Institutional members access full text with Ovid®

Share this article on:

Measurement Properties of the 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey in Stroke

Westergren, Albert; Hagell, Peter

Journal of Neuroscience Nursing: February 2014 - Volume 46 - Issue 1 - p 34–45
doi: 10.1097/JNN.0000000000000027
Article

ABSTRACT Background: The 12-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-12) was developed to measure perceived physical and mental health. Some studies of the psychometric properties, using classical test theory, of the SF-12 provide support for its use in patients with stroke, but it has not been scrutinized using recommended modern test theory approaches such as the Rasch measurement model among stroke survivors. Objectives: This study sought to explore the measurement properties of the SF-12 physical and mental health scales among people with stroke using the Rasch measurement model. Design: A cross-sectional design was used in this study. Methods: All patients discharged from a dedicated stroke unit in southern Sweden during 6 months were asked to participate 6 months later. Of 120 stroke survivors, 89 (74%) agreed to participate. Rasch analysis was used to assess the measurement properties of the SF-12 physical and mental component summary scores (PCS-12 and MCS-12, respectively). Results: For the PCS-12, we identified problems with targeting, overall and item-level fit, representing local response dependency, and multidimensionality. For the MCS-12, there were problems related to targeting (the persons felt better than the scale could conceptualize) and response categories that did not function as expected. However, MCS-12 items displayed reasonable model fit without indications of multidimensionality but with signs of local response dependency. Conclusion: The measurement properties of the MCS-12 in stroke appear reasonable unless milder mental health problems are of interest, whereas those of the PCS-12 are less acceptable. Given the interdependence between MCS-12 and PCS-12 that is inherent with the standard SF-12 scoring algorithm, such data should be interpreted with caution.

Questions or comments about this article may be directed to Albert Westergren, RN PhD, at Albert.Westergren@hkr.se. He is a Professor at the PRO-CARE Group, School of Health and Society, Kristianstad University, Kristianstad, Sweden.

Peter Hagell, RN PhD, is a Professor at the PRO-CARE Group, School of Health and Society, Kristianstad University, Kristianstad, Sweden.

Albert Westergren conceived and designed the study, carried out the analyses, and drafted the manuscript. Peter Hagell conceived and designed the study, revised the manuscript, and interpreted the data. Both authors read and approved the final manuscript.

This study was supported by the Swedish Research Council and the Skane County Council Research and Development Foundation.

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

© 2014 American Association of Neuroscience Nurses