Skip Navigation LinksHome > January 2011 - Volume 199 - Issue 1 > Is Torture Reliably Assessed and a Valid Indicator of Poor M...
Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease:
doi: 10.1097/NMD.0b013e3182051501
Original Articles

Is Torture Reliably Assessed and a Valid Indicator of Poor Mental Health?

Hollifield, Michael MD*; Warner, Teddy D. PhD†; Westermeyer, Joseph MD, PhD‡§

Collapse Box

Abstract

Torture is thought to confer worse mental health than other war-related traumatic events. However, reliability of torture assessment and validity of torture constructs as indicators of poor mental health have not been systematically evaluated. Study aims were to assess the psychometric properties of 2 common torture constructs. Refugees were assessed for having experienced torture by 1 subjective and 1 objective criterion. A subset was interviewed about definitions and effects of torture. Reliability and validity of torture constructs were assessed with general linear models. Interview data were analyzed for consistency of themes. Reliability of torture constructs was moderate, which paralleled inconsistencies in interview themes. Both torture criteria had similar dose-dependent relationships to mental health. Multivariate analyses showed that torture was not an independent predictor of poor mental health when controlling for the number of war-related events. Further work is needed to define torture from distinct medical and legal perspectives to improve reliability and validity.

© 2011 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.

Login

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.