The Michigan Care Improvement Registry (MCIR), a statewide immunization registry, was expanded in 2006 to include an indicator, based on Medicaid administrative claims, that prompts providers to offer influenza vaccine to high-risk children (ie, those with chronic conditions).

Objective: To assess primary care providers' experiences with the MCIR high-risk indicator.

Design: A cross-sectional, self-administered survey mailed in July 2009.

Setting: State of Michigan.

Participants: A total of 300 family physicians and 300 pediatricians who served as primary care providers for children in Michigan's Medicaid program.

Main Outcome Measures: Provider experiences with the high-risk indicator; suggestions for improvement.

Results: Response rate was 79%. Only 32% of pediatricians and 17% of family physicians recalled seeing the high-risk indicator during the 2008–2009 influenza season. Of those who saw the indicator, 48% rated it as “helpful” or “very helpful” in identifying which children should receive flu vaccine. To improve its usefulness, 77% of respondents wanted the indicator to reflect all children, rather than only those enrolled in Medicaid, and 71% wanted MCIR to generate a list of high-risk children in their practice.

Conclusions: Three years after implementation, the registry-based high-risk indicator is not viewed by most providers. Half of those who saw the indicator found it helpful, and most respondents endorsed enhancements to broaden its scope. Future work should explore whether enhanced capabilities help to facilitate identification of priority cases by providers.

© 2012 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.

Login

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.