To investigate the relationships between occupational, workplace, and demographic factors and the provision of multilevel exposure protection systems.
Respondents reporting dermal chemical exposure at work were asked about protective measures provided to them in the workplace, which we classified as personal protection or awareness measures. An ordered logistic model was used to investigate the odds of workers reporting that both, either or neither, types of exposure control measures were provided in their workplaces.
Larger workplace size and permanent and fixed-term employment were associated with exposure protection systems incorporating both hazard awareness and personal protective measures.
Our results indicate that employment in small workplaces, nonpermanent and self-employed workers may be important intervention targets for improving workers’ exposure protection. What this paper adds:
From the Monash Centre for Occupational and Environmental Health, Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University (Dr MacFarlane and Dr Smith and Dr Keegel), The Institute of Work and Health & Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Canada (Dr Smith), and McCaughy Centre, Melbourne School of Population Health, University of Melbourne (Dr Keegel), Australia.
Address correspondence to: Ewan MacFarlane, PhD, Monash Centre for Occupational and Environmental Health, Department of Epidemiology and preventive Medicine, Monash University, The Alfred Hospital, Commercial Rd, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, 3004 (Ewan.MacFarlane@monash.edu).
The analyses presented in this article are based on analyses undertaken under funding from Safe Work Australia (Commonwealth of Australia).
Dr MacFarlane was supported by a National Health and Medical Research Council Capacity Building grant, Dr Smith was supported by an Australian Research Council Discovery Early Career Research award, and Dr Keegel was supported by a National Health and Medical Research Council Public Health Training fellowship. The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.