Skip Navigation LinksHome > February 2012 - Volume 54 - Issue 2 > MicroRNA Profiling Identifies miR-29 as a Regulator of Disea...
Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology & Nutrition:
doi: 10.1097/MPG.0b013e318244148b
Rapid Communication

MicroRNA Profiling Identifies miR-29 as a Regulator of Disease-associated Pathways in Experimental Biliary Atresia

Hand, Nicholas J.; Horner, Amber M.; Master, Zankhana R.; Boateng, LaTasha A.; LeGuen, Claire; Uvaydova, Marina; Friedman, Joshua R.

Free Access
Supplemental Author Material
Article Outline
Collapse Box

Author Information

Department of Pediatrics, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia Research Institute, ARC 902G, 3615 Civic Center Blvd, Philadelphia, PA.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Joshua R. Friedman, Department of Pediatrics, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia Research Institute, ARC 902G, 3615 Civic Center Blvd, Philadelphia, PA 19104-4318 (e-mail: friedmanjo@email.chop.edu).

Supplemental digital content is available for this article. Direct URL citations appear in the printed text and are provided in the HTML and PDF versions of this article on the journal's Website (www.jpgn.org).

Received 3 November, 2011

Accepted 28 November, 2011

The present study received support from grant NIH R01DK079881 (J.R.F.), the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine Center for Digestive and Liver Diseases (NIH 5P30DK050306), the American Liver Foundation, and the Fred and Suzanne Biesecker Pediatric Liver Center.

The authors report no conflicts of interest.

Collapse Box

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Biliary atresia (BA) is a pediatric liver disease of unknown underlying etiology, in which fibroinflammatory destruction of the extrahepatic biliary system leads to obstructive cholestasis. MicroRNAs are a class of short (18–23 nucleotide), noncoding RNA molecules, which act as negative regulators of target mRNA stability and translation. The importance of these molecules in normal and diseased liver has been demonstrated, but their potential role in the pathogenesis of BA has not been addressed. We have profiled changes in liver microRNA levels in an established mouse model of the disease, identified significantly altered transcripts, and defined the spatial expression patterns of selected microRNAs. Two of these, miR-29a/29b1, are upregulated in experimental BA. Using antisense oligonucleotide-mediated inhibition in mice, we have delineated the full set of hepatic genes regulated by miR-29 and identified 2 mRNA targets of potential pathological relevance in experimental BA, Igf1 and Il1RAP. We have used reporter assays to confirm that Igf1 and Il1RAP are direct targets of miR-29.

Biliary atresia (BA) is a fibroinflammatory liver disease of infants in which a primary insult of unknown etiology leads to progressive T-cell-mediated destruction of the extrahepatic biliary system (1–4). Loss of the large bile ducts that drain the liver results in severe, life-threatening cholestasis, and patients present with hyperbilirubinemia and acholic stools, typically by 8 weeks of age. The only intervention available to restore bile flow from the native liver is the Kasai portoenterostomy, which is successful in <80% of cases. Of the patients with a successful short-term outcome from the Kasai procedure, 50% will ultimately require liver transplant for chronic complications. BA is the leading indicator for pediatric liver transplantation worldwide, accounting for 40% to 50% of pediatric liver transplants (5).

The Rhesus rotavirus (RRV)-BALB/c model of BA is an excellent model of the clinical disease (6). As in the human disease, there is a defined window of incidence restricted to the early neonatal period; mice infected with RRV within the first day of life progress rapidly from occlusion and destruction of the extrahepatic ducts to cholestasis and death in approximately 2 weeks. As in the clinical disease, pathogenesis is T-cell mediated: interferon-γ (Ifng) mutant mice, which do not mount a TH1 response, are refractory to the RRV model, and conversely, inflammation of the extrahepatic ducts can be induced in naïve mice by transplantation of T cells isolated from RRV-infected mice (7,8). Previous studies of gene expression in both clinical and experimental BA have demonstrated that the parallels between the mouse model and the human disease extend to the molecular level and have been informative in guiding experimental design aimed at uncovering potential therapeutic interventions (9,10).

Here we explore the potential pathogenic role of the small, noncoding, regulatory RNA molecules known as microRNAs (miRNAs), using the RRV-BALB/c model. We identify specific, significant alterations in the liver miRNA transcriptome during the progression of the disease model. Our results reveal dynamic changes in both spatial and temporal miRNA abundance, some of which correlate with alterations in cell population caused by infiltration, whereas others exhibit widespread expression changes throughout the lobule, reflecting altered cellular states. Among the latter group, we have focused on miR-29a (cotranscribed with the related miRNA, miR-29b1), which is significantly upregulated in both infiltrating and parenchymal cells following RRV infection. We present the first in vivo identification of mRNA targets of miR-29 regulation, and directly link the overexpression of miR-29 to the downregulation of 2 mRNA targets of potential relevance to BA pathogenesis.

