TNFα antagonists are the current gold standard among biologic therapies for the treatment of psoriasis as well as being treatment options for psoriatic arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, and Crohn’s disease (Tak & Kalden, 2011). However, because TNFα acts broadly to stimulate immune responses and induce other inflammatory cytokines, inhibiting TNFα can potentially result in adverse events (AEs) such as infections, malignancies, neurologic complications, and autoimmune disorders (Silva, Ortigosa, & Benard, 2010; Tak & Kalden, 2011). Key efficacy findings from psoriasis RCTs of etanercept, infliximab, and adalimumab are presented here, followed by a discussion of safety and tolerability factors to consider when prescribing TNFα antagonists.
The first biologic agent approved for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis was etanercept, a recombinant human TNFα receptor protein that inhibits both soluble and membrane-bound TNFα (Levy, Solomon, & Emer, 2012). Etanercept received United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval for this indication in 2004 (U.S. FDA, n.d.), with a recommended starting dose of 50 mg twice weekly for 3 months, followed by maintenance dosing of 50 mg once weekly (Immunex Corporation, 2013). Etanercept is administered via subcutaneous injection; with proper training, etanercept can be self-administered using prefilled syringes or autoinjectors (Immunex Corporation, 2013).
In a 24-week double-blind RCT in 652 patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis, Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) improvements of 75% or more (PASI 75) from baseline were achieved at Week 12 (primary end point) by 49% of patients treated with etanercept 50 mg twice weekly (high dose), 34% of patients treated with etanercept 25 mg twice weekly (medium dose), and 14% of patients treated with etanercept 25 mg once weekly (low dose), compared with 4% of patients receiving placebo (all ps < .001; Leonardi et al., 2003). At the same time point, PASI improvements of 90% or more (PASI 90) were achieved by 22%, 12%, and 3% of patients in the etanercept high-, medium-, and low-dose groups, respectively, compared with 1% in the placebo group (p < .001 for the high- and medium-dose groups vs. placebo). After 12 weeks, patients in the placebo group were switched to double-blind etanercept 25 mg twice weekly. From Weeks 12 to 24, PASI responses were generally maintained in a dose-dependent manner (Table 1; Leonardi et al., 2003).
Subsequently, Papp and colleagues conducted a 24-week RCT to further assess the efficacy and safety of etanercept in patients with clinically stable moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis (Papp et al., 2005). In this study, 583 patients were randomized (1:1:1) to receive double-blind etanercept 25 or 50 mg twice weekly or placebo for 12 weeks; thereafter, all patients received open-label etanercept 25 mg twice weekly through Week 24. At the Week-12 primary end point, PASI 75 was achieved by 49% of patients in the higher dose group, 34% in the lower dose group, and 3% in the placebo group (both ps < .0001 vs. placebo), and PASI 90 was achieved by 21%, 11%, and 1%, respectively (both ps < .0001 vs. placebo). PASI responses were generally maintained through Week 24, with no apparent decrease observed in patients who underwent a dose reduction at Week 12 (Table 1; Papp et al., 2005).
Infliximab, a chimeric immunoglobulin (Ig)G1 antibody that neutralizes TNFα by binding to both its soluble and transmembrane forms (Levy et al., 2012), received FDA approval in 2006 for the treatment of severe plaque psoriasis (U.S. FDA, n.d.). Infliximab is administered by intravenous infusion, with a recommended starting dose of 5 mg/kg at 0, 2, and 6 weeks, followed by a maintenance regimen of 5 mg/kg every 8 weeks thereafter (Janssen Biotech, 2013a).
In the 50-week double-blind European Infliximab for Psoriasis (Remicade) Efficacy and Safety Study (EXPRESS), 378 patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis were randomized (4:1) to receive infusions of infliximab 5 mg/kg or placebo at Weeks 0, 2, and 6 and then every 8 weeks to Week 46. At Week 24, patients in the placebo group were switched to infliximab (Reich et al., 2005). At the Week-10 primary end point, PASI 75 was achieved by 80% of patients in the infliximab group and 3% of patients in the placebo group (p < .0001), and PASI 90 was achieved by 57% and 1%, respectively (p < .0001). PASI improvements were maintained through Week 24, and more than half of all patients achieved PASI 75 at Week 50 (Table 1; Reich et al., 2005).
The subsequent double-blind Evaluation of Infliximab for Psoriasis in a Remicade Efficacy and Safety Study was conducted to compare the efficacy and safety of infliximab 3 or 5 mg/kg administered to 835 patients at Weeks 0, 2, and 6, followed by either continuous (every 8 weeks) or intermittent (as needed) maintenance infusions through Week 50 (Menter et al., 2007). At the Week-10 primary end point, PASI 75 was achieved by 70% of patients in the lower dose group, 76% of the higher dose group, and 2% of the placebo group (both ps < .001 vs. placebo), and PASI 90 was achieved by 37%, 45%, and 0.5%, respectively (both ps < .001 vs. placebo). At Week 50, PASI scores were better maintained with continuous versus intermittent therapy within each group and with the higher versus lower dose (Table 1; Menter et al., 2007).
Adalimumab was the first fully human IgG1 monoclonal antibody to TNFα approved for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis (Levy et al., 2012). Adalimumab received FDA approval for this indication in 2008 (U.S. FDA, n.d.), with recommended subcutaneous administration at an initial dose of 80 mg, followed by 40 mg every other week (eow) starting 1 week after the initial dose (AbbVie, 2013). With proper training, adalimumab can be self-administered with single-use pens or prefilled syringes (AbbVie, 2013).
