OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to describe the impact of California’s nurse-to-patient ratios on patient-level outcomes from a comprehensive literature review.
BACKGROUND: While implemented in 2004, questions remain about the effects the ratios have had on patients.
METHODS: A comprehensive literature review was conducted.
RESULTS: Patient outcome results are mixed in the 8 identified studies, with 3 studies finding both positive and negative outcomes and 5 studies reporting no significant changes in patient outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: Findings from this review suggest some improvements have resulted from the implementation of staffing ratios, but the positives have not been as significant and widespread as predicted. Further studies are needed to explore the relationship between patient outcomes and mandated staffing levels in this state and other settings.
Author Affiliation: Assistant Professor, Orvis School of Nursing, University of Nevada, Reno.
The author declares no conflicts of interest.
Correspondence: Dr Serratt, University of Nevada, Reno, 1664 N Virginia St, Reno, NV 89557 (firstname.lastname@example.org).
Supplemental digital content is available for this article. Direct URL citations appear in the printed text and are provided in the HTML and PDF versions of this article on the journal’s Web site (www.jonajournal.com).