Back to Top | Article Outline

METHODS

RRV Model of BA

The animals used in the present study were humanely housed, in accordance with state and federal guidelines under the supervision of the institutional animal care and use committee at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia. Mice were fed a standard rodent chow diet and water ad libitum. Neonatal BALB/c pups were injected intraperitoneally either with 1 × 106 fluorescence-forming units of RRV, or with saline, within the first day of life, as described previously (9).

Back to Top | Article Outline
miRNA Expression Profiling

For the miRNA microarray experiment, RRV and saline-injected animals were euthanized at 3, 8, and 14 days postinfection (dpi) (n = 5 per treatment, per time point), and total RNA was purified from liver using the mirVana miRNA Isolation Kit (Ambion, Austin, TX) according to the manufacturer's instructions. A pooled common control was assembled from an equal RNA mass from each of the samples, and samples and control were separately dye labeled and hybridized to a miRCURY version 9.0 miRNA microarray (Exiqon, Woburn, MA) at the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine microarray core facility. Sample hybridization intensities were scored relative to the common control, and raw intensity data were normalized and analyzed using the SAM add-in (11) for Microsoft Excel. miRNAs exhibiting a fold-change of >10% up or down, at a false discovery rate (FDR) of 5%, were chosen for further study. The microarray data have been deposited at the National Center for Biotechnology Information Gene Expression Omnibus repository under the accession number GSE33418.

To validate the results of the microarray, we performed real-time quantitative polymerase chaim reaction (PCR) Taqman assays (Applied Biosystems, Carlsbad, CA) for candidate miRNAs.

Back to Top | Article Outline
Characterization of miRNA Spatial Expression

The spatial expression of miRNAs was characterized by in situ hybridization on frozen liver sections using 3′-, or 5′- and 3′-double digoxygenin-labeled antisense locked nucleic acid probes (Exiqon) (12). To ensure detection of miRNA with low expression, a tyramide signal amplification step was incorporated.

Back to Top | Article Outline
Bioinformatic Analysis

Using the Partek software suite, we intersected previously published RRV model gene expression data (9,10) with our RRV miRNA microarray data and used the predictions from the Targetscan 5.1 algorithm to generate candidate miRNA target pairs.

Back to Top | Article Outline
Gene Expression Microarray Analysis of miR-29 mRNA Targets

Adult BALB/c female mice were injected intraperitoneally with a single dose at 20 mg/kg of antisense oligonucleotide (ASO) against either miR-29a (5′-TAACCGATTTCAGATGGTGCTA-3′) or a scrambled sequence (5′-TCATTGGCATGTACCATGCAGCT-3′). ASOs contained 2′-O-methoxyethyl (2′-MOE), 2′-fluoro (2′-F) 2′-α-F units with a phosphorothioate backbone (Regulus Therapeutics Inc, San Diego, CA). Six days following the injection, liver was isolated, total RNA was prepared as described above, and the RNA was amplified and biotinylated using the MessageAmp Premier kit (Ambion). Samples (n = 4, each experimental and control) were hybridized to Affymetrix GeneChip Mouse Genome 430 2.0 Arrays in the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia's nucleic acids core facility and analyzed with the assistance of the Penn Bioinformatics core. Probe intensities were normalized using the GeneChip Robust Multiarray Averaging (GCRMA) method (13), and the significance of the log2-transformed, GCRMA-normalized signal intensities was determined using significance analysis of microarray (SAM) (11). The microarray data have been deposited at the National Center for Biotechnology Information Gene Expression Omnibus repository under accession number GPL14829. Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) was performed using the DAVID package (14–16).

