Institutional members access full text with Ovid®

Share this article on:

Effects of blood pressure lowering on outcome incidence in hypertension. 1. Overview, meta-analyses, and meta-regression analyses of randomized trials

Thomopoulos, Costasa; Parati, Gianfrancob,c; Zanchetti, Albertod,e

doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000000378

Background: Antihypertensive treatment is based on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) started since 1966. Meta-analyses comprehensive of all RCTs but limited to RCTs investigating blood pressure (BP) lowering in hypertensive patients are lacking.

Objectives: Two clinical questions were investigated: the extent of different outcome reductions by BP lowering in hypertensive patients, and the proportionality of outcome reductions to SBP, DBP, and pulse pressure (PP) reductions.

Methods: PubMed between 1966 and December 2013 (any language), Cochrane Collaboration Library and previous overviews were used as data sources for identifying and selecting all RCTs comparing the antihypertensive drugs with placebo or less intense BP lowering (intentional BP-lowering RCTs); comparing BP-lowering drugs with placebo without BP-lowering intention, but with BP difference (nonintentional BP-lowering RCTs); and enrolling at least 40% hypertensive patients. RCTs on acute myocardial infarction, heart failure, acute stroke, and dialysis were excluded. RCT quality was assessed by scoring. Risk ratios and 95% confidence interval (CI), standardized to 10/5 mmHg SBP/DBP reduction, of seven fatal and nonfatal outcomes were calculated (random-effects model). The relationships of different outcome reductions to SBP, DBP, and PP reductions were investigated by meta-regressions.

Results: A total of 68 RCTs (245 885 individuals) were eligible, of which 47 (153 825 individuals) were ‘intentional’ RCTs. All outcomes were reduced (P < 0.001) by BP lowering, stroke [−36% (−29, −42)], and heart failure [−43% (−28, −54)] to a greater extent, with smaller reductions for coronary events [coronary heart disease (CHD): −16% (−10, −21)], cardiovascular [−18% (−11, −24)], and all-cause mortality [−11% (−5, −16)]. Absolute risk reductions were 17 (14, 20) strokes, 28 (19, 35) cardiovascular events, and 8 (4, 12) deaths prevented every 1000 patients treated for 5 years. Logarithmic risk ratios were related to SBP, DBP, and PP reductions (P = 0.001–0.003) for stroke and composite cardiovascular events, but not for CHD.

Conclusion: Meta-analyses of all BP-lowering RCTs involving hypertensive patients provide precise estimates of benefits (larger for stroke and heart failure, but also significant for CHD and mortality). Absolute risk reductions are substantial. Relationships of logarithmic risk ratios with BP reductions imply risk reduction increases progressively to a smaller extent the larger the BP reduction.

aDepartment of Cardiology, Helena Venizelou Hospital, Athens, Greece

bDepartment of Cardiovascular, Neural and Metabolic Sciences, San Luca Hospital, Istituto Auxologico Italiano IRCCS

cDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Milan Bicocca

dScientific Direction, Istituto Auxologico Italiano IRCCS

eCentro Interuniversitario di Fisiologia Clinica e Ipertensione, University of Milan, Milan, Italy

Correspondence to Alberto Zanchetti, Professor, Direzione Scientifica, Istituto Auxologico Italiano, Via L. Ariosto, 13, I-20145 Milan, Italy. Tel: +39 2 619112237; fax: +39 2 619112901; e-mail:

Abbreviations: BP, blood pressure; CHD, coronary heart disease; CI, confidence interval; HF, heart failure; JNC, Joint National Committee; NNT, number needed to treat; PP, pulse pressure; PRISMA, Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses; RCT, randomized controlled trial; RR, risk ratio

Received 7 July, 2014

Revised 6 August, 2014

Accepted 7 August, 2014

Supplemental digital content is available for this article. Direct URL citations appear in the printed text and are provided in the HTML and PDF versions of this article on the journal's Website (

© 2014 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins