Skip Navigation LinksHome > July/August 2010 - Volume 40 - Issue 7/8 > A Comparison of Working Conditions Among Nurses in Magnet® a...
Journal of Nursing Administration:
doi: 10.1097/NNA.0b013e3181e93719

A Comparison of Working Conditions Among Nurses in Magnet® and Non-Magnet® Hospitals

Trinkoff, Alison M. ScD, RN, FAAN; Johantgen, Meg PhD, RN; Storr, Carla L. ScD; Han, Kihye MS, RN; Liang, Yulan PhD; Gurses, Ayse P. PhD; Hopkinson, Susan MS, RN

Collapse Box


Objectives: To compare working conditions (ie, schedule, job demands, and practice environment) of nurses working in American Nurses Credentialing Center-designated Magnet® and non-Magnet® hospitals.

Background: Although nurse retention has been reported as more favorable among Magnet hospitals, controversy still exists on whether Magnet hospitals have better working conditions.

Method: A secondary data analysis was conducted of the Nurses Worklife and Health Study using responses from the 837 nurses working in 171 hospitals: 14 Magnet and 157 non-Magnet facilities in the Wave 3 follow-up survey. Contingency tables and t tests compared working conditions by Magnet status. To accommodate clustering of nurses in hospitals, the Huber-White sandwich estimator was used to obtain robust SEs and variance estimates.

Result: Nurses in Magnet hospitals were significantly less likely to report jobs that included mandatory overtime (P =.04) or on-call (P =.01), yet hours worked did not differ. They also reported significantly lower physical demands (P =.03), although the means for Magnet hospital nurses and non-Magnet nurses were quite similar (30.1 vs 31.0). Furthermore, comparison of the groups on nursing practice environment and perceived patient safety found no significant differences.

Conclusion: Working conditions reported by nurses working in Magnet and non-Magnet hospitals varied little.

© 2010 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.



Article Tools


Article Level Metrics