In a 60-week double-blind RCT in 147 patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis, patients were randomized (1:1:1) to receive adalimumab 80 mg at Weeks 0 and 1, then adalimumab 40 mg every week; adalimumab 80 mg at Week 0, and then adalimumab 40 mg eow; or placebo for 12 weeks. At Week 12, patients taking adalimumab could continue taking their assigned dose for a 48-week extension, and patients in the placebo group were switched to adalimumab 80 mg at Week 12 and then adalimumab 40 mg eow (Gordon et al., 2006). For the primary end point, PASI 75 was achieved at Week 12 by 80% of patients taking adalimumab once weekly, 53% of those taking adalimumab eow, and 4% of the placebo group (both ps < .001 vs. placebo); PASI 90 was achieved by 48% and 24% of patients in the active groups, respectively (PASI 90 data not provided for placebo group), and PASI 100 was achieved by 26%, 11%, and 0%, respectively (both ps < .001 vs. placebo). PASI responses were sustained through 60 weeks of treatment for most patients (Table 1; Gordon et al., 2006).
In the randomized controlled evaluation of adalimumab every other week in moderate-to-severe psoriasis, Menter and colleagues evaluated the short- and long-term efficacy and safety of adalimumab as a continuous or interrupted therapy (Menter et al., 2008). Patients (n = 1,212) were randomized (2:1) to receive an initial dose of adalimumab 80 mg at Week 0 followed by adalimumab 40 mg eow or placebo for 15 weeks in a double-blind fashion. From Weeks 17 to 31, all patients received open-label adalimumab of 40 mg eow. Patients who were originally randomized to active treatment and who achieved PASI 75 at Week 33 were rerandomized to adalimumab of 40 mg eow or placebo through Week 52. At the Week-16 primary end point, PASI 75 was achieved by 71% of the adalimumab group and 7% of the placebo group (p < .001), and PASI 90 was achieved by 45% and 2%, respectively (p < .001). Between Weeks 33 and 52, PASI improvements were lost in 28% of patients rerandomized to placebo compared with 5% of patients who received continuous adalimumab (p < .001; Table 1; Menter et al., 2008).
Safety and Tolerability of TNFα Antagonists
Overall, the RCTs summarized in Table 1 showed that etanercept, infliximab, and adalimumab are generally safe and well tolerated, with similar AE profiles. However, a number of rare but serious safety issues have been observed in large patient registries and in longer-term safety evaluations, including demyelination, infections, tuberculosis, reactivation of hepatitis B, malignancies, lymphoma, and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE; Papp, Dekoven, et al., 2012; Rustin, 2012). Black-box warnings related to these safety concerns as well as other warnings and precautions, contraindications, required monitoring, and known drug–drug interactions are summarized in Table 3.
Case reports of worsening or new-onset congestive heart failure (CHF) have been reported with TNFα antagonists; thus, it is recommended that these agents be used with caution in patients with a history of CHF, and infliximab >5 mg/kg is contraindicated in patients with moderate-to-severe CHF (Papp, Dekoven, et al., 2012). However, it should be noted that a meta-analysis of 22 RCTs involving more than 10,000 patients treated with biologics for plaque psoriasis failed to show an association between use of biologic agents and MACE rates (Ryan et al., 2011). In addition to the broad warnings about the risk for malignancies listed in Table 3, periodic skin examinations should be considered for all patients, especially those with other risk factors for skin cancer, such as prior treatment with psoralen plus ultraviolet A light or cyclosporine (Kamangar, Neuhaus, & Koo, 2012). Patients taking infliximab or adalimumab should also be monitored for the development of antidrug antibodies, as these can lower drug-serum concentrations and reduce clinical efficacy (Hsu, Snodgrass, & Armstrong, 2014). Antidrug antibodies have also been observed in clinical studies of etanercept, but these antibodies are nonneutralizing and are not associated with any apparent changes in clinical response (Hsu et al., 2014).
Ustekinumab is a fully humanized IgG1 monoclonal antibody specific for the common p40 subunit of IL-12 and IL-23, which prevents interaction between these cytokines and their receptor and inhibits T-cell differentiation (Levy et al., 2012). Ustekinumab was approved by the FDA in 2009 for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis (U.S. FDA, n.d.), with recommended subcutaneous injections at Weeks 0 and 4 and then every 12 weeks (Janssen Biotech, 2013b). The recommended ustekinumab dose is 45 mg for patients weighing ≤100 kg (220 lbs) and 90 mg for patients weighing >100 kg (220 lbs; Janssen Biotech, 2013b). With proper training, ustekinumab can be self-administered with single-use prefilled syringes (Janssen Biotech, 2013b).
The double-blind Psoriasis followed by long-term extension-1 (PHOENIX 1, n = 766; Leonardi et al., 2008) and Extension-2 (PHOENIX 2, n = 1,230; Papp et al., 2008) RCTs evaluated the efficacy and safety of ustekinumab (45 or 90 mg) administered at Weeks 0 and 4 and then every 12 weeks, compared with placebo given at Weeks 0 and 4 with crossover to ustekinumab at Week 12. At the Week-12 primary end point in PHOENIX 1 (Leonardi et al., 2008), PASI 75 was achieved by 67% of the 45-mg group, 66% of the 90-mg group, and 3% of the placebo group (both ps < .0001 vs. placebo), and PASI 90 was achieved by 42%, 37%, and 2% of patients, respectively (both ps < .0001 vs. placebo). Then, PASI 75 responders receiving ustekinumab were rerandomized at Week 40 to their current treatment or placebo. Over the course of this 76-week study, patients who received continuous ustekinumab therapy maintained their PASI improvements better than those who were withdrawn from treatment at Week 40 (Table 1; Leonardi et al., 2008).
