Skip Navigation LinksHome > September/October 2012 - Volume 18 - Issue 5 > Abdominal Sacral Hysteropexy: A Pilot Study Comparing Sacra...
Female Pelvic Medicine & Reconstructive Surgery:
doi: 10.1097/SPV.0b013e3182673772
Original Articles

Abdominal Sacral Hysteropexy: A Pilot Study Comparing Sacral Hysteropexy to Sacral Colpopexy With Hysterectomy

Cvach, Kristina MD*; Geoffrion, Roxana MD; Cundiff, Geoffrey W. MD

Collapse Box

Abstract

Objectives: Treatment of pelvic prolapse with uterine conservation using the sacral hysteropexy may be associated with less patient morbidity but has uncertain subjective and objective outcomes. We sought to compare abdominal sacral hysteropexy (ASH) with sacral colpopexy/total abdominal hysterectomy (ASC/TAH).

Methods: This is an ambispective (retrospective/prospective) cohort pilot study comparing ASH to ASC/TAH. The primary outcome was global impression of improvement. Secondary outcomes were based on validated quality-of-life questionnaires and surgical complications.

Results: Eighteen ASHs were compared to 9 ASC/TAHs after a mean follow-up of 19 months. Whereas subjective outcomes did not differ, anterior failure (55%) and subsequent uterine pathology (22%) were higher in the ASH cohort. Graft erosion occurred in 33% of the ASC/TAH group.

Conclusions: The ASH offers advantages and disadvantages that warrant further investigation with a prospective study.

© 2012 by Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Login

Article Tools

Share

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.