Rathod, Dhanesh B. MD, MPH; Salahudeen, Abdulla K. MD
From the Nephrology Section, Department of General Internal Medicine, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Received May 9, 2011, and in revised form July 5, 2011.
Accepted for publication July 6, 2011.
Reprints: Abdulla K. Salahudeen, MD, Department of General Internal Medicine AT&EC, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Box 1465, Houston TX 77030. E-mail: email@example.com.
Dr. Salahudeen had received a grant support from Amgen Inc for an investigator-initiated grant proposal.
Erythropoietin (EPO) is used at present in clinical practice to stimulate red cell production. However, a number of reports have emerged suggesting the presence of nonerythropoietic properties for EPO. Chief among them is its ability to confer protection against acute tissue injury. In this report, we briefly review the role of EPO in tissue protection and provide examples of tissue protection using cisplatin-induced kidney injury model. Also provided is a brief description of potential pathways through which EPO may be mediating this effect.
The identification and cloning of erythropoietin (EPO) and the recombinant production of EPO have been a remarkable milestone in medical therapeutics. Since the therapeutic introduction of EPO a few decades ago, it has been used primarily to stimulate red cell production. However, a number of experimental reports during the last 2 decades have suggested that EPO may have other functional properties other than its widely recognized erythroid-stimulating property. A prominent one is its ability to confer protection to nonerythroid cells and tissues against injury partly through its antiapoptotic property. Indeed, several studies have demonstrated that EPO can suppress cell death and modulate organ function in the setting of injury.1-4 One of the earlier studies was that of Siren et al.,1 in which administration of EPO both in vitro and in vivo was associated with reduced neuronal apoptosis and improved motor function. Moreover, early on, it was demonstrated that erythropoietic property of EPO can be dissociated from its cytoprotective property. For example, by removing the sialo moiety from EPO molecule, the asialo EPO was shown to confer neuroprotection in the absence of erythropoiesis.5
ROLE OF EPO IN KIDNEY PROTECTION
The role of EPO in protecting kidneys against injury has also been demonstrated in several models.6,7 Using the cisplatin-nephrotoxicity model, it has been shown in the rats that EPO administration before or soon after cisplatin can reduce acute kidney injury.8 The cisplatin-induced kidney injury is an interesting model because it mimics to a greater extent what happens in the kidneys of cancer patients receiving cisplatin; that is, cisplatin at higher doses as in rat kidneys can cause acute tubular necrosis and apoptosis.8 It is considered that because intracellular chloride concentration is very low compared with extracellular compartments, cisplatin once enters the tubular cells and tends to lose its chloride moieties.9 Loss of chlorides leaves the platinum highly unstable, susceptible to free-radical formation. Cisplatin at least in part through radical mechanism causes cell death through both necrosis and apoptosis.9
IN VIVO AND IN VITRO EXPERIENCE WITH EPO
In one of our studies, EPO provided a dose-dependent protection against cisplatin-induced apoptosis of human renal proximal tubular cells in culture.8 In contrast, an inactive EPO, synthesized deliberately with incorrect amino acid sequence to prevent it from binding to the EPO receptor (EPOR) site, had no effect on preventing cisplatin-induced apoptosis, suggesting protection as a function of EPO-EPOR interaction. Similar findings of cytoprotection as in EPO were also reproduced when darbepoetin (DPO), a long-acting EPO, was used in a repeat experiment. Some of these findings were extended to animal models in which rats were injected intravenously with cisplatin 5.5 mg per kg of body weight as a single dose to test the efficacy of erythropoiesis-stimulating proteins (ESPs) (EPO or DPO) as kidney-protective agent.8 Various dosing and timing regimens were used, and kidney function data and histology were obtained. The control animals injected with saline had no increase in serum creatinine or hematocrit. However, animals injected with cisplatin had a significant increase in serum creatinine, but the rise in serum creatinine was significantly lower in animals pretreated with DPO (Fig. 1). In our study, although protection was consistently demonstrated, renal protection was incomplete, suggesting that ESPs reduce the extent and duration of renal injury, but other mechanisms of injury not amenable to ESPs are present. Of note is that the protection was present even if ESPs were administered after injury. The in situ staining for apoptosis in the kidneys of cisplatin-injected rats showed evidence for extensive apoptotic cell death compared with staining in the kidneys of saline-injected rats. However, the striking finding was the significant reduction in cisplatin-induced renal tubular apoptosis of animals pretreated with DPO. Prevention of necrotic injury by ESPs was less impressive and might explain for the presence of residual injury and incomplete renal protection in the ESP-treated groups.
