Skip Navigation LinksHome > Published Ahead-of-Print > Utility and Reproducibility of the International Federation...
Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease:
doi: 10.1097/LGT.0000000000000069
Original Article: PDF Only

Utility and Reproducibility of the International Federation for Cervical Pathology and Colposcopy Classification of Transformation Zones in Daily Practice: A Multicenter Study of the German Colposcopy Network.

Luyten, Alexander MD; Buttmann-Schweiger, Nina MPH; Hagemann, Ingke MD; Scherbring, Sarah MD; Boehmer, Gerd MD; Gieseking, Friederike MD; Woelber, Linn MD, PhD; Glasenapp, Frank MD; Hampl, Monika MD, PhD; Kuehler-Obbarius, Christina MD; van den Bergh, Marcus; Petry, Karl Ulrich MD, PhD; For the German Colposcopy Network (G-CONE) and the German Colposcopy Study Group

Open Access
Published Ahead-of-Print
Collapse Box

Abstract

Objective: To compare the distribution of International Federation for Cervical Pathology and Colposcopy (IFCPC) transformation zone (TZ) types among women in different age groups referred to 8 colposcopy clinics.

Materials and Methods: Between February 2012 and February 2013, we prospectively collected individual patient data from 8 clinics within the German Colposcopy Network (G-CONE). Data were analyzed using ODSdysplasie, software designed to allow continuous quality assessment in colposcopy clinics. The distribution of IFCPC-classified TZ was compared between different centers for the following age groups: younger than 30 years, between 30 and 50 years, and older than 50 years.

Results: Of 3,761 patients included in the analysis, 2,153 (57%) were classified as having type 2 TZ, 906 (24%) as type 1 TZ, and 702 (19%) as type 3 TZ. Type 3 TZ was the most commonly reported type in women older than 50 years (70%). We found that the relative distribution of type 3 TZ between age groups was similar in the participating colposcopy clinics. However, there was evidence of heterogeneous distribution of types 1 and 2 TZ between age groups in different clinics, ranging from 7.8% to 66.4% for type 1 TZ in women younger than 30 years and 28.9% to 78.1% for type 2 TZ in women 30 to 50 years old.

Conclusions: Although IFCPC type 3 TZ seems to be a reproducible finding, the distribution of types 1 and 2 TZ showed significant heterogeneity. A more precise anatomic distinction between types 1 and 2 TZ in the IFCPC terminology could improve reporting of colposcopy findings.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License, where it is permissible to download and share thework provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially.

Copyright (C) 2014 by the American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology

Login

Article Tools

Share

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.