Home Current Issue Previous Issues Published Ahead-of-Print For Authors Journal Info
Skip Navigation LinksHome > July 2006 - Volume 18 - Issue 3 > A Comparison of Effects of Alfentanil, Fentanyl, and Remifen...
Journal of Neurosurgical Anesthesiology:
July 2006 - Volume 18 - Issue 3 - pp 179-184
doi: 10.1097/01.ana.0000210998.10410.2e
Clinical Investigations

A Comparison of Effects of Alfentanil, Fentanyl, and Remifentanil on Hemodynamic and Respiratory Parameters During Stereotactic Brain Biopsy

Bilgin, Hülya; Basagan Mogol, Elif; Bekar, Ahmet; Isçimen, Remzi; Korfali, Gülsen

Collapse Box

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the effects of 3 different sedative-analgesic regimens in patients with intracranial mass lesions undergoing stereotactic brain biopsy. A 135 outpatients with American Society of Anesthesiologists I to II were divided into 3 groups: group A (n=45) received a loading dose of IV alfentanil 7.5 μg/kg followed by infusion rate of 0.25 μg/kg/min; group F (n=45) received a bolus dose of 1 μg/kg IV fentanyl and repeated as needed; and group R (n=45) received infusion of 0.05 μg/kg/min remifentanil. Target level of sedation was 3 to 4 of the Ramsay Sedation Scale. Systolic and diastolic blood pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate, peripheric oxygen saturation (SpO2), and end-tidal carbon dioxide were recorded at different stages of the procedures. The patients in group F had significantly lower mean heart rate than those in groups A and R, but this was not in the limits of the bradycardia. The patients in group A had significantly lower mean SpO2 than those in the other groups, but mean SpO2 values did not drop below 94%. There were no significant differences in end-tidal carbon dioxide and respiratory rate values among the groups. Our results suggest that all 3 regimens have relatively similar hemodynamic and respiratory responses. The use of bolus fentanyl technique caused less hemodynamic stability. The continuous infusion technique of remifentanil or alfentanil provided better control on hemodynamic parameters.

© 2006 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.

You currently do not have access to this article.

You may need to:

Note: If your society membership provides for full-access to this article, you may need to login on your society’s web site first.

Article Tools

You currently do not have access to this article.

You may need to:

Note: If your society membership provides for full-access to this article, you may need to login on your society’s web site first.

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.