Back to Top | Article Outline
Identification of Direct Targets of miR-29a

DNA from the 3′ untranslated region (UTR) of mouse Igf1 and Il1RAP was amplified by nested PCR from C57B/6 genomic DNA, and cloned into pMiRCheck2, a modified derivative of pSiCheck2 (Promega, Madison, WI), in which the SV40 promoter/enhancer driving Renilla luciferase has been replaced by the weaker phosphoglycerate kinase promoter from pL451 (17). Sequences of the oligonucleotide primers used and pMiRCheck2 are listed in online-only Supplemental Table 4 (available at http://links.lww.com/MPG/A84). In the case of miR-29a overexpression, 3 × 104 NIH3T3 cells were seeded into 24-well plates with 900 ng of expression plasmid and 100 ng of dual luciferase reporter plasmid per well, using 3 μL of FugeneHD (Roche Diagnostics, West Sussex, UK). For the ASO assays, 2 μL of Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) was used to cotransfect 200 ng of reporter plasmid with ASO (Regulus Therapeutics) at 20 nmol/L in 24-well format using the same seeding density. After 16 hours, the cells were rinsed once with 1× phosphate buffered saline, and media was replaced with fresh media. After 24 hours of additional outgrowth, the cells were rinsed once with 1× phosphate buffered saline, lysed in 150 μL of 1× Passive Lysis Buffer (Promega), and firefly and Renilla luciferase activities were measured from a 10-μL aliquot, on a GloMax Multi luminometer (Promega) using Stop and Glo reagents (Promega), according to the manufacturer's instructions.

Relative light units were calculated as the ratio of Renilla to firefly luciferase activity, and the reporters were normalized between the control expression plasmids or ASOs to correct for nonspecific effects of the differences between the experimental UTRs, and the empty pMiRCheck2. Values from the empty pMirCheck2 samples for a given control treatment were used to correct for nonspecific effects of the treatment on the normalizer.

Back to Top | Article Outline

RESULTS

MiRNAs Are Differentially Expressed With Time and Treatment in Experimental BA

We isolated RNA from livers of RRV or saline-injected BALB/c neonatal mouse pups at 3, 8, and 14 dpi, and profiled the miRNA transcriptome by hybridization microarray. Principal component analysis illustrates that at all 3 time points, the RRV-infected samples are clearly separated from their control counterparts, and become not only more distinct from the control group but also more divergent within the infected group with time, reflecting the variable nature of disease progression (Fig. 1A). In contrast, the control samples cluster together at all 3 time points.

Figure 1
Figure 1
Image Tools

We used SAM to identify miRNAs whose levels changed significantly with treatment, time, or both (Fig. 1B and online-only Supplemental Table 1, available at http://links.lww.com/MPG/A81). Because more abundant transcripts in parenchymal cells may mask changes in miRNA levels in subpopulations of cells within the liver, we choose inclusive criteria for further study: miRNA whose abundance changed by ±10% relative to the corresponding controls, with P < 0.05 after correction for multiple testing. We validated the results of the hybridization microarray by confirming changes in the abundance of selected miRNAs using individual Taqman assays (Fig. 1C).

Back to Top | Article Outline
Spatial Changes in miRNA Expression in Experimental BA

Increased levels of miRNAs in infected livers may reflect induction of higher transcription in response to infection or cholestasis, a shift in cell population caused by increased numbers of infiltrating cells, or a combination of both factors. To explore the source of the miRNAs most significantly increased in RRV samples, we performed in situ hybridization to determine their expression patterns in infected and control liver sections throughout infection. Consistent with previously published work (18), we observed strong miR-223 expression in infiltrating mononuclear cells (Fig. 2A, arrows and inset). These are likely to be granulocytes, in light of their morphology and the specific expression of miR-223 in this cell type (12,19). In contrast, miR-21 and miR-29a levels are elevated in both hepatocytes and cholangiocytes, with miR-29 also present in rare infiltrating mononuclear cells (Fig. 2B, C). The pattern of increased expression is not uniform throughout sections, with a more apparent increase in surrounding portal tracts in the case of both miR-21 and miR-29a, suggesting an underlying local effect that may originate with either the periportal mesenchyme or the inflammatory infiltrate.

Figure 2
Figure 2
Image Tools
Back to Top | Article Outline
Endothelial miRNA Levels Decrease in Response to RRV

Hybridization array data indicated that miR-126 is present at significantly lower levels at all 3 time points in RRV-infected animals (Supplemental Table 1, http://links.lww.com/MPG/A81). In situ hybridization indicates that miR-126 is strongly expressed in vascular and sinusoidal endothelial cells relative to the rest of the tissue in control animals, but that the levels in infected animals are decreased (Fig. 2D).

Back to Top | Article Outline
Inhibition of miR-29a In Vivo Identifies Liver-expressed mRNA Targets

Based on our array data, 2 miRNAs from a single transcript, miR-29b1 and miR-29a, were predicted to have liver expression that was both greatly abundant and significantly induced in RRV-infected animals at 8 and 14 dpi. Because miR-29 has previously been implicated in both fibrosis and liver disease (20–23), we sought to delineate the full set of hepatic miR-29 target genes by treating adult BALB/c mice with ASO against either miR-29a or a control scrambled sequence. We measured body and liver masses 6 days after injection, and performed serological analysis for a panel of liver markers (alanine transaminase, aspartate transaminase, γ-glutamyl transpeptidase, direct bilirubin, albumin, cholesterol) and measured fasting blood glucose. The ASO29a mice had significant decreases in both liver mass (control 0.94 ± 0.02 g; anti-29a 0.83 ± 0.03 g, P < 0.02) and serum cholesterol (control 53.8 ± 1.5 mg/dL, anti-29a 43.8 ± 2.4 mg/dL, P < 0.02) relative to animals injected with control ASO. There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in any of the other metrics.

