Home Current Issue Archives Published Ahead-of-Print Collections Translations For Authors Journal Info
Skip Navigation LinksHome > May 2011 - Volume 22 - Issue 3 > Cementation of Prosthetic Restorations: From Conventional Ce...
Journal of Craniofacial Surgery:
doi: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e31820fe205
Clinical Studies

Cementation of Prosthetic Restorations: From Conventional Cementation to Dental Bonding Concept

Haddad, Marcela Filié DDS, MR; Rocha, Eduardo Passos DDS, MR, PhD; Assunção, Wirley Gonçalves DDS, MR, PhD

Collapse Box

Abstract

The cementation procedure of metal-free fixed partial dentures exhibits special characteristics about the porcelains and cementation agents, which turns the correct association between these materials necessary. Our purpose in this literature review was to point the main groups of cements associated to metal-free restoration and discuss about the advantages, disadvantages, and recommendations of each one. Our search was confined to the electronic databases PubMed and SciELO and to books about this matter. There are essentially 3 types of hard cement: conventional, resin, or a hybrid of the two. The metal-free restorations can be fixed with conventional or resin cements. The right choice of luting material is of vital importance to the longevity of dental restorative materials. Conventional cements are advantageous when good compressive straight, good film thickness, and water dissolution resistance are necessary. However, they need an ideal preparation, and they are not acid dissolution resistant. Conventional cements are indicated to porcelains that cannot be acid etched. Resin cements represent the choice to metal-free restoration cementation because they present better physical properties and aesthetic than conventional agents.

© 2011 Mutaz B. Habal, MD

Follow Us!

Login

Search for Similar Articles
You may search for similar articles that contain these same keywords or you may modify the keyword list to augment your search.