Computer-assisted communication is shown to prevent critical omissions (“errors”) in the handoff process.
The aim of the study was to study this effect and related provider satisfaction, using a standardized software.
Fourteen internal medicine house officers staffed 6 days and 1 cross-covering teams were randomized to either the intervention group or control, employing usual handoff, so that handoff information was exchanged only between same-group subjects (daily, for 28 days).
In the intervention group, fewer omissions (among those studied) occurred intravenous access (17 versus 422, P < 0.001), code status (1 versus 158, P < 0.001), diet/nothing per mouth (28 versus 477, P < 0.001), and deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis (17 versus 284, P < 0.001); duration to compose handoff was similar; and physicians perceived less workload adjusted for patient census and provider characteristics (P = 0.004) as well as better handoff quality (P < 0.001) and clarity (P < 0.001).
The intervention was associated with fewer errors and superior provider satisfaction.
Correspondence: Markos G. Kashiouris, MD, MPH, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, 1200 E. Broad Street, Box 980050, Richmond, VA 23298-0050 (e-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org).
The authors disclose no conflict of interest.
Supplemental digital contents are available for this article. Direct URL citations appear in the printed text and are provided in the HTML and PDF versions of this article on the journal’s Web site (www.journalpatientsafety.com).
Copyright © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved