Institutional members access full text with Ovid®

Resident Opinions on Vaginal Hysterectomy Training

Antosh, Danielle D. MD; Gutman, Robert E. MD; Iglesia, Cheryl B. MD; Sokol, Andrew I. MD; Park, Amy J. MD

Female Pelvic Medicine & Reconstructive Surgery: November/December 2011 - Volume 17 - Issue 6 - pp 314-317
doi: 10.1097/SPV.0b013e31823a08bf
Original Articles
Journal Club

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to explore resident opinions about vaginal hysterectomy training and to evaluate future practice patterns and impediments to continuing vaginal hysterectomies after graduation.

Methods: An anonymous survey was e-mailed to fourth-year gynecology residents before graduation. The survey assessed opinions on vaginal hysterectomy training and future practice plans.

Results: One hundred eighty-three residents responded from 41 states. Most residents (75%) think vaginal hysterectomy training has been adequate to prepare them for future practice. Residents were more likely to respond that their training was adequate if they had performed more than 20 vaginal hysterectomies and if they had learned morcellation techniques. Only 42% of residents report vaginal route as their preferred route for hysterectomy.

Conclusions: Most residents feel that training in vaginal hysterectomy has been adequate to prepare them for their future practice, although they are more likely to feel prepared if they have performed more than 20 vaginal hysterectomies.

Training in vaginal hysterectomy has been adequate to prepare residents for their future practice, although they are more likely to feel prepared if they have performed more than 20 vaginal hysterectomies.

From the Section of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington Hospital Center; Washington, DC.

Reprints: Danielle D. Antosh, MD, National Center for Advanced Pelvic Surgery, Washington Hospital Center, 110 Irving St NW, Room 5B 63, Washington, DC 20010. E-mail: Danielle.M.Antosh@medstar.net.

No financial support was received for this study.

Presented at the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists Annual Meeting, Las Vegas, NV, November 10, 2010.

The authors declare that they have nothing to disclose.

© 2011 by Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins