MATERIALS AND METHODS
This retrospective study reviewed 22 consecutive patients who underwent scar revision with a modified dovetail-plasty between November 2010 and August 2012. Our study group consisted of 28 cases in 22 patients (9 males and 13 females) with a mean age of 33.6 years (range, 6–61 years). Two patients had scars in 2 locations, and the other 2 patients had scars in 3 locations for the modified dovetail-plasty. The 28 procedures were for conspicuous scars on the face (n = 14) and extremities (n = 14) that was caused by trauma (8 patients), an operation (4 patients), burns (3 patients), full-thickness skin graft (3 patients), split-thickness skin graft (2 patients), and flaps (2 patients). Conspicuous scars occurred at the margin of the grafts and flaps. The defined scar locations on the face were the upper eyelid (n = 3), glabella (n = 3), upper lip (n = 3), philtrum (n = 2) (Fig. 2A), medial canthal area (n = 1), mandibular border (n = 1), and chin (n = 1). The defined scar locations on the extremities were the dorsal digital web (n = 4), dorsal foot (n = 3) (Fig. 3A), dorsal toe web (n = 2), axilla (n = 2), shoulder (n = 1), upper arm (n = 1), and thigh (n = 1). The conspicuous scars were classified as contracted (8 patients), depressed (7 patients), uneven (4 patients), or wide (3 patients). These types can lead to a combined appearance. The scar length measured less than 5 cm in 21 cases and greater than 5 cm in 7 cases. The long scars involved the extremity (Table 1).
There are surgical techniques for the modified dovetail-plasty, which are divided into serial (Fig. 3B) and alternative (Fig. 2B) types. A long, linear wide scar can be used as an alternative dovetail flap for diverting both lateral perpendicular tensions.
The design of the original dovetail-plasty is the same as the dovetail joint. The technique consisted of a precut trapezoid flap and its insertion and was intended for making a philtrum fold (Fig. 1).
Our design for the modified dovetail-plasty has a unique Y-shape incision, which can be opened into an M or inverted U shape for a releasing effect. Our design also was effective in wide and contracted scars by releasing, lengthening, and reducing the tension of the scars (Fig. 4).
Intraoperative marking of the fusiform excision line for the scar was performed before local anesthetic infiltration. The authors designed Y-shape incision lines along the relaxed skin tension lines on one side of the excision line and trapezoid incision lines on the other side. The length of each line was 2 to 3 mm for a facial scar (Fig. 2B) and 5 mm or more for an extremity scar (Fig. 3B). We determined the interval between each dovetail flap according to the size of the flap. Three patients had a combined Z-plasty.
The area of the scar revision was then infiltrated with 1% lidocaine with 1:100,000 units of epinephrine. The pattern of the design was incised after scar tissue excision. The Y-shape incision was opened, and a trapezoid flap on the other side of the excision line was inserted into opened space. We did excessively advance the dovetail flap. The small size for the trapezoid flap could lead to partial necrosis. We performed subcutaneous and dermal suturing with 5-0 Vicryl or 6-0 PDS and skin sutures with 6-0 or 7-0 nylon. The corners of these flaps were sutured with 6-0 nylon (Figs. 2C, 4C). Large dovetail flaps greater than 5 mm were used in the dorsal foot (2 patients) and axillary web (2 patients). The outcome over 6 months after surgery was characterized as excellent for inconspicuous scars, good for partially depressed scars, fair for partially hypertrophic scars, and poor for extensively hypertrophic scars.
The total number of dovetail flaps in 22 patients was 54 (mean, 2.45; range, 1–6). Dovetail flaps can be used as a combination of serial or alternative types. The serial type of dovetail flap was used for 25 of 28 procedures. The mean follow-up period after surgery was 8.4 months (range, 1–25 months).
Sixteen of 22 patients were evaluated over 6 months after the operation for their outcomes. There were scar depressions (2 patients) and hypertrophic scars (1 patient) in the interval area between the dovetail flaps. Diffuse hypertrophic scarring occurred in 1 patient on the dorsal foot scar, which she did not manage with a pressure garment. There was no wound dehiscence, necrosis, abscess, or cellulitis. Minimal tip abrasions on the dovetail flaps during the early stage after surgery were managed with conservative dressing. All of the patients except for one were satisfied with the result. However, there was a tendency for hypertrophic scarring on the extremities. Therefore, a postoperative pressure garment on the extremity may be helpful. The overall success rates for the procedure as assessed by the surgeons were as follows: excellent (12 patients, 75%), good (2 patients, 12.4%), fair (1 patient, 6.3%), and poor (1 patient, 6.3%) (Figs. 2D, 3D) (Table 1).
