Skip Navigation LinksHome > January/February 1999 - Volume 19 - Issue 1 > Effect of High- Versus Low-Frequency Exercise Training in Mu...
Journal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation:
Original Articles

Effect of High- Versus Low-Frequency Exercise Training in Multidisciplinary Cardiac Rehabilitation on Health-Related Quality of Life

Berkhuysen, Marike A. MSc*†¶; Nieuwland, Wybe MD*§∥; Buunk, Bram P. PhD‡; Sanderman, Robbert PhD†‡; Viersma, JanWillem MD, PhD§∥; Rispens, Piet MD, PhD*

Collapse Box

Abstract

Background. The authors examined the importance of the frequency of aerobic exercise training in multidisciplinary rehabilitation in improving health-related quality of life in the short run in patients with documented coronary artery disease.

Methods. Patients (114 males and 16 females; age range, 32-70 years) were randomized into either a high-frequency or a low-frequency exercise training program (10 versus 2 sessions per week, respectively) as part of a 6-week multidisciplinary cardiac rehabilitation program. The General Health Questionnaire and the RAND-36 were used to assess changes in psychological distress and subjective health status.

Results. After 6 weeks, high-frequency patients reported significantly more positive, change in "psychological distress" (P < 0.05), "mental health" (P = 0.05), and "health change" (P < 0.01), than low-frequency patients. Apart from changes in mean scores, individual effect sizes indicated that a significantly greater percentage of high-frequency patients experienced substantial improvements in "psychological distress" (P < 0.01), "physical functioning" (P < 0.05), and "health change" (P < 0.05), compared with low-frequency patients. In addition, deterioration of quality of life was observed in a considerable number of high-frequency patients (ranging from 1.7% to 25.8% on the various measures).

Conclusions. The frequency of aerobic exercise has a positive, independent effect on psychological outcomes after cardiac rehabilitation. However, this benefit after high-frequency rehabilitation appears to be limited to a subgroup of patients. Further investigation is required to identify these patients. Results provide input into recent controversies regarding the role of exercise training in cardiac rehabilitation.

© 1999 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.

Login

Article Tools

Share

Article Level Metrics

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.