The patients receiving Lactobacillus GG in the ORS gained, during the first 24 hours, 220 ± 120 g (range, 8830 ± 2620 g to 9050 ± 2630 g). Those receiving only ORS gained, in the same period, 160 ± 200 g (range, 8750 ± 2790 g to 8910 ± 2680 g). Similar data were obtained when subdividing the patients according to cause of diarrhea. Thus, although children receiving Lactobacillus GG in ORS had a better average weight gain, it was not statistically significant.
Duration of Hospital Stay
The duration of hospital stay in hours is reported in Figure 5. Children receiving the ORS containing Lactobacillus GG stayed in the hospital for 78.8 ± 22.2 hours, whereas their counterparts were in the hospital for 96.3 ± 21.4 hours (P = 0.04). When considering the groups according to cause, it is evident that the clearest advantage was seen in the children affected by rotavirus. Hospital stay lasted 76.5 ± 15 hours in Lactobacillus GG–treated patients versus 97.9 ± 16.5 hours in control patients (P = 0.04). Although the mean duration of hospital stay also appeared to be shorter in the Lactobacillus GG–treated patients in the group of children with either an invasive pathogen or diarrhea of unknown origin, these differences were not statistically significant.
The use of lactic acid bacteria to treat human diseases is not a new concept (2,3). In fact, lactobacilli are among the most common bacterial species used to promote health and counteract intestinal infections. Among them, Lactobacillus rhamnosus strain GG (ATCC 53103) is by far the most widely investigated (4). This strain, with a capacity of transiently colonizing the human gastrointestinal tract that has been well established (5), has been shown to have a number of diverse, potentially beneficial, biologic effects and, in several clinical trials, to be effective in the prevention (6,7) and/or treatment of acute diarrheal disease in children (reviewed in [8,9]) and in adults (reviewed in ). However, although the effect of the probiotic is now considered well established in treating acute diarrheal disease due to rotavirus enteritis, the efficacy or inefficacy of this agent in ameliorating bacterial enteritis is not clear. Most clinical trials have been conducted in patients populations overwhelmingly composed of rotavirus-affected children (11–18). Furthermore, in reports in which a portion of the children studied were affected by likely bacterial pathogens (i.e., patients with bloody diarrhea and/or dysentery [19,20]) or in which a subset of patients were found to be affected by bacterial pathogens (18), the efficacy of the probiotic was doubtful. In our series, we confirmed in a large sample the substantial inefficacy of Lactobacillus GG in proven bacterial infectious diarrhea. In fact, in a series of 53 children with invasive pathogens (i.e., diarrhea caused by Salmonella, Shigella, Campylobacter, Yersinia, or Entamoeba), we found no difference in the duration of diarrhea between Lactobacillus GG–treated and placebo-treated groups. However, it is of interest to note that in the subset of patients in whom stools yielded no identifiable pathogens (a total of 99 children), the administration of Lactobacillus GG in the ORS induced a significant reduction of diarrheal duration. Because the Lactobacillus GG was shown to be effective in the patients with rotavirus diarrhea, we may then speculate that the success of the probiotic therapy in the patients with no identifiable pathogen may be explained by its efficacy against a pathogen of unidentified viral origin. Thus, it would appear that this particular strain of lactic acid bacteria is able to prevent and counteract the pathophysiological changes arising in the small bowel as a result of a viral infection but is less effective against those arising as a consequence of an invasive bacterial infection in the large intestine.
We can only speculate on the reason for this. Mack et al. (21) have recently presented evidence that in intestinal epithelial cells in vitro probiotic bacteria can enhance the expression of mRNA for two predominant mucins, MUC2 and MUC3. Such glycoproteins are known to have a protective role versus intestinal infections, and this mechanism may have a role in probiotic-induced protection from viral agents. Mucinase-producing bacteria, on the other hand, would effectively overcome this preventive mechanism.
In our experimental design, Lactobacillus GG was present in the ORS, a previously unreported way of administering the probiotic. We thought this innovative approach could guarantee an early colonization with the bacteria, thereby offering the most effective way of showing its efficacy. Additionally, because the intake of ORS clearly varies with the degree of dehydration, having the probiotic in the ORS would provide a means of delivering doses of the microorganism proportionate to the severity of the dehydration. Most patients did not continue to take appreciable amounts of ORS after the first 24 hours. In fact, on average, only approximately 300 ml in total was taken in after that time in both groups. Thus, intake of Lactobacillus GG can be assumed to have been 3 × 1010 CFU during the first 24 hours (approximately 1.5 × 1010 CFU during the first 4 hours), but only 1010 CFU during the entire course of the diarrheal episode.