In further mechanistic studies, EPO, but not inactive EPO, induced significant increase in STAT-5 and Akt phosphorylation, and pretreatment of cells with Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor AG 490 dose-dependently reversed the protection of EPO against the cisplatin. These findings collectively suggest an important role for EPO-EPOR interaction, and JAK-STAT pathway in EPO afforded cytoprotection against cisplatin.10,11
A clinical study by Corwin et al.12 observed a decrease in the mortality rates in patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) randomized to epoetin alfa (EPO) as compared with ICU patients who were given placebos. This effect was statistically significant in a subset of patients admitted with trauma. There was no difference in the hemoglobin levels and the units of blood transfused among the 2 groups, leading the authors to suggest that the observed effect was most likely due to the nonerythropoietic effect of EPO. However, there was significantly higher occurrence of thrombotic and thromboembolic complications in the EPO group.12 The latter finding suggests that an ideal molecule in this setting is a tailor-made one that is tissue-protective but devoid of thrombotic or erythropoietic properties. Others have also suggested that EPO cytoprotection may stem from its cytokine and antiapoptotic properties.13,14
POSSIBLE SIGNALING PATHWAY FOR THE CYTOPROTECTIVE PROPERTIES
Based on immunoprecipitation studies, it has been suggested that part of the tissue-protective properties might emerge through the β common receptor (βCR) pathway (Fig. 2).15 The canonical EPO pathway involves the binding of 2 EPO ligands with the EPOR homodimeric receptors on cell membranes, which in turn causes the EPOR conformational changes leading to the activation of JAK1-2-STAT 3 or 5A pathway via phosphorylation.16,17 The phosphorylation and activation of phosphoinositol 3-kinase and subsequently that of Akt kinase also lead to the inhibition of apoptosis. The alternate pathway involving βCR pathway is considered primarily protective and involves the binding of 2 EPO molecules to a heterodimeric receptor complex consisting of EPOR and βCR (Fig. 2), which can lead to the activation of the RAF-MEK-ERK pathway regulating cell proliferation and apoptosis.18 That EPO's cytoprotection could be mediated through the βCR pathway19,20 raises the possibility that EPO molecules could be modified to specifically activate the cytoprotective but not the erythropoietic signaling. This is of particular importance since a clinical study12 had indicated that EPO compared with placebo in a subset of critically ill patients admitted to the ICU might have significantly lower mortality rate. The study also demonstrated as alluded to above that the patients who received EPO also had significantly higher incidence of thrombosis and thromboembolic phenomenon.12 Therefore, tailoring the EPO molecule to create new molecules that will only confer cytoprotection without erythropoietic or thrombotic property might be of particular use to reduce mortality and morbidities in patients with acute injuries. Dr. Brines and colleagues21 have developed such a molecule that seems to be devoid of EPO activity, yet in animal and cell culture studies seems to confer cytoprotective properties. Coleman and Brines13 had presented their related work in this symposium, and their article related to their presentation is published in this journal.
In summary, EPO and related proteins may have tissue-protective properties in addition to their well-known erythropoietic function. New experimental data suggest that new molecules tailor-made from EPO molecule may provide tissue protection without the complications associated with increased erythropoiesis and prothrombotic state.
