Skip Navigation LinksHome > June 2012 - Volume 200 - Issue 6 > A Critique of the DSM-5 Field Trials
Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease:
doi: 10.1097/NMD.0b013e318257c699
Original Article

A Critique of the DSM-5 Field Trials

Jones, K. Dayle PhD, LMHC

Collapse Box


Abstract: This article provides an overview and critique of the field trials for the current revision of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5). The purpose of the DSM-5 field trials was to evaluate the use, feasibility, safety, reliability, and validity of the DSM-5 proposals. In this article, the procedures for evaluating these properties of the DSM-5 are reviewed, and several concerns—such as delays, disorganization, missed deadlines, field trial cancelations, lack of adequate validity testing, and high clinician attrition rates—and their likely impact on the field trial results are presented.

© 2012 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.


Article Tools


Article Level Metrics

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.