Nevertheless, the efficacy of this approach in rotavirus-affected patients was similar to that previously reported in providing higher, more continuous doses 12,13,15,16). A recent report by Rautanen et al. (17) shows that early administration of Lactobacillus GG is effective, and that even a single early dose might be maximally effective, possibly as a result of a lasting colonization.
A result that in our opinion was of great interest is the dramatic reduction of the percentage of patients with a prolonged diarrheal episode. In the control population, more than 10% of the children had diarrhea for more than 7 days, whereas less than 3% of the treated children had such a prolonged course. The risk of having diarrhea for more than a week was found to be reduced almost four times in the Lactobacillus GG–treated group. These data show the capacity of the probiotic in helping prevent a protracted course, one of the most feared events in acute-onset diarrhea in children. Although we do not know the mechanism of prevention, it is tempting to speculate that the improved gut barrier function that Lactobacillus GG has shown in the animal (22), as well as its demonstrated anti-inflammatory effect in patients with food allergy (23) could have been contributing factors.
Finally, it is noteworthy that in our series of patients, mostly in hospitals, the length of hospital stay was markedly and significantly reduced by the use of Lactobacillus GG in ORS. This finding, mainly because of the clear effect on the duration of hospital stay for rotavirus patients, greatly adds to the benefits of this treatment by allowing a marked reduction in hospital costs as well as a diminished risk of hospital spread of rotavirus infection.
In summary, the data we present allow the following major conclusions to be drawn.
1. Lactobacillus GG can be safely administered in the ORS used in the initial rehydration of children with acute diarrhea of different origins.
2. This intervention results in a shorter duration of diarrhea. The effect is more evident in, but not limited to, rotavirus-positive patients.
3. Children who receive Lactobacillus GG have a markedly reduced chance of having diarrhea lasting more than a week than do their control counterparts.
4. Duration of hospital stay is almost 1 day less in patients receiving Lactobacillus GG in ORS.
In conclusion, we think that the current approach calling for use of hypotonic solutions (1) and early refeeding (24,25) in European children could be integrated with the use of Lactobacillus GG in the ORS to optimize the approach to infants and children who have acute-onset diarrhea.
1. Booth I, Cunha Ferreina R, Desjeux J. Recommendations for composition of oral rehydration solutions for the children of Europe. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 1992; 14:113–5.
2. Saavedra JM. Microbes to fight microbes: A not so novel approach to controlling diarrheal disease (editorial and comment). J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 1995; 21:125–9.
3. Lewis SJ, Freedman, AR. Review article: The use of biotherapeutic agents in the prevention and treatment of gastrointestinal disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 1998; 12:807–22.
4. Bengmark S. Ecological control of the gastrointestinal tract: The role of probiotic flora. Gut
5. Goldin BR, Gorbach SL, Saxelin M, Barakat S, Gualtieri L, Salminen S. Survival of Lactobacillus
species (strain GG) in human gastrointestinal tract. Dig Dis Sci 1992; 37:121–8.
6. DuPont HL. Lactobacillus
GG in prevention of traveler's diarrhea: An encouraging first step. J Travel Med 1997; 4:1–2.
7. Hilton E, Kolakowoski P, Singer C, Smith M. Efficacy of Lactobacillus
GG as a diarrheal preventive in travelers. J Travel Med 1997; 4:41–3.
8. Guandalini S. Probiotics in the treatment of diarrheal diseases in children. Gastroenterol Int 1998; 11:87–90.
9. Vanderhoof JA, Young RJ. Use of probiotics in childhood gastrointestinal disorders. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 1998; 27:323–32.
10. Elmer GW, Surawicz CM, McFarland LV. Biotherapeutic agents: A neglected modality for the treatment and prevention of selected intestinal and vaginal infections (review). JAMA 1996; 275:870–6.
11. Guarino A, Canani RB, Spagnuolo MI, Albano F, Di Benedetto L. Oral bacterial therapy reduces the duration of symptoms and of viral excretion in children with mild diarrhea. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 1997; 25:516–9.
12. Isolauri E, Juntunen M, Rautanen T, Sillanaukee P, Koivula T. A human Lactobacillus
casei sp strain GG) promotes recovery from acute diarrhea in children. Pediatrics 1991; 88:90–7.
13. Isolauri E, Kaila M, Mykkanen H, Ling WH, Salminen S. Oral bacteriotherapy for viral gastroenteritis. Dig Dis Sci 1994; 39:2595–600.
14. Kaila M, Isolauri E, Soppi E, Virtanen E, Laine S, Arvilommi H. Enhancement of the circulating antibody secreting cell response in human diarrhea by a human Lactobacillus
strain. Pediatr Res 1992; 32:141–4.
