Skip Navigation LinksHome > January 2002 - Volume 6 - Issue 1 > Using Cytology to Evaluate the Endocervical Canal After Loop...
Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease:
Original Articles

Using Cytology to Evaluate the Endocervical Canal After Loop Excision

Dinh, Tri A. MD*; Schnadig, Vicki J. MD; Logrono, Roberto MD; Hannigan, Edward V. MD*; Santoso, Joseph T. MD*

Collapse Box


Objective: This study assesses cytology to evaluate the endocervical canal immediately after loop excision.

Material and Methods: In 103 patients, we performed a cytologic smear and endocervical curettage immediately after loop excision. Diagnoses were made independently by two cytopathologists and compared to histology. Diagnostic agreement was evaluated statistically.

Results: Cytopathologist “A” found a sensitivity of 1.0, specificity of 0.9, positive predictive value (PPV) of 0.44 and negative predictive value (NPV) of 1.0. Cytopathologist “B” found a sensitivity of 0.88, specificity of 0.78, PPV of 0.3 and NPV of 0.98. There was good agreement between the two cytopathologists (kappa = 0.42, 95% CI = 0.25, 0.60). Twenty-five endocervical curettage specimens were insufficient for diagnosis. Seven and 4 cytology specimens were judged unsatisfactory by each cytopathologist, respectively. Histologic and cytologic evaluation charges were $283 and $60.50 per patient, respectively.

Conclusion: The use of cytology efficiently evaluates the endocervical canal after loop excision.

©2002The American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology


Article Tools


Article Level Metrics

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.