Institutional members access full text with Ovid®

Share this article on:

Cost-Effectiveness of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy and a Workplace Intervention for Employees on Sickness Absence due to Mental Disorders.

Finnes, Anna MS; Enebrink, Pia PhD; Sampaio, Filipa PhD; Sorjonen, Kimmo PhD; Dahl, JoAnne PhD; Ghaderi, Ata PhD; Nager, Anna PhD; Feldman, Inna PhD
Journal of Occupational & Environmental Medicine: Post Author Corrections: September 25, 2017
doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000001156
Original Article: PDF Only

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate cost-effectiveness of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) and workplace dialogue intervention (WDI), both as stand-alone interventions and in combination, compared with treatment as usual (TAU), for employees on sickness absence with mental disorders.

Methods: Employees (n = 352, 78.4% females) on sickness absence were randomized to one of four groups. Cost-utility analyses were conducted from a health care perspective and a limited societal perspective.

Results: All groups reported significant improvements in health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) and there were no significant differences in HRQoL or costs between groups. The probability of cost-effectiveness for ACT+WDI was 50% compared with ACT, indicating that both treatment alternatives could be considered equally favorable for decision-makers. TAU and WDI were rejected due to less economic efficiency.

Conclusion: Adding WDI to ACT cannot be recommended on the basis of our study results.

Copyright (C) 2017 by the American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine