Skip Navigation LinksHome > June 2014 - Volume 10 - Issue 2 > Community Pharmacists’ Attitudes, Perceptions, and Barriers...
Text sizing:
A
A
A
Journal of Patient Safety:
doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000051
Original Articles

Community Pharmacists’ Attitudes, Perceptions, and Barriers Toward Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting in Malaysia: A Quantitative Insight

Elkalmi, Ramadan Mohamed BPharm, MPharm (ClinPharm), PhD*; Hassali, Mohamed Azmi BPharm (Hons), MPharm (ClinPharm), PhD; Ibrahim, Mohamed Izham M. BPharm (Hons), PhD; Jamshed, Shazia Qasim BPharm (Hons), MPhil (Pharmacology), PhD*; Al-lela, Omer Qutaiba B. BPharm, MPharm (ClinPharm), PhD*

Collapse Box

Abstract

Objectives: This study was designed to explore awareness and attitudes of community pharmacists toward the national ADR reporting system activities in the northern states of Malaysia.

Methods: A cross-sectional survey using a validated self-administered questionnaire was used in this study. The questionnaire was delivered to all community pharmacists (N = 470) practicing in the four northern states of Malaysia (Perlis, Kedah, Pulau Pinang and Perak) during the study period.

Results: A total of 470 survey forms were sent with one wave of reminders. Only 116 pharmacists responded to the survey (response rate of 25.2%). The total number of usable responses was 104 (24.7%). The survey findings revealed that nearly three-quarters of pharmacists (n = 75; 72.1%) were not aware of the pharmacovigilance activities run by the drug regulatory authority in Malaysia. Although more than half (n = 65, 61.5%) of the surveyed pharmacists emphasized the importance of ADR reporting, only 13 pharmacists (12.9%) claimed that they submitted ADR reports to the Malaysia Adverse Drug Reaction Advisory Committee (MADRAC) before this survey.

Barriers which prevent community pharmacists from ADR reporting were identified. These included lack of knowledge on how to report (n = 36; 34.7%), the unavailability of reporting forms (n = 44; 42.6%), and ignorance of where the report should be sent to (n = 46; 44.6%).

Conclusions: Despite the unfamiliarity and the common misconceptions, the study results show that community pharmacists in the northern states of Malaysia have a very positive attitude toward the ADR reporting system in the country. However, the study findings highlight the urgent need for special education programs to establish continuous efforts to promote ADR reporting among community pharmacists. Further studies at the national level aimed at identifying and removing barriers that prevent community pharmacists from performing ADR reporting are required.

© 2014 by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Login

Article Tools

Share

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.