Similarly, in PHOENIX 2, at the Week-12 primary end point, PASI 75 was achieved by 67% of the 45-mg group, 76% of the 90-mg group, and 4% of the placebo group (both ps < .0001 vs. placebo), and PASI 90 was achieved by 42%, 51%, and 1%, respectively (both ps < .0001 vs. placebo; Papp et al., 2008). At Week 28, ustekinumab partial responders (PASI 50 to <75) were rerandomized to continue receiving the same dose every 12 weeks or to receive intensified therapy with the same dose every 8 weeks through Week 52. Results indicated that dose intensification to 90 mg every 8 weeks may elicit a full response in patients who only partially respond to initial therapy (Table 1; Papp et al., 2008).
The first head-to-head trial of biologic agents for the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis was the 64-week Active Comparator (CNTO 1275/Enbrel) Psoriasis Trial, which compared ustekinumab 45 or 90 mg at Weeks 0 and 4 versus etanercept 50 mg twice weekly for 12 weeks in 903 patients (Griffiths et al., 2010). At Week 12, PASI 75 was achieved by 67% of patients treated with ustekinumab 45 mg and 74% of patients treated with ustekinumab 90 mg, compared with 57% of those who received etanercept 50 mg (p = .01 and p < .001, respectively); PASI 90 was achieved by 36%, 45%, and 23% of patients, respectively (both ps < .001 vs. etanercept). At Week 12, patients in the etanercept group who did not have a response (i.e., still had moderate, marked, or severe psoriasis) received ustekinumab at Weeks 16 and 20. Switching from etanercept to ustekinumab resulted in achievement of PASI 75 by 49% of patients (Table 1; Griffiths et al., 2010).
Safety and Tolerability of the IL-12/IL-23 Inhibitor
The PHOENIX 1 and 2 trials, as well as long-term safety studies, have shown that ustekinumab is generally safe and well tolerated (Table 1); the most common AEs with ustekinumab are similar to those observed with TNFα antagonists (e.g., nasopharyngitis, upper respiratory infection, headache, injection-site reactions, arthralgias; Leonardi et al., 2008; Papp et al., 2008; Papp, Griffiths, et al., 2013; Wu et al., 2012). Analyses of safety data from more than 3,000 patients treated with ustekinumab for up to 5 years showed no dose-related or accumulated toxicities and low rates of antidrug antibody formation (Papp, Griffiths, et al., 2013; Wu et al., 2012). In the Active Comparator (CNTO 1275/Enbrel) Psoriasis Trial study, the safety profile of ustekinumab was similar to that of etanercept; the most notable disparity was the reported rates of injection-site reaction AEs (4% with ustekinumab vs. 25% with etanercept; Griffiths et al., 2010). As with the TNFα antagonists, serious infections and malignancies have been observed as rare but potentially serious side effects of ustekinumab; however, unlike the TNFα antagonists, ustekinumab has no black-box warnings (Table 3; Janssen Biotech, 2013b). Although studies to date support that ustekinumab is generally safe and well tolerated, the most current (2009) guidelines from the British Association of Dermatology recommend ustekinumab as a second-line biologic therapy because the long-term safety profiles of the TNFα antagonists are better established (Smith et al., 2009). Furthermore, increased MACE rates were observed in early-stage trials of ustekinumab and briakinumab (an IL-12/IL-23 inhibitor that was in development but was withdrawn in 2011) compared with placebo, which prompted concern about the cardiovascular safety of targeting these cytokines (Ryan et al., 2011). However, recent studies have failed to show an increased risk for MACE with ustekinumab relative to placebo or TNFα antagonists (Papp, Griffiths, et al., 2013; Ryan et al., 2011).
As discussed in the previous sections, several recent studies have identified IL-17A as a central driver of the direct activation of keratinocytes in psoriasis, and three biologic agents (secukinumab, ixekizumab, and brodalumab) that target members of the IL-17 family or their receptors are currently in research clinical development for the management of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis (Chiricozzi et al., 2011; Chiricozzi & Krueger, 2013; Krueger et al., 2012). Unlike the other cytokines implicated in the pathogenic psoriasis pathway, it is hypothesized that IL-17A is a downstream cytokine, meaning that altering its levels may have fewer adverse effects on other biologic processes than alterations in TNFα or IL-12/IL-23 levels (Girolomoni, Mrowietz, & Paul, 2012).
Secukinumab (AIN457) is a fully human IgG1κ monoclonal antibody that selectively binds to and neutralizes IL-17A (Rich et al., 2013). Several phase 3 studies are evaluating the efficacy and safety of subcutaneous secukinumab for the treatment of plaque psoriasis (Table 2). The pivotal Full year Investigative eXamination of secukinumab versus eTanercept Using 2 dosing Regimens to determine Efficacy in psoriasis (FIXTURE) study consisted of four periods: screening, induction (of 12 weeks), maintenance (of 40 weeks), and follow-up (of 8 weeks; Langley et al., 2013). Patients (n = 1,306) were randomized to receive secukinumab 150 or 300 mg once weekly for 5 weeks followed by once-monthly dosing thereafter, etanercept 50 mg twice weekly for 12 weeks followed by 50 mg once weekly thereafter, or placebo. Overall, it was observed that patients’ skin cleared faster, and improvements were maintained longer with secukinumab compared with etanercept. At Week 12, assessment of the coprimary end points of PASI 75 and Investigator’s Global Assessment showed that the efficacy of secukinumab was superior to placebo (p < .0001) and to etanercept (p = .0250; Langley et al., 2013). In the Study Comparing secukinumab Use in Long-term Psoriasis maintenance therapy: fixed regimens vs reTreatment Upon start of RElapse (SCULPTURE), 966 patients received secukinumab 150 or 300 mg once weekly for 5 weeks (Mrowietz et al., 2013). Those who achieved PASI 75 were rerandomized at Week 8 to the same doses at either once-monthly intervals or as needed in response to psoriasis relapse. Patients who achieved PASI 75 at Week 12 were more likely to maintain their response if they received secukinumab at fixed monthly intervals compared with as-needed treatment at the start of relapse (Mrowietz et al., 2013). Results from SCULPTURE (Mrowietz et al., 2013) and the Efficacy of Response and Safety of 2 Fixed Secukinumab Regimens in Psoriasis study showed that secukinumab of 300 mg was more effective than secukinumab 150 mg (Table 2; Elewski et al., 2013). The most common AEs across these phase 3 studies were nasopharyngitis (exposure-adjusted incidence rates: 18.1%–31.1%, secukinumab 150 mg; 18.5%–35.2%, secukinumab 300 mg; 35.7% of etanercept; and 30.8%–32.8% of placebo), upper respiratory tract infection (5.8%–12.7%, 6.6%–11.1%, 6.4%, and 3.0%–3.5%, respectively), and headache (7.5%–12.4%, 5.0%–15.7%, 15.2%, and 15.1%–29.6%, respectively; Elewski et al., 2013; Langley et al., 2013; Mrowietz et al., 2013). Serious AE rates were 5.1%–6.4% with secukinumab 150 mg, 5.4%–8.3% with secukinumab 300 mg, 6.2% with etanercept, and 2.0%–2.1% with placebo.
