Institutional members access full text with Ovid®

Share this article on:

A Critique of the DSM-5 Field Trials

Jones, K. Dayle PhD, LMHC

Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease: June 2012 - Volume 200 - Issue 6 - p 517–519
doi: 10.1097/NMD.0b013e318257c699
Original Article

Abstract: This article provides an overview and critique of the field trials for the current revision of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5). The purpose of the DSM-5 field trials was to evaluate the use, feasibility, safety, reliability, and validity of the DSM-5 proposals. In this article, the procedures for evaluating these properties of the DSM-5 are reviewed, and several concerns—such as delays, disorganization, missed deadlines, field trial cancelations, lack of adequate validity testing, and high clinician attrition rates—and their likely impact on the field trial results are presented.

Mental Health Counseling Program, Department of Educational and Human Sciences, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL.

Editor’s note: Proposed DSM-5 criteria sets do not represent the final DSM-5 criteria for the disorders.

Send reprint requests to K. Dayle Jones, PhD, LMHC, Mental Health Counseling Program, Department of Educational and Human Sciences, University of Central Florida, PO Box 161250, Orlando, FL 32816-1250. E-mail: daylejones@ucf.edu.

© 2012 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.