We isolated total liver RNA from antisense-injected animals and performed gene expression microarray analysis. Using SAM (24), we identified 104 transcripts upregulated by ≥1.5-fold, and 70 similarly downregulated transcripts (at a false discovery of <10%) (online-only Supplemental Table 2, available at http://links.lww.com/MPG/A82). We validated the microarray data by quantitative PCR (Fig. 3). Dnmt3a and Dnmt3b have previously been shown to be targets of miR-29a (25); the upregulation of both these genes (Fig. 3) confirms that the ASO-based approach was able to repress miR-29a targets. Consistent with recently published results implicating miR-29 in the regulation of fibrosis (20–22), there is an overrepresentation of collagen genes among the upregulated transcripts. Pathways analysis using the DAVID functional classification tool (14–16) indicates significant enrichment of collagen genes (33.7-fold enrichment, p < 9.6 × 10−12) and extracellular matrix (integrin) signaling pathway members (20.6-fold enrichment, p < 4.4 × 10−17), including laminin, elastin, fibrillin, matrix metalloproteases, Sparc, and ADAM family genes. Pathways analysis on the downregulated transcripts indicates overrepresentation of xenobiotic and P-450 pathway components, largely due to effects on multiple transcripts of glutathione-S-transferase family members.

Figure 3
Figure 3
Image Tools

GSEA indicates significant enrichment of the predicted miR-29a/b/c gene set (normalized enrichment score [NES] 1.54; P < 0.001; FDR 0.35) and focal adhesion signaling (NES 1.45; P < 0.001; FDR 0.40) gene sets. In addition, gene sets representing Myc- and p53-targets were enriched (Myc NES 1.52, P < 0.001, FDR 0.34; p53 NES 1.59, P < 0.001, FDR 0.41). Both Myc and p53 regulate miR-29 (26,27); these results suggest that there is a feedback relation in which miR-29 represses p53 and Myc-related pathways. The GSEA results are summarized in online-only Supplemental Table 3 (available at http://links.lww.com/MPG/A83).

We examined the list of deregulated genes to identify candidates of potential importance in BA pathogenesis. We focused on 2 genes: Igf1, previously shown to be important for cholangiocyte survival, and Il1RAP, a modulator of interleukin (IL)-1 signaling in the liver (28,29), both of which contained putative miR-29 binding sites in their 3′ UTRs. We first confirmed that both genes are upregulated in experimental BA (Fig. 3).

Back to Top | Article Outline
Igf1 and Il1RAP Are Direct Targets of miR-29

To test whether Igf1 and Il1RAP are direct targets of miR-29 regulation, we cloned the 3′ UTRs of each gene into a reporter plasmid (pMirCheck2) and performed dual luciferase assays in NIH3T3 cells, while overexpressing miR-29a (Fig. 4A). When miR-29a was overexpressed, the reporters containing the Igf1 and Il1RAP 3′ UTRs were significantly downregulated relative to the empty reporter (Igf1 1.41-fold, P < 0.002; Il1RAP 1.36-fold, P < 0.0002). Conversely, when the reporters were cotransfected with an ASO directed against miR-29a, the normalized Renilla luciferase activity was increased relative to control vector (Igf1 1.81-fold, P < 0.04; Il1RAP 2.49-fold, P < 0.02) (Fig. 4B). Taken together, these data strongly suggest direct regulation of both genes by the miR-29 family.

Figure 4
Figure 4
Image Tools

We have measured the expression of Igf1 and Il1RAP in experimental BA and found that Igf1 expression is significantly decreased at 8 and 12 dpi (5.4- and 2.8-fold, respectively), and Il1RAP is significantly decreased 1.9-fold at 12 dpi (Fig. 4C). These results indicate that the changes in miR-29 expression observed in the BA model are likely to be reflected in multiple downstream pathways.