In a regimen-finding, phase 2 study, patients (n = 404) were randomized to receive either a single injection of secukinumab 150 mg at Week 0; “early” secukinumab 150 mg at Weeks 0, 1, 2, and 4; once-monthly 150 mg secukinumab at Weeks 0, 4, and 8; or placebo (Rich et al., 2013). At Week 12, PASI 75 was achieved by 11% with a single injection, 54.5% with early treatment, and 42% with once-monthly treatment, compared with 1.5% with placebo (p < .001 for early and once-monthly regimens vs. placebo); PASI 90 was achieved by 3%, 32%, 17%, and 1.5% of patients, respectively (p < .001 for early and once-monthly regimens vs. placebo; Rich et al., 2013). In a second regimen-finding, phase 2 study (n = 125), PASI 75 was achieved at Week 12 by 82% of patients who received secukinumab 150 mg three times and 57% of patients who received secukinumab 75 mg three times (at Weeks 0, 4, and 8), compared with 9% with placebo (p < .001 and p = .002, respectively; Papp, Langley, et al., 2013). The types and frequencies of AEs, as well as rates of serious AEs, in the phase 2 studies (Papp, Langley, et al., 2013; Rich et al., 2013) were similar to those reported in the abovementioned phase 3 studies.
Ixekizumab (LY2439821) is a humanized IgG4 monoclonal antibody that binds and neutralizes IL-17A. In a phase 2 RCT, 142 patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis were randomized to receive subcutaneous ixekizumab (10, 25, 75, or 150 mg) or placebo at Weeks 0, 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16, with follow-up through 20 weeks (Leonardi et al., 2012). At the Week-12 primary end point, PASI 75 was achieved by 82%, 83%, 77%, and 29% of patients treated with ixekizumab 150, 75, 25, and 10 mg, respectively, compared with 8% with placebo (p < .001 for all doses except 10 mg); PASI 90 was achieved at the same time point by 71%, 59%, 50%, and 18% with the four ixekizumab doses, respectively, compared with no patient with placebo (p < .001 for all doses except 10 mg). The most common AEs included nasopharyngitis (ixekizumab, 10%–14%; placebo, 19%), upper respiratory infection (3%–10% and 4%), injection-site reaction (0%–10% and 0%), and headache (3%–14% and 4%). The AEs did not appear to be dose related, and no serious AEs were reported (Leonardi et al., 2012).
Several phase 3 studies of ixekizumab are ongoing. The study designs for these trials are summarized in Table 2.
Brodalumab (AMG 827) is a human IgG2 monoclonal antibody that binds to and blocks IL-17RA, the receptor subunit shared by IL-17A, IL-17F, and IL-17A/F heterodimer ligands. In a phase 2 RCT, 198 patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis were randomized to receive subcutaneous brodalumab (70, 140, 210, or 280 mg) or placebo on Day 1 and at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 (280 mg was only given on Day 1 and at Weeks 4 and 8), with a follow-up assessment at 12 weeks (Papp, Leonardi, et al., 2012). At the Week-12 primary end point, mean PASI improvement from baseline was 45%, 86%, 86%, and 76% among patients treated with brodalumab 70, 140, 210, and 280 mg, respectively, compared with 16% in the placebo group (all ps < .001). At the same time point, PASI 75 was achieved by 33%, 77%, 82%, and 67% of patients in the brodalumab groups, respectively, compared with no patients who received placebo (all ps < 0.001); PASI 90 was achieved by 18%, 72%, 75%, and 57% of patients in the four brodalumab groups, respectively, and by zero patients in the placebo group (all ps < .01). The most common AEs included nasopharyngitis (brodalumab, 8%; placebo, 8%), upper respiratory infection (8% and 5%), injection-site erythema (6% and 3%), arthralgia (4% and 3%), pain in extremity (5% and 0%), and nausea (4% and 3%). With the exception of nasopharyngitis and nausea, these events were most common in the high-dose group. Across the brodalumab groups, serious AEs were reported by two patients (renal colic and grade 3 neutropenia; Papp, Leonardi, et al., 2012).
Several phase 3 studies of brodalumab are ongoing. The study designs for these trials are summarized in Table 2.
In terms of efficacy, available biologic therapies can be expected to provide good PASI responses in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis; however, efficacy differences exist between the various agents. Although head-to-head data are limited, data suggest that ustekinumab and infliximab may provide better efficacy than etanercept and adalimumab (Bansback et al., 2009; Griffiths et al., 2010; Lin, Ringold, & Devine, 2012; Reich, Burden, Eaton, & Hawkins, 2012) and that secukinumab may be superior to etanercept (Langley et al., 2013). Results from ongoing head-to-head studies (e.g., ixekizumab vs. etanercept [NCT01597245] and brodalumab vs. ustekinumab [NCT01708603 and NCT01708629]) may further identify differences among the biologic therapies and help define a treatment hierarchy for managing patients with plaque psoriasis.
