Journal of Craniofacial Surgery

Home Current Issue Previous Issues Published Ahead-of-Print Collections Translations For Authors Journal Info
Skip Navigation LinksHome > May 2008 - Volume 19 - Issue 3 > Subperiosteal Release of the Floor of the Mouth in Airway Ma...
Journal of Craniofacial Surgery:
May 2008 - Volume 19 - Issue 3 - pp 609-615
doi: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e31816aab0b
Original Articles

Subperiosteal Release of the Floor of the Mouth in Airway Management in Pierre Robin Sequence

Breugem, Corstiaan C. MD, PhD; Olesen, Peter R. MD, FRCSC; Fitzpatrick, Donald G. MD, FRCSC; Courtemanche, Douglas J. MD, MS, FRCSC

Collapse Box

Abstract

Procedures to relieve airway obstruction in Pierre Robin sequence (PRS) include glossopexy, mandibular distraction, and tracheostomy. Previously, it has been suggested that the imbalance of the genioglossus insertion on the mandible could be responsible for the micrognathia, tongue elevation, and glossoptosis seen in PRS. We performed a retrospective study to determine the usefulness of subperiosteal release of the floor of the mouth in PRS with airway problems. Between 1991 and 2005, 14 consecutive patients with PRS were treated with subperiosteal release of the floor of the mouth performed at the British Columbia's Children's Hospital. There were 8 boys and 6 girls. Mean age at surgery was 15 weeks (range, 1-68 weeks). Postoperative follow-up ranged from 8 months to 13 years. Seven patients (4 boys and 3 girls) were successfully treated, and a tracheostomy was prevented. Fifty-five percent of the syndromic patients needed a tracheostomy, whereas 1 patient (33%) with isolated PRS needed a tracheostomy. The most common syndrome associated with PRS was Stickler syndrome. Five (72%) of the 7 patients who required a tracheostomy were boys. If conservative measures fail to relieve supraglottic airway obstruction seen in patients with PRS, a subperiosteal release of the floor of the mouth can be an effective intervention in certain patients. It is a simple intervention with few complications and little morbidity. More investigations are mandatory to precisely define patient characteristics ideal for this intervention.

© 2008 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.

You currently do not have access to this article.

You may need to:

Note: If your society membership provides for full-access to this article, you may need to login on your society’s web site first.

Article Tools

You currently do not have access to this article.

You may need to:

Note: If your society membership provides for full-access to this article, you may need to login on your society’s web site first.

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.