15. Kaila M, Isolauri E, Saxelin M, Arvilommi H, Vesikari T. Viable versus inactivated lactobacillus strain GG in acute rotavirus diarrhoea. Arch Dis Child 1995; 72:51–3.
16. Majamaa H, Isolauri E, Saxelin M, Vesikari T. Lactic acid bacteria in the treatment of acute rotavirus gastroenteritis. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 1995; 20:333–8.
17. Rautanen T, Isolauri E, Salo E, Vesikari T. Management of acute diarrhoea with low osmolarity oral rehydration solutions and Lactobacillus strain GG. Arch Dis Child 1998; 79:157–60.
18. Shornikova AV, Isolauri E, Burkanova L, Lukovnikova S, Vesikari T. A trial in the Karelian Republic of oral rehydration and Lactobacillus
GG for treatment of acute diarrhoea. Acta Paediatr 1997; 86:460–5.
19. Raza S, Graham SM, Allen SJ, Sultana S, Cuevas L, Hart CA. Lactobacillus
GG promotes recovery from acute nonbloody diarrhea in Pakistan. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1995; 14:107–11.
20. Pant AR, Graham SM, Allen SJ, et al. Lactobacillus
GG and acute diarrhoea in young children in the tropics. J Trop Pediatr 1996; 42:162–5.
21. Mack DR, Michail S, Wei S, et al. Probiotics inhibit enteropathogenic E. coli adherence in vitro by inducing intestinal mucin gene expression. Am J Physiol 1999; 276:G941–G950.
22. Isolauri E, Majamaa H, Arvola T, Rantala I, Virtanen E, Arvilommi H. Lactobacillus casei
strain GG reverses increased intestinal permeability induced by cow milk in suckling rats. Gastroenterology 1993; 105:1643–50.
23. Majamaa H, Isolauri E. Probiotics: a novel approach in the management of food allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1997; 99:179–85.
24. Sandhu BK, Isolauri E, Walker-Smith JA, et al. A multicenter study on behalf of the European Society of Paediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition Working Group on Acute Diarrhoea. Early feeding in childhood gastroenteritis. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 1997; 24:522–7.
25. Walker–Smith JA, Sandhu BK, Isolauri E, et al. Guidelines prepared by the ESPGAN Working Group on Acute Diarrhoea. Recommendations for feeding in childhood gastroenteritis. European Society of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 1997; 24:619–20.
This article has been cited
Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition & Metabolic CarePre-, pro- and synbioticsCurrent Opinion in Clinical Nutrition & Metabolic Care
Current Opinion in Critical CarePlace of probioticsCurrent Opinion in Critical Care
Current Opinion in GastroenterologyThe role of probiotics in the treatment of intestinal infections and inflammationCurrent Opinion in Gastroenterology
Current Opinion in GastroenterologyProbiotics in gastroenterologyCurrent Opinion in Gastroenterology
Current Opinion in GastroenterologyProbiotics and prebiotics in gastrointestinal disordersCurrent Opinion in Gastroenterology
Current Opinion in PediatricsProbiotics in pediatric gastrointestinal disordersCurrent Opinion in Pediatrics
Current Opinion in Pulmonary MedicineProbiotics for the prevention of nosocomial pneumonia: current evidence and opinionsCurrent Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine
Journal of Clinical GastroenterologyProbiotics for Children: Use in DiarrheaJournal of Clinical Gastroenterology
Journal of Clinical GastroenterologyRecommendations for Probiotic UseJournal of Clinical Gastroenterology
Journal of Clinical GastroenterologyProbiotics Used in Human StudiesJournal of Clinical Gastroenterology
Journal of Clinical GastroenterologyProbiotics for the Developing WorldJournal of Clinical Gastroenterology
Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and NutritionAre Medications Useful as Adjunctive Therapy for Oral Rehydration Solutions?Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition
Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and NutritionLimitations of Probiotic Therapy in Acute, Severe Dehydrating DiarrheaJournal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition
Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and NutritionWhy Don't We Bud?Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition
Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and NutritionEffect of Feeding Yogurt Versus Milk in Children With Acute Diarrhea and Carbohydrate MalabsorptionJournal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition
Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and NutritionIs Lactobacillus GG Helpful in Children With Crohn’s Disease? Results of a Preliminary, Open-Label StudyJournal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition
The Pediatric Infectious Disease JournalProbiotics Have Clinical, Microbiologic, and Immunologic Efficacy in Acute Infectious DiarrheaThe Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal
The Pediatric Infectious Disease JournalEffect of probiotic Lactobacillus strains in young children hospitalized with acute diarrheaThe Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal
Keywords:© 2000 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.
Children; Diarrhea; Infantile diarrhea; Lactobacillus GG; Probiotics; Rehydration