Available evidence suggests that the IL-17 inhibitors may provide an alternative approach to achieving targeted efficacy. As described herein, in clinical studies to date, a substantial proportion of patients have reported near-complete psoriasis clearance with IL-17A inhibitors, with maintenance of these improvements for up to 1 year (e.g., one study showed up to approximately two thirds of patients achieving PASI 90 at 1 year; Langley et al., 2013). This is a very relevant observation, as lack of efficacy and loss of efficacy over time are the most commonly cited reasons patients have given for discontinuing treatment with TNFα antagonists; for example, in a survey of over 1,000 patients who discontinued their psoriasis treatment regimen, lack of efficacy was the main reason patients discontinued TNFα therapy (reported by up to 34% of patients), followed by loss of efficacy over time (reported by up to 32% of patients; Yeung, Wan, et al., 2013).
For patients who do not achieve an adequate response with conventional systemic therapy or a previous biologic therapy, switching to a different biologic agent is a valid treatment strategy (Gottlieb et al., 2012; Strober et al., 2011). For example, in one study, roughly two thirds of patients who had an inadequate response to etanercept achieved cleared or minimal disease 10 weeks after switching to infliximab (Gottlieb et al., 2012). Similarly, a study by Strober and colleagues showed that more than half of patients who switched to adalimumab achieved cleared or minimal disease after having an inadequate response to etanercept, methotrexate, or narrow-band ultraviolet B therapy.
Safety and tolerability are also important factors when choosing psoriasis treatments. In a survey of expert European dermatologists, long-term safety was identified as the most important attribute these physicians consider when selecting a biologic agent to treat psoriasis (Guibal, Iversen, Puig, Strohal, & Williams, 2009). Because available biologics are all generally well tolerated, with similar long-term safety profiles and low reported rates of serious AEs, the choice of therapy is usually based on each patient’s underlying risk factors for serious infection and malignancy. For instance, TNFα antagonists should be used with caution in patients with CHF or risk factors for developing this condition (AbbVie, 2013; Immunex Corporation, 2013; Janssen Biotech, 2013a). Weight gain is also a potentially undesirable side effect that has been observed in patients taking TNFα inhibitors but not the IL-12/IL23 inhibitor ustekinumab (Gisondi et al., 2013), so it may be advisable to avoid these agents when obesity or weight gain are significant concerns. Early cardiovascular safety concerns with IL-12/IL-23 inhibitors (Ryan et al., 2011) may warrant caution when using ustekinumab until larger-scale, longer-term data are available on these risks. Although the long-term safety profiles of IL-17 inhibitors have yet to be confirmed, it has been hypothesized that, by providing more downstream-targeted therapy than existing biologics, these agents may have a more favorable AE profile, offering a new variant in the options for patients with psoriasis (Girolomoni et al., 2012).
Dosing frequency and route of administration may affect patient and physician preferences for one biologic agent over another, with less-frequent dosing often the preferred option for both providers and patients (Richter, Anton, Koch, & Dennett, 2003). Of the approved agents, ustekinumab has the most convenient dosing schedule, with administration required every 12 weeks after the initial dosing period (Sivamani et al., 2013). Many patients may also prefer self-administration over intravenous infusion, which may make infliximab a less desirable choice than the other available biologics that can all be self-administered by subcutaneous injection (Scarpato et al., 2010). Some biologic agents currently in development may be available as oral formulations (e.g., apremilast, tofacitinib), which may be more appealing than injectables to many patients (Schafer, 2012).
Patient-reported outcomes (e.g., improving quality of life and reducing feelings of frustration, self-consciousness, and depression) are an area of growing interest and should also be considered when deciding on the best treatment approach (Heller et al., 2012). Speaking with patients about their treatment goals, life circumstances, and preferred approach to disease management may help healthcare professionals decide which options are most suitable for different individuals (Uhlenhake & Mehregan, 2012). Noncompliance with therapy may be a sign that a patient’s therapy choice is not right for him or her, and understanding the causes of noncompliance may assist in providing better guidance for an alternative choice (Uhlenhake & Mehregan, 2012).
Special consideration is also required when deciding whether to use biologic agents to treat children with psoriasis. No biologic agents are currently approved in the United States to treat pediatric psoriasis, and data are limited in this population. However, etanercept and adalimumab are approved in the United States to treat juvenile idiopathic arthritis, and infliximab is approved to treat pediatric Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis (AbbVie, 2013; Immunex Corporation, 2013; Janssen Biotech, 2013a). The TNFα inhibitors are also approved to treat pediatric psoriasis in the European Union and Brazil (Luu & Cordoro, 2013). One RCT of etanercept (Paller et al., 2008) and numerous case studies of TNFα antagonists support their efficacy in the treatment of pediatric patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis (Luu & Cordoro, 2013). Data are extremely limited on the use of ustekinumab in pediatric patients, but a phase 3 study with this agent is ongoing in adolescents with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis (NCT01090427). By far, the greatest concern with using biologics in pediatric patients is the lack of long-term safety data in this population; given this limitation, biologic agents should be used with caution in children.
Biologic agents used for the management of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis are generally well-tolerated and effective treatment options that may result in clinical improvements. Not all agents work in all patients; therefore, it is critical to be aware of the multiple treatment options, many with different mechanisms of action. New agents in development may provide alternative options to existing biologic therapies for the achievement of rapid and sustained clearance of psoriatic lesions.