Back to Top | Article Outline

DISCUSSION

We have described for the first time the changes in the hepatic miRNA transcriptome in the experimental model of BA. Changes in the abundance of miRNAs early in disease progression reflect expected changes in the liver following viral infection: miRNAs in clusters known to be associated with inflammation, cancer, cell proliferation, and apoptosis (28–32) (miR-15a, miR-106a, miR-17, miR-93), and monocyte miRNAs (33) (miR-223, miR-142–3p, which are abundant in granulocytes and T cells, respectively) are increased in abundance. In contrast, known epithelial cell miRNAs (34,35) (miR-192, -194, -215) and previously described liver-expressed miRNAs (12,36–38) (miR-30a, miR-30b, miR-29a) are decreased in relative abundance. A similar pattern persists in later time points with increased abundance of miRNAs associated with cell proliferation (39,40) (miR-21), and immunity (31) (miR-16, miR-21, miR-142–5p, miR-15b) relative to healthy controls and decreased levels of epithelial cell miRNAs. The expression of miR-21, which is strongly induced, likely reflects its importance in cellular growth and its known expression in both immune cells and cholangiocytes (39,41). We have found decreased levels in miR-126, a known endothelial miRNA (42,43). Although endothelial cells are not typically viewed as central to BA pathology, previous studies have identified gene expression changes in endothelial cells in BA clinical samples. Decreased miRNA levels may result from loss of miRNA because of cell death, to skewing of the normalized miRNA levels because of the shift in the cellular population, to the recently described phenomenon of stress-related export of miRNAs (44), or to a combination of these processes.

In addition to these changes, we observed increases of members of the miR-29 family, miR-29a and miR-29b1. Of the 2, miR-29a is both more abundant and more strongly induced, and because the miRNAs are cotranscribed and are likely to have almost complete overlap of target genes, we have used miR-29a as a surrogate for studying both.

Using in situ hybridization, we have localized the expression of miR-29a in control and infected liver sections and shown that although the miRNA is widely expressed throughout the lobule, in infected livers, there is both an overall increase in the level of the miRNA and a greater increase in periportal region. Coincident with the increase in miR-29 levels is a drop in the levels of a known miR-29 direct target, Dnmt3a. The reciprocal relation between miR-29 and methyl transferase gene expression in experimental BA is remarkable given the recent observation that DNA hypomethylation leads to bile defects in a zebrafish model and correlates with clinical BA (45). To explore the potential role of miR-29 in BA pathogenesis, we first delineated the hepatic targets of miR-29 in vivo by ASO-mediated inhibition of miR-29a in healthy adult mice. Using the list thus obtained, we have identified 2 direct targets of miR-29, Igf1 and Il1RAP, with roles in cholangiocyte survival and the modulation of inflammation, respectively. This represents the first genomewide detection of miR-29a targets in vivo.

Consistent with previous in silico predictions and reporter assays, the genes whose expression is increased when the repressive effect of miR-29 is blocked included multiple collagen and extracellular matrix genes, as well as the DNA methyl transferase genes Dnmt3a and Dnmt3b(22,25,46–48). Although miR-29a has been studied in stellate cells, our results indicate that miR-29a is active in hepatocytes; the functions of miR-29a in stellate cells versus hepatocytes will require selective inhibition of the miRNA in a single cell type. Overall, these results provide the first in vivo support for miR-29a function in hepatic fibrosis.

Among the genes upregulated by ASO inhibition of miR-29, we have focused on 2, Igf1 and Il1RAP, and used reporter assays to demonstrate that they are directly regulated by miR-29. High levels of Igf1 have been shown to be associated with cholangiocyte survival in clinical primary biliary cirrhosis samples (49). In experimental BA, increased expression of miR-29, which downregulates Igf1, would be predicted to increase the likelihood of cholangiocyte cell death, and may contribute to the cholangiopathy in children with BA (50).

Il1RAP is involved in IL-1 signaling through its receptor, IL-1RA, and is believed to promote IL-1 signaling (an alternatively spliced gene product, sIl1RAP, acts as a secreted modulatory sink for IL-1) (51,52). The regulation of Il1RAP expression by sites within its 3′ UTR has been described (53). Here we link this regulation in a disease model to overexpression of a specific miRNA, miR-29. In this context, miR-29 overexpression may be an adaptive regulatory mechanism to temper the inflammatory response by downregulating signaling through the IL-1 receptor.

