Journal of Hypertension

Skip Navigation LinksHome > January 2014 - Volume 32 - Issue 1 > Test characteristics of the aldosterone-to-renin ratio as a...
Journal of Hypertension:
doi: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e3283656b54
ORIGINAL PAPERS: Aldosteronism

Test characteristics of the aldosterone-to-renin ratio as a screening test for primary aldosteronism

Jansen, Pieter M.a; van den Born, Bert-Jan H.b; Frenkel, Wijnanda J.b; de Bruijne, Emile L.E.c; Deinum, Jaapd; Kerstens, Michiel N.e; Smulders, Yvo M.f; Woittiez, Arend Jang; Wijbenga, Johanna A.M.h; Zietse, Roberta; Danser, A.H. Jana; van den Meiracker, Anton H.a

Collapse Box


Background: The aldosterone-to-renin ratio (ARR) is a widely used screening test for primary aldosteronism. Current guidelines recommend a cut-off value of 91 pmol/mU. Studies on its sensitivity, specificity, reproducibility and the role of medication have been conflicting. We prospectively assessed the test characteristics of the ARR and the effect of combination antihypertensive treatment.

Methods: In 178 patients with persistent hypertension despite the use of at least two antihypertensives, plasma renin and aldosterone were assessed twice within an interval of 4 weeks. All patients underwent an intravenous salt loading test. A posttest plasma aldosterone exceeding 235 pmol/l was considered diagnostic for primary aldosteronism. ARR was repeated after 4 weeks of standardized treatment with a calcium channel blocker and/or α-adrenergic-receptor blocker.

Results: The prevalence of primary aldosteronism was 15.2%. The median ARR was 35.0 (interquartile range 16.2–82.0) in primary aldosteronism versus 7.1 (2.2–17.5) pmol/mU in essential hypertensive patients (P < 0.001). Under random medication, the ARR had 22.2% sensitivity and 98.7% specificity. On standardized treatment, the ARR rose from 9.6 (2.5–24.8) to 21.4 (10.8–52.1) (P < 0.001). Multivariate regression showed that angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE)-inhibitors and angiotensin II-receptor blockers were responsible for the lower ARR during random treatment. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was, however, similar under random and standardized treatment (84 vs. 86%, respectively, P = 0.314). Bland–Altman plots showed an almost five-fold difference in ARR values taken under the same conditions.

Conclusion: ARR sensitivity for primary aldosteronism is low when the recommended cut-off is used. Reproducibility is also poor, stressing the need for alternative screening tests.

© 2014 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins


Article Tools


Article Level Metrics

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.