Technical assistance with editing and styling of the manuscript for submission was provided by Oxford PharmaGenesis, Inc., and was funded by Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation. The authors were fully responsible for all content and editorial decisions and received no financial support or other form of compensation related to the development of this manuscript. The opinions expressed in the manuscript are those of the authors, and Novartis Pharmaceuticals had no influence on the contents.
AbbVie. (2013). Humira (adalimumab) injection (prescribing information). North Chicago, IL: Author.
Bansback N., Sizto S., Sun H., Feldman S., Willian M. K., Anis A. (2009). Efficacy of systemic treatments for moderate to severe plaque psoriasis: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Dermatology 219 (3), 209–218.
Benson J. M., Peritt D., Scallon B. J., Heavner G. A., Shealy D. J., Giles-Komar J. M., Mascelli M. A. (2011). Discovery and mechanism of ustekinumab: A human monoclonal antibody targeting interleukin-12 and interleukin-23 for treatment of immune-mediated disorders. mAbs 3 (6), 535–545.
Cai Y., Shen X., Ding C., Qi C., Li K., Yan J. (2011). Pivotal role of dermal IL-17-producing γδ T cells in skin inflammation. Immunity 35 (4), 596–610.
Chiricozzi A., Krueger J. G. (2013). IL-17 targeted therapies for psoriasis. Expert Opinion on Investigational Drugs 22 (8), 993–1005.
Chiricozzi A., Guttman-Yassky E., Suárez-Fariñas M., Nograles K. E., Tian S., Cardinale I., Krueger J. G. (2011). Integrative responses to IL-17 and TNF-α in human keratinocytes account for key inflammatory pathogenic circuits in psoriasis. Journal of Investigative Dermatology 131 (3), 677–687.
Elewski B., Lebwohl M., Papp K., Nakagawa H., Sigurgeirsson B., Tsai T., Papavassilis C.; for the ERASURE Study Group. (2013). Secukinumab in subjects with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: Results from the efficacy of response and safety of 2 fixed secukinumab regimens in psoriasis (ERASURE), a pivotal phase 3 study. Poster presentation at: 22nd Annual Congress of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology, October 2–6, 2013, Istanbul, Turkey.
Feldman S., Behnam S. M., Behnam S. E., Koo J. Y. (2005). Involving the patient: Impact of inflammatory skin disease and patient-focused care. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology 53 (1 Suppl 1), S78–S85.
Focosi D., Maggi F., Pistello M., Boggi U., Scatena F. (2011). Immunosuppressive monoclonal antibodies: Current and next generation. Clinical Microbiology and Infection 17 (12), 1759–1768.
Girolomoni G., Mrowietz U., Paul C. (2012). Psoriasis: Rationale for targeting interleukin-17. British Journal of Dermatology 167 (4), 717–724.
Gisondi P., Conti A., Galdo G., Piaserico S., De Simone C., Girolomoni G. (2013). Ustekinumab does not increase body mass index in patients with chronic plaque psoriasis: A prospective cohort study. British Journal of Dermatology 168 (5), 1124–1127.
Golden J. B., McCormick T. S., Ward N. L. (2013). IL-17 in psoriasis: Implications for therapy and cardiovascular co-morbidities. Cytokine 62 (2), 195–201.
Gordon K. B., Langley R. G., Leonardi C., Toth D., Menter M. A., Kang S., Okun M. M. (2006). Clinical response to adalimumab treatment in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis: Double-blind, randomized controlled trial and open-label extension study. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology 55 (4), 598–606.
Gottlieb A. B., Kalb R. E., Blauvelt A., Heffernan M. P., Sofen H. L., Ferris L. K., Chevrier M. (2012). The efficacy and safety of infliximab in patients with plaque psoriasis who had an inadequate response to etanercept: Results of a prospective, multicenter, open-label study. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology 67 (4), 642–650.
Griffiths C. E., Strober B. E., van de Kerkhof P., Ho V., Fidelus-Gort R., Yeilding N., Menter Afor the ACCEPT Study Group. (2010). Comparison of ustekinumab and etanercept for moderate-to-severe psoriasis. New England Journal of Medicine 362 (2), 118–128.
Guibal F., Iversen L., Puig L., Strohal R., Williams P. (2009). Identifying the biologic closest to the ideal to treat chronic plaque psoriasis in different clinical scenarios: Using a pilot multi-attribute decision model as a decision-support aid. Current Medical Research and Opinion 25 (12), 2835–2843.
Heller M. M., Wong J. W., Nguyen T. V., Lee E. S., Bhutani T., Menter A., Koo J. Y. (2012). Quality-of-life instruments: Evaluation of the impact of psoriasis on patients. Dermatologic Clinics 30 (2), 281–291.
Hong J., Koo B., Koo J. (2008). The psychosocial and occupational impact of chronic skin disease. Dermatologic Therapy 21 (1), 54–59.
Hsu L., Snodgrass B. T., Armstrong A. W. (2014). Antidrug antibodies in psoriasis: A systematic review. British Journal of Dermatology 170 (2), 261–273.
Hueber W., Patel D. D., Dryja T., Wright A. M., Koroleva I., Bruin G., Gomez-Reino J. J., Foster C. S., Kim R. Y., Samson C. M., Falk N. S., Chu D. S., Callanan D., Nguyen Q. D, Rose K., Haider A., Di Padova F. (2010). Effects of AIN457, a fully human antibody to interleukin-17A, on psoriasis, rheumatoid arthritis, and uveitis. Science Translational Medicine 2 (52), 52ra72.
Immunex Corporation. (2013). Enbrel (etanercept) solution (prescribing information). Thousand Oaks, CA: Author.
Janssen Biotech. (2013a). Remicade (infliximab) lyophilized conentrate for injection (prescribing information). Horsham, PA: Author.
Janssen Biotech. (2013b). Stelara (ustekinumab) injection (prescribing information). Horsham, PA: Author.
