Enter your Email address:
Wolters Kluwer Health may email you for journal alerts and information, but is committed
to maintaining your privacy and will not share your personal information without
May, Judith*; Chant, Terri*; Vales, Patricia†; Emmerson, Anthony*
*Department of Neonatal Medicine,
St. Mary's Hospital,
Whitworth Park, Manchester;
University Department of Surgery,
Manchester Royal Infirmary,
Oxford Road, Manchester, U.K.
To the Editors:
We are interested to read the letter by Day suggesting that Song's formula was more reliable in children between the ages of 4 months and 13 years compared with Strobel's or Jolley's formulas.
We have reviewed our data for the premature neonate between 28 and 35 weeks gestation and find that Song's formula for calculating esophageal length in our preterm population of infants would result in an estimated esophageal length that was on average 9.75 cm (range 8.6–13 cm). The use of Strobel's formula for calculation of LOS position was, on average, 14.92 (range 13.5–18.3 cm). Comparison with Strobel's formula using the recommended 87% of the LOS calculation with correct probe position on radiograph yields an average re-positioning of 0.88 cm (range 0.3–2.3). In the infants in whom probe repositioning was indicated on radiograph, it was necessary to withdraw the probe slightly, except in two infants when it was passed marginally further down the esophagus. If Song's formula for estimation of esophageal length were used for probe placement, the difference between probe position on radiograph and Song's calculation would be on average 2.9 cm (range 1.10–4.4 cm) and in all cases the probe would be positioned too high in the esophagus.
Therefore, citing the probe based on Song's calculation, particularly in the population of very small preterm infants studied, could potentially result in significant errors in interpretation, since the probe would be around the middle of the esophagus rather than just above the LOS. In view of these comparisons, it was believed that Strobel's formula was the non-invasive method of choice for probe placement in the preterm neonate.
© 2003 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.
Colleague's E-mail is Invalid
Your Name: (optional)
Separate multiple e-mails with a (;).
Thought you might appreciate this item(s) I saw at Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition.
Send a copy to your email
Your message has been successfully sent to your colleague.
Some error has occurred while processing your request. Please try after some time.
An Existing Folder
A New Folder
The item(s) has been successfully added to "".
Login with your LWW Journals username and password.
Username or Email:
Enter and submit the email address you registered with. An email with instructions to reset your password will be sent to that address.
Link to reset your password has been sent to specified email address.
What does "Remember me" mean?
By checking this box, you'll stay logged in until you logout. You'll get easier access to your articles, collections,
media, and all your other content, even if you close your browser or shut down your
To protect your most sensitive data and activities (like changing your password),
we'll ask you to re-enter your password when you access these services.
What if I'm on a computer that I share with others?
If you're using a public computer or you share this computer with others, we recommend
that you uncheck the "Remember me" box.
Save my selection
Article Level Metrics