Skip Navigation LinksHome > April/June 2013 - Volume 36 - Issue 2 > Development and Validation of a Falls-Grading Scale
Journal of Geriatric Physical Therapy:
doi: 10.1519/JPT.0b013e31825f6777
Research Reports

Development and Validation of a Falls-Grading Scale

Davalos-Bichara, Marcela MD1,8; Lin, Frank R. MD, PhD1; Carey, John P. MD1; Walston, Jeremy D. MD2; Fairman, Jennifer E. CMI, FAMI3; Schubert, Michael C. PT, PhD1; Barron, Jeremy S. MD2; Hughes, Jennifer PhD2; Millar, Jennifer L. PT4; Spar, Anne PT4; Weber, Kristy L. MD5; Ying, Howard S. MD6; Zackowski, Kathleen M. PhD, OT4,9; Zee, David S. MD7; Agrawal, Yuri MD1

Supplemental Author Material
Collapse Box


Background and Purpose: The recording of fall events is usually subjective and imprecise, which limits clinical practice and falls-related research. We sought to develop and validate a scale to grade near-fall and fall events on the basis of their severity represented by the use of health care resources, with the goal of standardizing fall reporting in the clinical and research settings.

Methods: Qualitative instrument development was based on a literature review and semistructured interviews to assess face and content validity. We queried older individuals and health care professionals with expertise in the care of patients at risk of falling about clinically important differences to detect and how to optimize the scale's ease of use. To assess the scale's interrater reliability, we created 30 video-vignettes of falls and compared how health care professionals and volunteers rated each of the falls according to our grading scale.

Results: We developed the illustrated 4-point Hopkins Falls Grading Scale (HFGS). The grades distinguish a near-fall (grade 1) from a fall for which an individual did not receive medical attention (grade 2), a fall associated with medical attention but not hospital admission (grade 3), and a fall associated with hospital admission (grade 4). Overall, the HFGS exhibited good face and content validity and had an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.998.

Conclusion: The 4-point HFGS demonstrates good face and content validity and high interrater reliability. We predict that this tool will facilitate the standardization of falls reporting in both the clinical and research settings.

Copyright © 2013 the Section on Geriatrics of the American Physical Therapy Association


Article Tools


Article Level Metrics

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.