Johnson-Huang L. M., Lowes M. A., Krueger J. G. (2012). Putting together the psoriasis puzzle: An update on developing targeted therapies. Disease Models and Mechanisms 5 (4), 423–433.
Kamangar F., Neuhaus I. M., Koo J. Y. (2012). An evidence-based review of skin cancer rates on biologic therapies. Journal of Dermatological Treatment 23 (4), 305–315.
Kimball A. B., Jacobson C., Weiss S., Vreeland M. G., Wu Y. (2005). The psychosocial burden of psoriasis. American Journal of Clinical Dermatology 6 (6), 383–392.
Krueger J. G., Fretzin S., Suárez-Fariñas M., Haslett P. A., Phipps K. M., Cameron G. S., Hoffman R. W. (2012). IL-17A is essential for cell activation and inflammatory gene circuits in subjects with psoriasis. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology 130 (1), 145–154.
Kurd S. K., Troxel A. B., Crits-Christoph P., Gelfand J. M. (2010). The risk of depression, anxiety, and suicidality in patients with psoriasis: A population-based cohort study. Archives of Dermatology 146 (8), 891–895.
Ladizinski B., Lee K. C., Wilmer E., Alavi A., Mistry N., Sibbald R. G. (2013). A review of the clinical variants and the management of psoriasis. Advances in Skin and Wound Care 26 (6), 271–284.
Langley R., Reich K., Griffiths C., Puig L., Spelman L., Rivas Zaldivar E., Papavassilis C.. (2013). Secukinumab compared with placebo and etanercept: A head-to-head comparison of two biologics in a phase 3 study of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis (FIXTURE). Oral presentation at the 22nd Annual Congress of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology, October 2–6, 2013, Istanbul, Turkey.
Leonardi C., Matheson R., Zachariae C., Cameron G., Li L., Edson-Heredia E., Banerjee S. (2012). Anti-interleukin-17 monoclonal antibody ixekizumab in chronic plaque psoriasis. New England Journal of Medicine 366 (13), 1190–1199.
Leonardi C. L., Kimball A. B., Papp K. A., Yeilding N., Guzzo C., Wang Y., Gordon K. B.PHOENIX 1 Study Investigators. (2008). Efficacy and safety of ustekinumab, a human interleukin-12/23 monoclonal antibody, in patients with psoriasis: 76-week results from a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (PHOENIX 1). Lancet 371 (9625), 1665–1674.
Leonardi C. L., Powers J. L., Matheson R. T., Goffe B. S., Zitnik R., Wang A., Gottlieb A. B.Etanercept Psoriasis Study Group. (2003). Etanercept as monotherapy in patients with psoriasis. New England Journal of Medicine 349 (21), 2014–2022.
Levy L. L., Solomon S. M., Emer J. J. (2012). Biologics in the treatment of psoriasis and emerging new therapies in the pipeline. Psoriasis: Targets and Therapy 2 29–43.
Lin V. W., Ringold S., Devine E. B. (2012). Comparison of ustekinumab with oher biological agents for the treatment of moderate to severe plaque psoriasis: A Bayesian network meta-analysis. Archives of Dermatology 148 (12), 1403–1410.
Luu M., Cordoro K. M. (2013). The evolving role of biologics in the treatment of pediatric psoriasis. Skin Therapy Letter 18 (2), 1–4.
Menter A., Feldman S. R., Weinstein G. D., Papp K., Evans R., Guzzo C., Gottlieb A. B. (2007). A randomized comparison of continuous vs. intermittent infliximab maintenance regimens over 1 year in the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology 56 (1), 31.e1–31.e15.
Menter A., Tyring S. K., Gordon K., Kimball A. B., Leonardi C. L., Langley R. G., Papp K. (2008). Adalimumab therapy for moderate to severe psoriasis: A randomized, controlled phase III trial. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology 58 (1), 106–115.
Mrowietz U., Leonardi C., Girolomoni G., Toth D., Morita A., Balki S., Papavassilis C.for the SCULPTURE Study Group. (2013). Secukinumab “fixed-interval” vs. “retreatment-as-needed” regimen for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: A study comparing secukinumab use in long-term psoriasis maintenance therapy (SCULPTURE). Oral presentation at the 22nd Annual Congress of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology, October 2–6, 2013, Istanbul, Turkey.
Nestle F. O., Kaplan D. H., Barker J. (2009). Psoriasis. New England Journal of Medicine 361 (5), 496–509.
Oh C. J., Das K. M., Gottlieb A. B. (2000). Treatment with anti-tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α) monoclonal antibody dramatically decreases the clinical activity of psoriasis lesions. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology 42 (5 Pt 1), 829–830.
Paller A. S., Siegfried E. C., Langley R. G., Gottlieb A. B., Pariser D., Landells I., Jahreis A.Etanercept Pediatric Psoriasis Study Group. (2008). Etanercept treatment for children and adolescents with plaque psoriasis. New England Journal of Medicine 358 (3), 241–251.
Papp K. A., Dekoven J., Parsons L., Pirzada S., Robern M., Robertson L., Tan J. K (2012). Biologic therapy in psoriasis: Perspectives on associated risks and patient management. Journal of Cutaneous Medicine and Surgery 16 (3), 153–168.
Papp K. A., Griffiths C. E., Gordon K., Lebwohl M., Szapary P. O., Wasfi Y., Reich KPHOENIX 1 Investigators; PHOENIX 2 Investigators; & ACCEPT Investigators. (2013). Long-term safety of ustekinumab in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis: Final results from 5 years of follow-up. British Journal of Dermatology 168 (4), 844–854.
