You could be reading the full-text of this article now if you...

If you have access to this article through your institution,
you can view this article in

An Evaluation of the National Public Health Leadership Institute1991-2006: Part I. Developing Individual Leaders

Umble, Karl E. PhD, MPH; Baker, Edward L. MD, MPH; Woltring, Carol MPH

Journal of Public Health Management & Practice:
doi: 10.1097/PHH.0b013e3181f1e3dc
Original Article
Abstract

Context: Public health leadership development programs are widely employed to strengthen leaders and leadership networks and ultimately agencies and systems. The year-long National Public Health Leadership Institute's (PHLI) goals are to develop the capacity of individual leaders and networks of leaders so that both can lead improvement in public health systems, infrastructure, and population health.

Objective: To evaluate the impact of PHLI on individual graduates using data collected from the first 15 cohorts.

Participants: Between 1992 and 2006, PHLI graduated 806 senior leaders from governmental agencies, academia, health care, associations, nonprofit organizations, foundations, and other organizations. Of 646 graduates located, 393 (61%) responded to a survey, for an overall response rate of 49% (393/806).

Intervention: PHLI has included retreats; readings, conference calls, and webinars; assessments, feedback, and coaching; and action learning projects, in which graduates apply concepts to a work challenge aided by peers and a coach.

Methods: A survey of all graduates and interviews of 34 graduates and one other key informant.

Results: PHLI improved graduates' understanding, skills, and self-awareness, strengthened many graduates' connections to a network of leaders, and significantly increased graduates' voluntary leadership activities at local, state, and national levels (P < .001). Deeper and wider network connections shaped graduates' sense of “belonging” to the national cadre of public health leaders, provided access to supportive peers and ideas, and bolstered confidence and interest in taking on leadership work. Nearly all graduates remained in public health. Some partially attributed to PHLI their promotions into more senior positions.

Conclusion: Leadership development programs can strengthen and sustain their impact by cultivating sustained “communities of practice” that provide ongoing support for skill development and innovative practice. Sponsors can fruitfully view leadership development as a long-term investment in individuals and networks within organizations or fields of practice.

In Brief

This study aims to evaluate the impact of The National Public Health Leadership Institute on individual graduates using data collected from the first 15 cohorts.

Author Information

North Carolina Institute for Public Health, UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill (Drs Umble and Baker); Center for Health Leadership & Practice, Public Health Institute, Oakland, California (Ms Woltring).

Correspondence: Karl E. Umble, PhD, MPH, Campus Box 8165 North Carolina Institute for Public Health, UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 (umble@email.unc.edu).

The authors thank Alison Gunn, MPH; Susan Haws, MPH; Sandra Diehl, MPH; Aiko Hattori, MPH; and Margot Mahannah, MPH, for assistance in the design and conduct of this evaluation. The authors thank Steve Frederick, MPA, of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention for assistance and support in organizing the National Public Health Leadership Institute; David Steffen and Donna Dinkin for leading the program and providing comments on instruments for this study; Steve Orton, Steve Hicks, and Margaret Holt for comments on earlier drafts of this manuscript. The National Public Health Leadership Institute is sponsored by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

© 2011 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.