You could be reading the full-text of this article now if you...

If you have access to this article through your institution,
you can view this article in

What Does Not Work? Expert Consensus on Discredited Treatments in the Addictions

Norcross, John C. PhD; Koocher, Gerald P. PhD; Fala, Natalie C. BS; Wexler, Harry K. PhD

Journal of Addiction Medicine:
doi: 10.1097/ADM.0b013e3181c5f9db
Original Article

Evidence-based practice promotes those research-supported treatments that have proven effective, but it rarely identifies discredited treatments that are to be avoided. We sought to establish a professional consensus on discredited addiction treatments using Delphi methodology. A panel of 75 experts participated in a 2-stage study, reporting familiarity with 65 treatments and rating these on a continuum from “not at all discredited” to “certainly discredited.” We report their composite opinions and significant differences that occurred as a function of the panelists’ theoretical orientation. The results require careful interpretation, but do offer a cogent first step in identifying a professional consensus of discredited treatments for addictions.

Author Information

From the Department of Psychology, University of Scranton (JCN, NCF), Scranton, PA; Dean’s Office, Simmons College (GPK), Boston, MA; and National Development and Research Institutes (HKW), New York, NY.

Received for publication April 17, 2009; accepted October 13, 2009.

Send correspondence and reprint requests to John C. Norcross, PhD, Department of Psychology, University of Scranton, Scranton, PA 18510-4596. e-mail:

© 2010 American Society of Addiction Medicine