Papp K. A., Langley R. G., Lebwohl M., Krueger G. G., Szapary P., Yeilding N., Reich K.PHOENIX 2 Study Investigators. (2008). Efficacy and safety of ustekinumab, a human interleukin-12/23 monoclonal antibody, in patients with psoriasis: 52-week results from a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (PHOENIX 2). Lancet 371 (9625), 1675–1684.
Papp K. A., Langley R. G., Sigurgeirsson B., Abe M., Baker D. R., Konno P., Richards H. B. (2013). Efficacy and safety of secukinumab in the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase II dose-ranging study. British Journal of Dermatology 168 (2), 412–421.
Papp K. A., Leonardi C., Menter A., Ortonne J. P., Krueger J. G., Kricorian G., Baumgartner S (2012). Brodalumab, an anti-interleukin-17-receptor antibody for psoriasis. New England Journal of Medicine 366 (13), 1181–1189.
Papp K. A., Tyring S., Lahfa M., Prinz J., Griffiths C. E., Nakanishi A. M., Melvin L. Etanercept Psoriasis Study Group. (2005). A global phase III randomized controlled trial of etanercept in psoriasis: Safety, efficacy, and effect of dose reduction. British Journal of Dermatology 152 (6), 1304–1312.
Reich K., Burden A. D., Eaton J. N., Hawkins N. S. (2012). Efficacy of biologics in the treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis: A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. British Journal of Dermatology 166 (1), 179–188.
Reich K., Nestle F. O., Papp K., Ortonne J. P., Evans R., Guzzo C., Griffiths C. E.EXPRESS Study Investigators. (2005). Infliximab induction and maintenance therapy for moderate-to-severe psoriasis: A phase III, multicentre, double-blind trial. Lancet 366 (9494), 1367–1374.
Rich P., Sigurgeirsson B., Thaci D., Ortonne J. P., Paul C., Schopf R. E., Papavassilis C. (2013). Secukinumab induction and maintenance therapy in moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase II regimen-finding study. British Journal of Dermatology 168 (2), 402–411.
Richter A., Anton S. E., Koch P., Dennett S. L. (2003). The impact of reducing dose frequency on health outcomes. Clinical Therapeutics 25 (8), 2307–2335.
Rustin M. H. (2012). Long-term safety of biologics in the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: Review of current data. British Journal of Dermatology 167 (Suppl 3), 3–11.
Ryan C., Leonardi C. L., Krueger J. G., Kimball A. B., Strober B. E., Gordon K. B., Menter A. (2011). Association between biologic therapies for chronic plaque psoriasis and cardiovascular events: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Journal of the American Medical Association 306 (8), 864–871.
Scarpato S., Antivalle M., Favalli E. G., Nacci F., Frigelli S., Bartoli F., Matucci Cerinic M.RIVIERA co-authors. (2010). Patient preferences in the choice of anti-TNF therapies in rheumatoid arthritis. Results from a questionnaire survey (RIVIERA study). Rheumatology 49 (2), 289–294.
Schafer P. (2012). Apremilast mechanism of action and application to psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. Biochemical pharmacology 83 (12), 1583–1590.
Silva L. C., Ortigosa L. C., Benard G. (2010). Anti-TNF-α agents in the treatment of immune-mediated inflammatory diseases: Mechanisms of action and pitfalls. Immunotherapy 2 (6), 817–833.
Sivamani R. K., Goodarzi H., Garcia M. S., Raychaudhuri S. P., Wehrli L. N., Ono Y., Maverakis E (2013). Biologic therapies in the treatment of psoriasis: A comprehensive evidence-based basic science and clinical review and a practical guide to tuberculosis monitoring. Clinical Reviews in Allergy and Immunology 44 (2), 121–140.
Smith C. H., Anstey A. V., Barker J. N., Burden A. D., Chalmers R. J., Chandler D. A., Ormerod A. D.(Chair of Guideline Group). (2009). British Association of Dermatologists’ guidelines for biologic interventions for psoriasis 2009. British Journal of Dermatology 161 (5), 987–1019.
Strober B. E., Poulin Y., Kerdel F. A., Langley R. G., Gu Y., Gupta S. R., Papp K. A. (2011). Switching to adalimumab for psoriasis patients with a suboptimal response to etanercept, methotrexate, or phototherapy: Efficacy and safety results from an open-label study. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology 64 (4), 671–681.
Tak P. P., Kalden J. R. (2011). Advances in rheumatology: New targeted therapeutics. Arthritis Research and Therapy 13 (Suppl 1), S5.
Uhlenhake E. E., Mehregan D. A. (2012). Managing psoriasis: What’s best for your patient? Journal of Family Practice 61 (7), 402–409, 451.
Villaseñor-Park J., Wheeler D., Grandinetti L. (2012). Psoriasis: Evolving treatment for a complex disease. Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine 79 (6), 413–423.
Wu Y., Chen J., Li Y. H., Ma G. Z., Chen J. Z., Gao X. H., Chen H. D. (2012). Treatment of psoriasis with interleukin-12/23 monoclonal antibody: A systematic review. European Journal of Dermatology 22 (1), 72–82.
Yeung H., Takeshita J., Mehta N. N., Kimmel S. E., Ogdie A., Margolis D. J., Gelfand J. M. (2013). Psoriasis severity and the prevalence of major medical comorbidity: A population-based study. Journal of the American Medical Association Dermatology 149 (10), 1173–1179.
Yeung H., Wan J., Van Voorhees A. S., Callis Duffin K., Krueger G. G., Kalb R. E., Gelfand J. M. (2013). Patient-reported reasons for the discontinuation of commonly used treatments for moderate to severe psoriasis. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology 68 (1), 64–72.
Young M. (2005). The psychological and social burdens of psoriasis. Dermatology Nursing 17 (1), 15–19.
Keywords:Copyright © 2014 by the Dermatology Nurses' Association.
Biologics; Efficacy; Pathogenesis; Psoriasis; Safety