Journal of Addiction Medicine

Skip Navigation LinksHome > September 2010 - Volume 4 - Issue 3 > What Does Not Work? Expert Consensus on Discredited Treatmen...
Journal of Addiction Medicine:
doi: 10.1097/ADM.0b013e3181c5f9db
Original Article

What Does Not Work? Expert Consensus on Discredited Treatments in the Addictions

Norcross, John C. PhD; Koocher, Gerald P. PhD; Fala, Natalie C. BS; Wexler, Harry K. PhD

Collapse Box


Evidence-based practice promotes those research-supported treatments that have proven effective, but it rarely identifies discredited treatments that are to be avoided. We sought to establish a professional consensus on discredited addiction treatments using Delphi methodology. A panel of 75 experts participated in a 2-stage study, reporting familiarity with 65 treatments and rating these on a continuum from “not at all discredited” to “certainly discredited.” We report their composite opinions and significant differences that occurred as a function of the panelists’ theoretical orientation. The results require careful interpretation, but do offer a cogent first step in identifying a professional consensus of discredited treatments for addictions.

© 2010 American Society of Addiction Medicine

Follow us on Social Media!



Article Tools


Article Level Metrics

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.