Objective: The aim of the present study was to assess the primary and secondary resistance of Helicobacter pylori strains to clarithromycin, amoxicillin, furazolidone, tetracycline, and metronidazole, the conventional antibiotics presently used in Brazilian children and adolescents.
Methods: Seventy-seven consecutive H pylori strains, 71 of 77 strains obtained from patients without previous eradication treatment for H pylori infection, and 6 strains from patients in whom previous eradication treatment had failed.
Results: Global rate of resistance was 49.3% (38/77): 40% of strains were resistant to metronidazole, 19.5% to clarithromycin, and 10.4% to amoxicillin. All of the tested H pylori strains were susceptible to furazolidone and tetracycline. Multiple resistance were detected in 18.2% (14/77 patients) of the strains: 6 of 14 (43%) simultaneously resistant to clarithromycin and metronidazole; 5 of 14 (36%) to amoxicillin and metronidazole; 2 of 14 (14%) to amoxicillin, clarithromycin, and metronidazole; and 1 of 14 (7%) to clarithromycin and amoxicillin.
Conclusions: The high resistance rate to metronidazole and clarithromycin observed in clinical H pylori isolates can exclude these antimicrobials in empirical eradication treatment in Brazil. Otherwise, furazolidone and tetracycline presented no resistance. Properly assessing the risks and benefits, these 2 antimicrobials and their derivatives could be used in empirical eradication schedules, both associated with amoxicillin, which showed a low resistance rate despite its wide use in pediatric patients.
*Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition
†Department of Clinical Pathology, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Silvio K. Ogata, Rua Pedro de Toledo, 443 Vila Clementino, São Paulo 04039-031, Brazil (e-mail: email@example.comfirstname.lastname@example.org).
Received 20 March, 2012
Accepted 1 February, 2013
The study was supported by Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo, FAPESP.
The authors report no conflicts of interest.