One limitation of our approach to detecting miR-29 targets was the use of adult mice for the in vivo miR-29 inhibition because there may be target genes expressed specifically in juvenile animals. Furthermore, confirmation of a functional role for miR-29a in BA will require successful inhibition of the miRNA in the context of the mouse model. To address these limitations, we performed antisense intraperitoneal injections in RRV-infected and control pups. We used a range of doses, dosing schedules, and oligonucleotide chemistries (cholesterol-tagged locked nucleic acid, 2′-MOE, or 2′-MOE-α-F; all with phosphothiorylated backbones). Despite this, we were unsuccessful in inhibiting miR-29, as measured by upregulation of Dnmt3a/b or any other miR-29a target gene identified in the adult mice. This precluded any functional analysis of miR-29a in the RRV model by antisense inhibition. The failure of the ASO to function in the mouse pups may be caused by a variety of factors, including variable bioavailability via the intraperitoneal route, decreased liver absorption of the ASO, or rapid growth of liver cells at this age. To circumvent this experimental challenge, we are developing genetic tools to conditionally overexpress or inhibit selected miRNAs in a manner that does not depend on oligonucleotide delivery. Use of this approach will enable us to investigate the role of miR-29 in liver development, growth, function, and disease models, including BA. Finally, in collaboration with the Childhood Liver Disease Research and Education Network, we will test our findings in BA and other cholestatic diseases of infancy using clinical specimens.

Back to Top | Article Outline
Acknowledgments

The authors thank all of the members of the Friedman laboratory, the Division of Gastroenterology and Nutrition at CHOP, and the Fred and Suzanne Biesecker Pediatric Liver Center for support. We thank H. Fred Clark for assistance with the Rhesus rotavirus.

Back to Top | Article Outline

REFERENCES

1. Bezerra JA. Potential etiologies of biliary atresia. Pediatr Transplant 2005; 9:646–651.

2. Hartley JL, Davenport M, Kelly DA. Biliary atresia. Lancet 2009; 374:1704–1713.

3. Schreiber RA, Kleinman RE. Biliary atresia. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2002; 35 (suppl 1):S11–S16.

4. Mieli-Vergani G, Vergani D. Biliary atresia. Semin Immunopathol 2009; 31:371–381.

5. Sokol RJ, Shepherd RW, Superina R, et al. Screening and outcomes in biliary atresia: summary of a National Institutes of Health workshop. Hepatology 2007; 46:566–581.

6. Riepenhoff-Talty M, Schaekel K, Clark HF, et al. Group A rotaviruses produce extrahepatic biliary obstruction in orally inoculated newborn mice. Pediatr Res 1993; 33:394–399.

7. Shivakumar P, Campbell KM, Sabla GE, et al. Obstruction of extrahepatic bile ducts by lymphocytes is regulated by IFN-gamma in experimental biliary atresia. J Clin Invest 2004; 114:322–329.

8. Shivakumar P, Sabla G, Mohanty S, et al. Effector role of neonatal hepatic CD8+ lymphocytes in epithelial injury and autoimmunity in experimental biliary atresia. Gastroenterology 2007; 133:268–277.

9. Carvalho E, Liu C, Shivakumar P, et al. Analysis of the biliary transcriptome in experimental biliary atresia. Gastroenterology 2005; 129:713–717.

10. Leonhardt J, Stanulla M, von Wasielewski R, et al. Gene expression profile of the infective murine model for biliary atresia. Pediatr Surg Int 2006; 22:84–89.

11. Tusher VG, Tibshirani R, Chu G. Significance analysis of microarrays applied to the ionizing radiation response. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2001; 98:5116–5121.

12. Hand NJ, Master ZR, Eauclaire SF, et al. The microRNA-30 family is required for vertebrate hepatobiliary development. Gastroenterology 2009; 136:1081–1090.

13. Wu Z, Irizarry R, Gentleman R, et al. A model-based background adjustment for oligonucleotide expression arrays. J Am Stat Assoc 2004;99:909–17.

14. Chivukula RR, Mendell JT. Circular reasoning: microRNAs and cell-cycle control. Trends Biochem Sci 2008; 33:474–481.

15. Huang da W, Sherman BT, Lempicki RA. Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nat Protoc 2009; 4:44–57.

16. Huang da W, Sherman BT, Lempicki RA. Bioinformatics enrichment tools: paths toward the comprehensive functional analysis of large gene lists. Nucleic Acids Res 2009; 37:1–13.

17. Liu P, Jenkins NA, Copeland NG. A highly efficient recombineering-based method for generating conditional knockout mutations. Genome Res 2003; 13:476–484.

18. Merkerova M, Vasikova A, Belickova M, et al. MicroRNA expression profiles in umbilical cord blood cell lineages. Stem Cells Dev 2010; 19:17–26.

19. Fazi F, Rosa A, Fatica A, et al. A minicircuitry comprised of microRNA-223 and transcription factors NFI-A and C/EBPalpha regulates human granulopoiesis. Cell 2005; 123:819–831.