There are many types of scars, such as linear, wide, smooth, uneven, depressed, trapdoor, and hypertrophic scars. The ultimate goal of any operation in plastic surgery is to leave a linear scar. A linear scar is also the goal for scar revision. A scar in Asians is more conspicuous than in whites. Thus, every attempt should be made to leave a linear scar as inconspicuous as possible in Asian patients.1
The success of scar revision, or camouflage, is dependent on many parameters. Some of these include scar location, patient age, nature of the initial injury, condition of the adjacent tissue, skin loss, ethnic background, skin type, patient expectations, and scar orientation.5 One of the conditions is tension. The multidirectional tension may overstimulate the fibroblast, causing the production of excess collagen, which is the main constituent of a conspicuous scar.6
Mechanical conditions, such as flap immobilization and extensive tension, for example, induced by sutures, have a detrimental influence on the healing process7 Local flaps, such as Z-plasty, W-plasty, or a geometric broken-line suture (GBLC), reduce the wound tension.2,3
An important factor for the modified dovetail-plasty is wound tension. The tension between the concave and convex areas is higher than that for simple closure. However, as trapezoid flaps are being inserted to counter the insertion area, each face of the flap became packed. The idea of this technique is that flap packing weakens the lengthwise stress. Therefore, packing can prevent scar widening or hypertrophic scar formation. In addition, the interval areas between the flaps are tension-free because of excessive approximation during flap packing. The modified dovetail-plasty could free scar tension more than a simple Z-plasty. This technique also could insert many flaps in limited space without unnecessary tissue sacrifice compared with W-plasty. A modified dovetail-plasty can be used to camouflage scars located in areas with extensive tension.
This technique was used for scar revision of the glabella, chin, philtrum, upper lip (Fig. 2A), and upper eyelid. In addition, the technique can be used for scar revision of contracted and/or wide scars of the extremities on the joint areas, resulting in motion and/or excessive tension (Fig. 3A). However, the technique does not work for hypertrophic scars resulting from excessive sebum production and for genetic scars without excessive tension.
In addition to the revision of scars under extensive tension, this modified dovetail-plasty can be used to revise trapdoor and marginal scars from skin flaps and grafts (Fig. 3A). The sheet of the internal scar is primarily responsible for raising the skin inside of the semicircle. As a result of the contraction on the semicircular scar surface, an uneven trapdoor deformity developed. The modified dovetail-plasty can release the contracted trapdoor part of the scar, and a trapezoid flap for the counterpart of the scar can be inserted into the empty place after releasing the contracted trapdoor part. The uneven scars can be revised to even, flat scars.
The sizes of the dovetail flaps were 2 to 3 mm for the face and 5 mm or greater for the extremities. In addition to the flap itself, the interval area between the flaps is an important factor in the modified dovetail-plasty. The interval area is a negative tension area; therefore, the wound tends to be inverted or everted, not flat. If the wound for the interval area is repaired with the usual suture technique, the wound will be depressed during scar maturation. Therefore, everted sutures should be performed at the interval area (Fig. 3C). The interval area between the dovetail flaps is an important factor for a modified dovetail-plasty. If the interval length is too long, visible scar widening can occur in this area because of decreased absorption of the perpendicular tensions. We decided that the length of the interval area between the flaps was similar to the size of the flaps. Achieving an adequate interval length is difficult for long scars of the extremities.
The depression deformity can occur in the interval area of the dovetail flaps on the face postoperatively. However, this deformity can be prevented using an everted suture technique. Hypertrophic scarring can occur in a modified dovetail-plasty of the extremity postoperatively. This scarring will gradually improve over a long follow-up period and can also be prevented using a pressure garment.
This modified dovetail-plasty is a more complicated and time-consuming technique than other flaps for scar revision. However, this technique reduces perpendicular tension more than Z-plasty and sacrifices less tissue than W-plasty, GBLC, or the original dovetail cheiloplasty. This technique is a new method for scar revision on the face and extremities.
1. Onizuka T. Scar revision. Aesth Plast Surg
1982; 6: 85–89
2. Hove CR, Williams EF, Rodgers BJ. Z-plasty: a concise review. Facial Plast Surg
2001; 17: 289–293
3. Rodgers BJ, Williams EF, Hove CR. W-plasty and geometric broken line closure. Facial Plast Surg
2001; 17: 239–244
4. Pae NS, Kim YS, Park BY. Dovetail cheiloplasty. J Korean Soc Plast Reconstr Surg
2004; 31: 594–598
5. Zide MF. Scar revision with hypereversion. J Oral Maxillofac Surg
1996; 54: 1061–1067
6. Widgerow AD. Cellular/extracellular matrix cross-talk in scar evolution and control. Wound Repair Regen
2011; 19: 117–133
7. Nilsson T. Effect of increased and reduced tension on the mechanical properties of healing wound in the abdominal wall. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg
1982; 16: 101–105
Keywords:© 2014 by Mutaz B. Habal, MD.
Cicatrix; surgical flap; surface tension; scar revision