You could be reading the full-text of this article now if you...

If you have access to this article through your institution,
you can view this article in

To Provoke or Not Provoke: Ethical Considerations in the Epilepsy Monitoring Unit

Updyke, Monica; Duryea, Barbara

Journal of Neuroscience Nursing:
doi: 10.1097/JNN.0b013e31828a414b
Article
Abstract

ABSTRACT: Epilepsy is the second most common neurological disorder after migraines and headaches, with an economic burden of 15.5 billion dollars annually. Most patients with epilepsy can be controlled with antiepileptic drugs. Those who remain uncontrolled are considered refractory and are often admitted to an epilepsy monitoring unit for definitive diagnosis. Nonepileptic seizures are a common differential diagnosis in persons with refractory seizures. It is helpful for providers to witness the patients’ seizures to make a definitive diagnosis for seizure classification. Frequently, unstandardized practice-provocation techniques are employed in an epilepsy monitoring unit setting. The purpose of these techniques is to elicit a seizure. A debate is occurring on whether the use of provocation techniques is ethical and necessary. This article will review the literature related to the current evidence and moral opinions swirling around this topic. It is important for the neuroscience nurse to be familiar with both sides of the seizure provocation debate as he or she will be on the front lines of shaping future policy and practice to come.

Author Information

Barbara Duryea, MSN, is Director of Research and Development at the John P. Murtha Neuroscience and Pain Institute, Conemaugh Health System, Johnstown, PA.

Questions or comments about this article may be directed to Monica Updyke, MSN ACNP-BC, at nursecop1@gmail.com. She is a Nurse Practitioner, Palliative Care, Conemaugh Memorial Medical Center, Johnstown, PA.

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

© 2013 American Association of Neuroscience Nurses