20. Bandyopadhyay S, Friedman RC, Marquez RT, et al. Hepatitis C virus infection and hepatic stellate cell activation downregulate miR-29: miR-29 overexpression reduces hepatitis C viral abundance in culture. J Infect Dis 2011; 203:1753–1762.

21. Cushing L, Kuang PP, Qian J, et al. miR-29 is a major regulator of genes associated with pulmonary fibrosis. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 2011; 45:287–294.

22. Roderburg C, Urban GW, Bettermann K, et al. Micro-RNA profiling reveals a role for miR-29 in human and murine liver fibrosis. Hepatology 2011; 53:209–218.

23. Xiong Y, Fang JH, Yun JP, et al. Effects of microRNA-29 on apoptosis, tumorigenicity, and prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology 2010; 51:836–845.

24. Tusher VG, Tibshirani R, Chu G. Significance analysis of microarrays applied to the ionizing radiation response. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2001; 98:5116–5121.

25. Fabbri M, Garzon R, Cimmino A, et al. MicroRNA-29 family reverts aberrant methylation in lung cancer by targeting DNA methyltransferases 3A and 3B. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2007; 104:15805–15810.

26. Boominathan L. The guardians of the genome (p53, TA-p73, and TA-p63) are regulators of tumor suppressor miRNAs network. Cancer Metastasis Rev 2010; 29:613–639.

27. Mott JL, Kurita S, Cazanave SC, et al. Transcriptional suppression of mir-29b-1/mir-29a promoter by c-Myc, hedgehog, and NF-kappaB. J Cell Biochem 2010; 110:1155–1164.

28. Onori P, Alvaro D, Floreani AR, et al. Activation of the IGF1 system characterizes cholangiocyte survival during progression of primary biliary cirrhosis. J Histochem Cytochem 2007; 55:327–334.

29. Jensen LE, Muzio M, Mantovani A, et al. IL-1 signaling cascade in liver cells and the involvement of a soluble form of the IL-1 receptor accessory protein. J Immunol 2000; 164:5277–5286.

30. Zahm AM, Thayu M, Hand NJ, et al. Circulating microRNA is a biomarker of pediatric Crohn disease. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2011; 53:26–33.

31. Meenhuis A, van Veelen PA, de Looper H, et al. MiR-17/20/93/106 promote hematopoietic cell expansion by targeting sequestosome 1-regulated pathways in mice. Blood 2011;118:916–25.

32. Li G, Luna C, Qiu J, et al. Alterations in microRNA expression in stress-induced cellular senescence. Mech Ageing Dev 2009; 130:731–741.

33. Merkerova M, Belickova M, Bruchova H. Differential expression of microRNAs in hematopoietic cell lineages. Eur J Haematol 2008; 81:304–310.

34. Kim T, Veronese A, Pichiorri F, et al. p53 regulates epithelial-mesenchymal transition through microRNAs targeting ZEB1 and ZEB2. J Exp Med 2011;208:875–83.

35. McKenna LB, Schug J, Vourekas A, et al. MicroRNAs control intestinal epithelial differentiation, architecture, and barrier function. Gastroenterology 2010;139:1654–64.64 e1.

36. Roderburg C, Urban GW, Bettermann K, et al. Micro-RNA profiling reveals a role for miR-29 in human and murine liver fibrosis. Hepatology 2011;53:209–18.

37. Rogler CE, Levoci L, Ader T, et al. MicroRNA-23b cluster microRNAs regulate transforming growth factor-beta/bone morphogenetic protein signaling and liver stem cell differentiation by targeting Smads. Hepatology 2009; 50:575–584.

38. Sekiya Y, Ogawa T, Yoshizato K, et al. Suppression of hepatic stellate cell activation by microRNA-29b. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2011;412:74–9.

39. Song G, Sharma AD, Roll GR, et al. MicroRNAs control hepatocyte proliferation during liver regeneration. Hepatology 2010;51:1735–43.

40. Lou Y, Yang X, Wang F, et al. MicroRNA-21 promotes the cell proliferation, invasion and migration abilities in ovarian epithelial carcinomas through inhibiting the expression of PTEN protein. Int J Mol Med 2010;26:819–27.

41. Meng F, Henson R, Wehbe-Janek H, et al. MicroRNA-21 regulates expression of the PTEN tumor suppressor gene in human hepatocellular cancer. Gastroenterology 2007; 133:647–658.

42. Jorgensen S, Baker A, Moller S, et al. Robust one-day in situ hybridization protocol for detection of microRNAs in paraffin samples using LNA probes. Methods 2010;52:375–81.