1. Siren AL, Fratelli M, Brines M, et al. Erythropoietin prevents neuronal apoptosis after cerebral ischemia and metabolic stress. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98:4044-4049.
2. Junk AK, Mammis A, Savitz SI, et al. Erythropoietin administration protects retinal neurons from acute ischemia-reperfusion injury. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99:10659-10664.
3. Yang CW, Li C, Jung JY, et al. Preconditioning with erythropoietin protects against subsequent ischemia-reperfusion injury in rat kidney. FASEB J. 2003;17:1754-1755.
4. Calvillo L, Latini R, Kajstura J, et al. Recombinant human erythropoietin protects the myocardium from ischemia-reperfusion injury and promotes beneficial remodeling. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100:4802-4806.
5. Erbayraktar S, Grasso G, Sfacteria A, et al. Asialoerythropoietin is a nonerythropoietic cytokine with broad neuroprotective activity in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100:6741-6746.
6. Vesey DA, Cheung C, Pat B, et al. Erythropoietin protects against ischaemic acute renal injury. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2004;19:348-355.
7. Vaziri ND, Zhou XJ, Liao SY. Erythropoietin enhances recovery from cisplatin-induced acute renal failure. Am J Physiol. 1994;266:F360-F366.
8. Salahudeen AK, Haider N, Jenkins J, et al. Antiapoptotic properties of erythropoiesis-stimulating proteins in models of cisplatin-induced acute kidney injury. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2008;294:F1354-F1365.
9. Salahudeen A, Poovala V, Parry W, et al. Cisplatin induces N-acetyl cysteine suppressible F2-isoprostane production and injury in renal tubular epithelial cells. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1998;9:1448-1455.
10. Bittorf T, Seiler J, Ludtke B, et al. Activation of STAT5 during EPO-directed suppression of apoptosis. Cell Signal. 2000;12:23-30.
11. Bao H, Jacobs-Helber SM, Lawson AE, et al. Protein kinase B (c-Akt), phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase, and STAT5 are activated by erythropoietin (EPO) in HCD57 erythroid cells but are constitutively active in an EPO-independent, apoptosis-resistant subclone (HCD57-SREI cells). Blood. 1999;93:3757-3773.
12. Corwin HL, Gettinger A, Fabian TC, et al. Efficacy and safety of epoetin alfa in critically ill patients. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:965-976.
13. Coleman T, Brines M. Recombinant human erythropoietin in critical illness: a role beyond anemia? Crit Care. 2004;8:337-341.
14. Maiese K, Li F, Chong ZZ. New avenues of exploration for erythropoietin. JAMA. 2005;293:90-95.
15. Jubinsky PT, Krijanovski OI, Nathan DG, et al. The beta chain of the interleukin-3 receptor functionally associates with the erythropoietin receptor. Blood. 1997;90(5):1867-1873.
16. Hand CC, Brines M. Promises and pitfalls in erythropoietin-mediated tissue protection: are nonerythropoietic derivatives a way forward? J Investig Med. 2011;59:1073-1082.
17. Wojchowski DM, Gregory RC, Miller CP, et al. Signal transduction in the erythropoietin receptor system. Exp Cell Res. 1999;253(1):143-156.
18. Agell N, Bachs O, Rocamora N, et al. Modulation of the Ras/Raf/MEK/ERK pathway by Ca(2+), and calmodulin. Cell Signal. 2002;14(8):649-654.
19. Brines M, Cerami A. Discovering erythropoietin's extra-hematopoietic functions: biology and clinical promise. Kidney Int. 2006;70:246-250.
20. Brines M. The therapeutic potential of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents for tissue protection: a tale of two receptors. Blood Purif. 2010;29:86-92.
21. Brines M, Patel NS, Villa P, et al. Nonerythropoietic, tissue-protective peptides derived from the tertiary structure of erythropoietin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105:10925-10930.