Institutional members access full text with Ovid®

Share this article on:

Nutrient Accretion in Preterm Infants Fed Formula with Different Protein:Energy Ratios

Fairey, Ann K.; Butte, Nancy F.*; Mehta, Nitesh*; Thotathuchery, Mary*; Schanler, Richard J.*; Heird, William C.*

Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology & Nutrition: July 1997 - Volume 25 - Issue 1 - pp 37-45
Original Articles

Background: Although standard formulas for preterm infants promote intrauterine rates of weight gain, fat deposition in preterm infants fed these formulas has been reported to be considerably higher than that in the fetus. We hypothesized that a preterm infant formula with a higher protein:energy (P:E) ratio would promote accretion rates of fat, fat-free mass, and minerals closer to those of the fetus.

Methods: As part of a larger study to determine whether accretion rates of fat and fat-free mass closer to those of the fetus can be achieved with a higher P:E ratio, we present a descriptive analysis of 72-h nutrient balance studies performed on a subset (n = 15/30) of the infants randomly assigned to be fed formula with a P:E ratio of either 3.2 g/100 kcal or 2.6 g/100 kcal.

Results: Despite the higher intake and net absorption of nitrogen by infants fed the higher P:E formula, there was no statistically significant difference in net nitrogen retention between groups. There also were no statistically significant differences between groups in digestible energy, metabolizable energy, energy expenditure, or energy storage. Thus, partitioning of stored energy as protein and fat did not differ between groups. The retention of calcium, phosphorus, sodium, potassium, copper, and zinc also did not differ between groups, and nitrogen intake did not affect mineral retention.

Conclusions: In this study, formula for preterm infants with a P:E ratio of 3.2 g/100 kcal vs. 2.6 g/100 kcal provided no apparent benefit in terms of the proportion of fat to lean tissue accretion as determined from nutrient balance data.

Southern Mississippi Neonatology, Hattiesburg, Mississippi; and *USDA/ARS Children's Nutrition Research Center, Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, U.S.A.

Received April 23, 1996; revised January 14, 1997; accepted January 29, 1997.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Nancy F. Butte, Children's Nutrition Research Center, 1100 Bates Street, Houston, TX 77030, U.S.A.

© Lippincott-Raven Publishers