43. Harris TA, Yamakuchi M, Ferlito M, et al. MicroRNA-126 regulates endothelial expression of vascular cell adhesion molecule 1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2008; 105:1516–1521.

44. Wang K, Zhang S, Weber J, et al. Export of microRNAs and microRNA-protective protein by mammalian cells. Nucleic Acids Res 2010; 38:7248–7259.

45. Matthews RP, Eauclaire SF, Mugnier M, et al. DNA hypomethylation causes bile duct defects in zebrafish and is a distinguishing feature of infantile biliary atresia. Hepatology 2011; 53:905–914.

46. Kwiecinski M, Noetel A, Elfimova N, et al. Hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) inhibits collagen I and IV synthesis in hepatic stellate cells by miRNA-29 induction. PLoS One 2011; 6:e24568.

47. Sekiya Y, Ogawa T, Yoshizato K, et al. Suppression of hepatic stellate cell activation by microRNA-29b. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2011; 412:74–79.

48. Braconi C, Kogure T, Valeri N, et al. microRNA-29 can regulate expression of the long non-coding RNA gene MEG3 in hepatocellular cancer. Oncogene 2011;30:4750–6.

49. Onori P, Alvaro D, Floreani AR, et al. Activation of the IGF1 system characterizes cholangiocyte survival during progression of primary biliary cirrhosis. J Histochem Cytochem 2007; 55:327–334.

50. Gatto M, Drudi-Metalli V, Torrice A, et al. Insulin-like growth factor-1 isoforms in rat hepatocytes and cholangiocytes and their involvement in protection against cholestatic injury. Lab Invest 2008; 88:986–994.

51. Jensen LE, Whitehead AS. Expression of alternatively spliced interleukin-1 receptor accessory protein mRNAs is differentially regulated during inflammation and apoptosis. Cell Signal 2003; 15:793–802.

52. Jensen LE, Muzio M, Mantovani A, et al. IL-1 signaling cascade in liver cells and the involvement of a soluble form of the IL-1 receptor accessory protein. J Immunol 2000; 164:5277–5286.

53. Jensen LE, Whitehead AS. The 3′ untranslated region of the membrane-bound IL-1R accessory protein mRNA confers tissue-specific destabilization. J Immunol 2004; 173:6248–6258.

Cited By:

This article has been cited 7 time(s).

Clinical Biochemistry
microRNAs in liver disease: From diagnostics to therapeutics
Takahashi, K; Yan, I; Wen, HJ; Patel, T
Clinical Biochemistry, 46(): 946-952.
10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2013.01.025
CrossRef
Diabetes
MicroRNA-7 Regulates the mTOR Pathway and Proliferation in Adult Pancreatic beta-Cells
Wang, Y; Liu, JY; Liu, CY; Naji, A; Stoffers, DA
Diabetes, 62(3): 887-895.
10.2337/db12-0451
CrossRef
Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology
MicroRNAs in liver disease
Szabo, G; Bala, S
Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology, 10(9): 542-552.
10.1038/nrgastro.2013.87
CrossRef
Current Molecular Medicine
MiRNA-29: A microRNA Family with Tumor-Suppressing and Immune-Modulating Properties
Schmitt, MJ; Margue, C; Behrmann, I; Kreis, S
Current Molecular Medicine, 13(4): 572-585.

Bmc Genomics
Dynamic recruitment of microRNAs to their mRNA targets in the regenerating liver
Schug, J; McKenna, LB; Walton, G; Hand, N; Mukherjee, S; Essuman, K; Shi, ZJ; Gao, Y; Markley, K; Nakagawa, M; Kameswaran, V; Vourekas, A; Friedman, JR; Kaestner, KH; Greenbaum, LE
Bmc Genomics, 14(): -.
ARTN 264
CrossRef
Comprehensive Physiology
Apoptosis and Necrosis in the Liver
Guicciardi, ME; Malhi, H; Mott, JL; Gores, GJ
Comprehensive Physiology, 3(2): 977-1010.
10.1002/cphy.c120020
CrossRef
Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences
Etiology of biliary atresia as a developmental anomaly: recent advances
Nakamura, K; Tanoue, A
Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences, 20(5): 459-464.
10.1007/s00534-013-0604-4
CrossRef
Back to Top | Article Outline
Keywords:

biliary atresia; microRNA; inflammation; cholestasis

Supplemental Digital Content

Back to Top | Article Outline

Copyright 2012 by ESPGHAN and NASPGHAN

Login

Article Tools

Images

Share

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.

Connect With Us

 

 

Twitter

twitter.com/JPGNonline

 

Visit JPGN.org on your smartphone. Scan this code (QR reader app required) with your phone and be taken directly to the site.